Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Technical
As on date
Static
Rationale
Techniques
1. Common Size Statements
2.Comparative Statements
3.Trend Percentages
4.Ratio Analysis
5.Funds Flow Analysis
1
Rationale
2
Rationale
3
Rationale
4
Rationale
5
Techniques of financial statement Analysis
Sr. Details A B
01 Sales 1,10,000 % 1,70,000 %
02 Sales Return 10,000 0.10 25,000 0.17
03 Net Sales 1,00,000 100 1,45,000 100
04 Purchases 60,000 60.00 80,000 55.17
05 Wages 5,000 5.00 15,000 10.34
06 Fuel 3,000 3.00 6,000 4.14
07 Factory Expenses 7,000 7.00 9,000 6.21
08 Office Expenses 2,000 2.00 4,000 2.76
09 Salaries 5,000 5.00 7,500 5.17
10 Rent 6,000 6.00 6,000 4.14
11 Interest 1,000 1.00 1,350 0.93
12 Misc Expenses 1,000 1.00 1,650 1.14
13 Total Expenses 90,000 90 1,30,500 90
14 Net Profit 10,000 10.00 14,500 10.00
6
Techniques of financial statement Analysis
2. Comparative Statement – Compare one firm with another
3. TREND PERCENTAGES
8
11
COMMON SIZE STATEMENT
Meaning:
Calculations: CA / CL
If CA are 2,000 and CL 10,000 ratio = 2:1
Standard: usually 2:1
Decision and Comments
Meaning:
Calculations: (CA-Stock) / CL
If CA are 2,000, stock is 5,000 and CL 10,000 ratio = 1.5:1
Standard: usually 1:1
Decision and Comments; Which one is better
Ratios A B C
NOC
FA TURNOVER, PROFTABILITY RATIOS
Sales divided by FA
If this is 6 times, what is its interpretation?
Profitability Ratios
GP Margin / Net Profit Margin / Investment T.O. /
Return on Investment (ROI)
EPS / DPS / Retention Ratio / PE Ratio
19
ROI = 30%
ROI = NPM * Investment Turnover
NPM=NP/Sales ITO=Sales/Inv
NPM= 6 ITO 5
Total 1400
20
Financial Leverage - Effect of using more / less debt on EPS
Details Firm A Firm B Firm B – 2
1. Total Assets 1000 1000 1000
2. Equity 1000 500 200
3. Debt carrying 10% interest 00 500 800
4. ROA 20% 200 200 200
5. Less Interest 00 50 80
6. EAIBT 200 150 120
7. Less Taxes (50%) 100 75 60
8. EAIT 100 75 60
9. Nos of Shares 100 50 20
10. EPS 1.00 1.50 3.00
Observations: See next slide
21
Financial Leverage - Effect of using more / less debt on EPS
Details Firm A Firm B Firm B – 2
1. Total Assets 1000 1000 1000
2. Equity 1000 500 200
3. Debt carrying 10% interest 00 500 800
4. ROA 20% 200 200 200
5.EPS 1.00 1.50 3.00
Observations
A. Difference between A and B?
B. Difference between B and B-2?
C. Percent change in Debt from B to B – 2 and % change in EPS?
D. What will be EPS of B if Debt is 900 and equity is 100
E. Can firm ‘B’ continue increasing Debt and take it from 50% to 90%
F. Conditions in which firm should lower down or increase D/E Ratio
G. Any other observation???
22
Financial Leverage - Effect of using more / less debt
Assets 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
1. Equity 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100
2. Debt (10% interest) 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
3. Debt - Equity Ratio 1:4 3:7 2:3 1:1 3:2 7:3 4:1 9:1
4. ROA 20% 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
5. Less Interest 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
6. EAIBT 180 170 160 150 140 130 120 110
7. Less Taxes 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55
8. EAIT 90 85 80 75 70 65 60 55
9. Nos of Shares 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10
10. EPS 1.125 1.214 1.333 1.500 1.750 2.167 3.000 5.500
11. % increase in Debt 50.00 33.33 25.00 20.00 16.67 14.29 12.5
12. Trend in % increase 16.67 8.33 5.00 3.33 2.38 1.79
13. % increase in EPS 7.9365 9.8039 12.5 16.667 23.81 38.462 83.333
14. Trend in increase in EPS 1.87 2.69 4.17 7.14 14.65 44.87
Observations: At 10% debt, EPS is 1.125, at 50% debt EPS is 1.50 and at 90% it is 5.50
Can a firm afford to increase to this level? What can be maximum limit?
23