OPTIONS FOR FOREIGN POLICY THE OLD COLD WAR 1945-1991 • The old cold war started with United States becoming the great victor in 1945, followed by Europe’s division in 1947 and Soviet nuclear test in 1949 • Although, after the Cuban Missile Crisis 1962, despite local conflicts of many sorts, the U.S. and the Soviet Union both sought to avoid the kinds of direct confrontations that might have triggered a mutual catastrophe, however the cold war ended years later in 1991 after consuming the entire globe both financially and politically • The major components of cold war included ideological division, a bipolar world and militarization and arms race THE NEW COLD WAR • The cold war never ended; it just transformed into a soft version • As before, the United States and its rivals are engaged in an accelerating arms race, focused on defense and arms building of ever-increasing range, precision, and lethality • Countries, in characteristic Cold War fashion, are lining up allies in what increasingly looks like a global power struggle
But the similarities end here…
THE NEW COLD WAR • Super power rivalry now is primarily among the three poles, the United States, China and Russia • The U.S. has now found itself in what is known as the ‘Thucydides Trap’ (rivalry between an established power and a rising one) • Intensification of trade war • Rising Chinese influence • Shift of wealth and economic power from West to the East A MULTIPOLAR WORLD • According to the data released by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) in April 2020, the total global military expenditure rose to $1917 billion in 2019, with an increase of 3.6 per cent from 2018 and the largest annual growth in spending since 2010. • The five largest spenders in 2019, which accounted for 62 per cent of expenditure, were the United States, China, India, Russia and Saudi Arabia. • This is the first time that two Asian states have featured among the top three military spenders. UNITED STATES’ ROLE IN THE WORLD • Since the end of WWII, United States has been the central player in the international system, leading in the creation of new international organizations like the United Nations, NATO, the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank • American diplomacy has been essential to multinational agreements on trade, climate, regional security and arms control. Americans could and did claim to be at the center of a “rules-based international order” WHAT MADE UNITED STATES A SUPER POWER IN THE OLD COLD WAR ERA? 1. In contrast to the direct rule of the British in the 1800s, U.S. has dominated world affairs since 1945 mainly by using indirect forms of influence or neo-colonial strategies. 2. U.S. has not built an empire by colonising other nations. Instead, it has used hard power and soft power mechanisms, such as wars, threats, economic sanctions, media, aid and diplomacy. 3. U.S. has never experienced an act of war on its own land, except perhaps 9/11. When Europeans were busy fighting each other, U.S. was working on its nuclear technology. IS UNITED STATES RECEDING? • United States’ singular post-Cold War dominance is fading now, it no longer occupies the unrivaled position of strength that it enjoyed after the collapse of the Soviet Union • United States’ “rebalance to Asia” (shifting from a foreign policy dominated by the Middle East to one more centered on Asia) becomes its point of focus • What U.S. now have, is just an opportunity to join China and Russia in peace making and economic development in the world REASONS OF U.S. ECONOMIC SLOW-DOWN
1. Heavy costs of war
2. Focus on short-term interests, rather than cooperation with other countries 3. Imposing protectionist trade barriers against other countries. 4. Requiring other countries to pay more for their collective defense REASONS OF U.S. ECONOMIC SLOW-DOWN
5. Trumponomics:
Lower international trade
Disincentivizing investment European political risk Tax reduction for Individuals ECONOMIC COLD WAR • As the twenty-first century is driven by multiple sets of political economic forces where the economic connectivity thrust initiated by China is far reaching, the west is coming up with alternatives to China’s BRI
• BRI comes up with huge financing to the
developing world, whereas the western “alternatives” are only intended to evaluate infrastructure projects and lack vision CHINA’S BRI TAKING OVER • Mid to late 1990s and early 2000s BRI, both land-based routes and maritime silk route, connecting China with the world economies on a trans-continental scale could well become the biggest projects of the twenty first century • China is engaged in economic projects with some 65 other countries that account collectively for over 30 percent of global GDP, 62 percent of population, and 75 percent of known energy reserves • China has also announced Health Silk Road, which aims to improve public health in countries along China’s Belt and Road CHINESE INVESTMENTS TO THE WORLD • China is spending billions of dollars around the world through building infrastructure, roads, ports and highways. The value of China’s overseas investment and construction combined since 2005 is approaching $2 trillion, according to the China Global Investment Tracker, the American Enterprise Institute • From 2005 to 2017, low and middle-income economies received 83.9 percent of the $734 billion spent by China on construction projects across the globe. In contrast, high-income countries – mainly those in North America and Europe – attracted 65.6 percent of Chinese FDI outflows THE CHINESE UMBRELLA • China has become second largest contributor to the United Nations Peace Keeping. However, it is contributing to the world beyond financial investments and infrastructure building. It is emerging as a strategic problem solver for many global issues, for which U.S. was idealized once • China is emerging as a transit and destination country for refugees. In the past 20 years, China experienced at least four mass influxes of displaced foreigners from neighboring countries; North Koreans since the mid-1990s, the Kokangs from Myanmar in 2009 and then since 2015, and the Kachins from Myanmar since 2011 THE CHINESE UMBRELLA
• China has also emerged as the
powerbroker in global climate talks as it hosted many of the preparatory meetings that were crucial for setting the direction, helping fill a leadership vacuum created by Trump administration in 2017 2020: CHINA IS A SAVIOR • China’s outreach to the world during the hard times of Coronavirus pandemic, especially to Italy, Iran, Pakistan and even the U.S. is commendable • It was China that stepped up first to help Italy and dispatched masks, ventilators and 300 intensive care doctors to support overwhelmed hospitals in the country • China also stands in the forefront to help Africa with massive donations and has given a $50 million gift to WHO, to fight the coronavirus pandemic • The Jack Ma Foundation has also sent 20,000 testing kits, 1,000,000 masks and 1,000 protective suits and face shields to all countries of Africa. • The projection of state power beyond its borders was the domain of U.S. and the west. The role is fast changing RUSSIAN POSITION • Russia is an equal player in the global agenda of the multipolar world, where in various spheres there are different leading countries such as United States and China. Russia is no longer defending its interests, its expanding them • Russia is ready to take measures for the transcontinental cooperation, and aims to avoid new arms race. Russia has initiated peace talks in Afghanistan in collaboration with China • Russia faces disintegration and, therefore, it urgently needs to begin new mobilization and/or to align with China and the West RUSSIAN POSITION • Russia is a strategic partner of China in the Far East region and in “The New Silk Road” project targeting Western European markets and Central Asian infrastructure projects • Russia is also seeking a unified European security system where it can participate also through the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) GEOPOLITICS AND GEOECONOMICS • What China is doing today to win friends and influence people is within the range of what other countries do to exert “soft power,” but the efforts at persuasion and cooperation such as cultural exchanges, conferences, speeches, and paid advertisements, are all benefitting the nations of the world, and United States acknowledges it • The world is experiencing a crisscross of geopolitics and geoeconomics with their core ingredients of space, territory, territoriality, and power, and resources, capital, technology, information and services, respectively PAKISTAN: A PIVOT STATE • Pakistan is a junction of South Asia, West Asia (Middle East) and Central Asia; a way from resource efficient countries to resource deficient countries, which makes it important for not only its neighboring countries, but also for major powers, including China, Russia and the United States • Pakistan’s sincere efforts on War on Terror along with the counter-terrorism operation, Zarb-e- Azb, is globally acknowledged and appreciated. • Pakistan has also largely contributed in initiating and promoting Afghan-led and Afghan-owned peace process PAKISTAN: A PIVOT STATE • The world is facing energy shortage, terrorism and most recently health crisis. Pakistan can play its role in regional and global integration, using CPEC as an opportunity to become a frontline state of economic and health initiatives by China. Pakistan’s potential to emerge as an energy and trade corridor, and now a health corridor is immense LAST WORD… • Nationalist ideologies are back and are now translated and re-emerged as economic competition • Bush new world order has dead-ended in “No World Order” • U.S. failed efforts in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria testify to the impossibility of imposing a new world order by force. In addition to this, it is easy to predict China taking over the west, given the geostrategic changes in result of COVID-19 pandemic • United States has lost opportunity after opportunity to play the global leader role, it was known for. It has failed the test on all three fronts of wealth, power and legitimacy “The trouble with a cold war is that it doesn’t take too long before it becomes heated.” ― Anthony T. Hincks Hincks is a British Author
Issues in South Asia Author(s) : Anirudha Gupta Source: International Journal On World Peace, DECEMBER 1996, Vol. 13, No. 4 (DECEMBER 1996), Pp. 3-16 Published By: Paragon House