LTE FDD Coverage Planning - Cell Range

Index

 LTE/EPC Overview
 LTE Air Interface
 Air Interface Overheads
 RRM overview
 LTE Link Budget
 Radio Planning – Coverage Planning Cell Range
 Radio Planning – Capacity
 LTE Performance Simulations
 Nokia LTE Solution
 Initial Parameters Planning

2
 Module Objectives

•After completing this module, the participant will be able to:

• Describe the main propagation models
• Calculate the cell range
• Compare the cell range of LTE with other technologies

3
 Coverage Dimensioning

• Propagation Models/ Cell Range Calculation

• Coverage Calculation
• Example: Service Dependent Coverage
• Comparison: LTE vs. other technologies

4
 Propagation Modelling
Propagation modeling belongs to the technology independent area. Good propagation modeling is
crucial for exact network planning and dimensioning. Nokia recommendations:
• Checks should be made to ensure that the digital terrain map (DTM) is up-to-date and is accurate in
terms of clutter, vectors, and ground height. The DTM resolution should be about 20 m for urban and
suburban areas and about 50 m for rural areas.
• The number of clutter categories should be approximately 10.
• If an operator specifies the propagation model, then the results should be compared with those
generated by an Nokia model to identify any significant differences.
• Building vectors should be used if the radio network plan includes micro cells with antenna which are
below the roof-top.
• RF measurements used to tune a propagation model should be based upon at least eight sites, with a
further two sites measured for subsequent model validation. Drive routes should be planned to remain
within the 3 dB beam width of the antenna and should avoid elevated sections of road, tunnels or
cuttings. The drive route should include a balance of line-of-site and non-line-of-site locations.
• Measurement data should be filtered, binned and analyzed prior to completing tuning. Each clutter type
should have at least 400 data samples after binning. The most appropriate type of propagation models
should be determined during the tuning procedure. After tuning, the models should be validated and
periodically audited.

5
 Propagation Models

• Empirical
An equation based on extensive empirical measurements is created.
Those models can be used only in the environments similar to the
examined one. The small changes in the environment characteristic can
cause enormous errors in the prediction of wave propagation.

• Semi-empirical Combination of empirical and

deterministic models (e.g. empirical
COST Hata can be combined with the
theoretical knife edge model).

• Deterministic
Wave propagation is described by means of rays travelling between transmitted and
receiving antenna and coming in to reflections, scattering, diffractions, etc . Those
methods, generally based on ray optical techniques, give a very accurate description of the
wave propagation but require a large computation time.

6
 Propagation Models used in Nokia tools

• Okumura-Hata

Statistical  to be tuned!
- The most commonly used statistical model
• Walfish-Ikegami
- Statistical model especially for urban environments
• Juul-Nyholm
- Same kind of a prediction tool as Hata, but with
different equation for predictions beyond radio
horizon (~20km)

Deterministic
• Ray-tracing
- Deterministic prediction tool for
microcellular environments

7
 Applicability of the Okumura-Hata and Walfisch-Ikegami propagation models

Okumura-Hata Walfisch-Ikegami
Frequency Range 150 MHz to 1.0 GHz 800 MHz to 2.0 GHz
1.5 to 2.0 GHz

eNodeB Antenna 30 to 200 m 4 to 50 m

Height above roof-top above
Applicability roof-top
of the Okumura-Hata
UE Antenna Height 1 to 10 m and Walfisch-Ikegami
1 to 3 m propagation
models

Range 1 to 20 km 30 m to 6 km
Applicable to Macrocells Macrocells

8
 Propagation Models – Okumura-Hata & COST Hata model

•In order to fit the Okumura-Hata model into the operation frequencies of 3G, some additional measurements
and adjustments were done in the framework of European Cooperation in the Field of Scientific & Technical
Research (COST)
•The validity range for the extended model:
- Frequency f: 150 MHz – 2000 MHz
- Distance R: 1-20 km
- BS height hBS: 10-200m
- MS height hMS: 1-10m correction
area type
factor [dB]
•The correction factor c present in the model depends on area type
dense urban areas -3
city center areas 0
 2  f 
2  log10    5.4 suburban areas 12,27
Correction    28  for suburban areas
4.78  log 2  f   18.33  log  f   44.94 rural areas 32,52
Factor  10 10 for rural areas

9
Propagation Models – Okumura-Hata & COST Hata model

L = A + B  log10 (f) - 13.82  log10 (h BS ) - a(h MS )  [44.9 - 6.55  log10 (h BS )]  log(R)

+ CorrectionFactor  MorphoCorrection

 R  .............
69.99 150 MHz  f  1500 MHz 
A= 
46.30 1500 MHz  f  2000 MHz 

26.16 150 MHz  f 1500 MHz 

B= 
33.90 1500 MHz  f < 2000 MHz 

a(h MS ) = [1,1  log10 (f) - 0,7]  h MS - 1.56  log10 ( f )  0.8

10
 Link Budget
Propagation Model: Modified Cost231-Hata

 f  h  h   d 
L  A  B log   13.82 log BS   a MS   s log   Lclutter
 MHz   m   m   km 
Frequency A B
150-1500 MHz 69.55 26.16
1500-2000MHz 46.3 33.9
3 DU
0 U

    f 
2

   5.4 
Clutter correction Lclutter    2  lg 
28   
SU
     
Term Lclutter 
 4.78  lg f 2  18.33 log f   40.94  RURAL

 
 4.78  lg f 2  18.33 log f   35.94  ROAD

UE Height Correction Factors a(hMS)

3.2[lg(11. 75hMS )]2  4.97 DU, U
a(hMS )  
[1.1lg( f )  0.7]hMS  [1.56 lg( f )  0.8] SU

11
Link Budget Propagation Model: Modified Cost231-Hata

Slopes: 1 or 2 slopes model

• 1 slope for d ≥ 1km & 2 slopes for d < 1km
• 2 slope is an extension of 1 slope model for d < 1km
– If cell range > 1 km results are the same for 1 slope & 2
slope models ( same formula used)
– If cell range < 1 km then 2-slope model provides better
results
• Recommended: 2 slopes model for all clutter types

  hBS 
 44.9  6.55 log m , d  1km
  
s  
 

 f   hBS   1
  47.88  13.9 log MHz   13.82 log m     log50 , d  1km
     

12
Propagation Models – Walfish-Ikegami

•Model for urban macrocellular propagation

- Antenna close to roof-top level
•Assumes regular city layout (“Manhattan grid”)
•Total path loss consists of two parts:

LOS NLOS
• line-of-sight loss • roof-to-street diffraction and scatter loss
• mobile environment losses
d

h
w
b
13
Propagation Models – COST Walfish-Ikegami model

•This semi empirical model is the special adaptation of Walfish-Bertoni model,

prepared especially for the typical antennas placement in 3G (below the roof top).
•The validity range:
- Frequency: 800 MHz- 2000 MHz
- BS height: 4 – 50 m (above roof-top)
- MS height: 1 – 3 m
- Distance: 0.02 – 5 km
•Path loss with LOS between MS & BS

LLOS  42.6  20 log10 ( f )  26 log10 ( R )

LOS: Line-off-sight  R  .............

14
 Propagation Models – Walfish-Ikegami

•Line-of-sight path (LOS)

- Use free space propagation
- Applicable for microwave & satellite links
•“Non-line-of-sight” path (NLOS)
- Heavy diffraction, refraction situations
- Great uncertainties in modelling
- COST Walfish-Ikegami model includes model for NLOS prediction
- Use ray-tracing models
• Needs detailed building databases (vectorial information)

“Manhattan grid”
model

15
Propagation Models – COST Walfish-Ikegami model

•Path loss without LOS between MS & BS (continue)

L1  L11  k a  k d  lg(d )  k f  lg( f )  9 lg(b)

 18 lg(1  hBS  h ), hBS  h

L11  
0, hBS  h
54, hBS  h


k a  54  0.8  ( hBS  h), d  0.5
hBS  h
and




54  0.8  ( hBS  h)  d
0.5
, hBS  h
and d  0.5

18, hBS  h

kd   h  h
18  15  BS , hBS  h

 h
 4  0.7 f 
  925  1, Medium sized cities and suburban centres
  
kf  
 4  0.7 f  1,

  925  Metropolitan centres

Mean building spacing: b [m]

Mean building height: h [m]

17
 Propagation Models – Microcell

Ray tracing Ray

launching

Rx
Tx

Tx
Very accurate methods, but due to the complexity of the algorithms computer power
consuming.
Digital maps with a high accuracy are required.

18
 Coverage Dimensioning

• Propagation Models/ Cell Range Calculation

• Coverage Calculation
• Example: Service Dependent Coverage
• Comparison: LTE vs. other technologies

19
 Coverage Area – Coverage Area in Dimensioning

•After cell radius has been determined, cell area can be calculated
•When calculating cell area, traditional hexagonal model is taken into account

R
R

Omni- or Bi-sector Tri-sector

6-sectored Site
A = 1,73 R2
2 A = 1,95 R23
2
A = 2,6 R1
Please note that for one hexagon the radius R is equal to the site length !!

20
 Capacity Dimensioning Process – Overview

Site Area Area Size Subscribers Traffic Model Site Capacity

Subscribers Subscriber
Density Data Volume in
BH

Total Offered Traffic

# Coverage # Capacity
Sites Sites
Max
BH = Busy Hour

# Sites

• Outputs:
• Site count for capacity and coverage
• The final number of sites is the bigger number from capacity and coverage point of view
• The calculation could be done for each clutter type and for different phases (for example years)

21
 The Number of Sites due to Coverage
Site Area Area Size Subscribers Traffic Model Site Capacity

Subscriber Data
Subscribers
Volume in BH
Density

Total Offered Traffic

# Coverage # Capacity
Sites Sites
Max

# Sites

22
 The Number of Sites due to Coverage

Area Size (Km²)

• this is the planned area
• typically defined for each clutter type
• the customer may provide this value
Site Area (Km²)
• this is the site area calculated from the link budget and using the propagation model
• depends on the number of cells per site (typical 3 cells per site)

Number of sites due to coverage:

# Sites due to Coverage = Roundup (Area Size / Site Area)

Example:
• Planned area is 100 Km²
• Site Area is 10 Km²
• The number of sites due to coverage is 100 Km²/ 10 Km² = 10

23
Coverage Area – Hexagons vs. Cells

• Three hexagons • Three cells

24
Coverage Area – DL simulation

25
Coverage Area – UL simulation

26
 Tools

There are definitely not a large number of commercial radio network planning
tools which may be used for either the path loss based approach or the LTE
simulation based approach.

However, almost any planning tool might be used for LTE DL coverage estimation
as propagation phenomenon is more or less technology independent. Trying to
simulate UL or even DL/UL throughput presents a bigger challenge, but certain
workarounds are feasible.

Currently, there are three LTE RF planning tools commercially available:

• Atoll (www.forsk.com)
• Mentum Planet (www.infovista.com)
• Asset (www.aircominternational.com)

27
Coverage Dimensioning

• Propagation Models/ Cell Range Calculation

• Coverage Calculation
• Example: Service Dependent Coverage
• Comparison: LTE vs. other technologies

28
 Exercise

• Compare the UL & DL Pathloss and Cell Range for the following services:
• DL: VoIP 12,2 Kbps
• 1024 Kbps, 2048 Kbps and 4096 Kbps
• UL: VoIP 12,2 Kbps
• 64 Kbps, 384 Kbps and 1024 Kbps

• For the pathloss use the results and the assumptions from chapter 5: LTE Link Budget
• Building Penetration Loss, Shadowing Margin & Gain Against Shadowing are considered

• For Coverage assume:

• BTS Antenna Height: 30 m
• UE Antenna Height: 1,5 m
• Propagation Model: Modified Cost 231-Hata with 2 slopes

29
 Solution – DL

4096 kbps data:

2048 kbps data: L = 134.02 dB
VoIP 1024 kbps data: L = 140.79 dB 1.43 km
12.2 kbps: L = 144.52 dB 2.24 km
L = 148.06 dB 2.85 km
3.60 km

30
 Solution – UL

VoIp 384 kbps data: 1024 kbps data:

12,2 kbps data: L = 132.46 dB L = 128.37 dB
64 kbps: L = 135.24 dB 0.99 km
1.30 km
L = 138.14 dB 1.55 km
1.88 km

31
Coverage Dimensioning

• Propagation Models/ Cell Range Calculation

• Coverage Calculation
• Example: Service Dependent Coverage
• Comparison: LTE vs. other technologies

32
Comparison: LTE vs. other technologies --- Assumptions

33
 Comparison: LTE vs. other technologies

34
Comparison: LTE vs. other technologies

- LTE deployment on existing grid should allow to achieve:

• 1024 kbps in DL & 64 kbps in UL at the cell-edge

- LTE has an additional potential for improvement:

• UL limitation can be reduced by features such as:
- TTI bundling
- enhanced frequency-selective scheduling
- interference rejection/cancellation
- enhanced/optimized power control

35