Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Project Planning
What is a log framework?
The logical framework approach was developed in the late 1960s to assist the US
Agency of International Development (USAID) with project planning.
Now most large international donor agencies and others use some type of logical or
results framework to guide project design.
The Logical Framework Approach (LFA):
• is a systematic and analytical planning process used for the results-
based planning of a project (or program) and for the associated monitoring
and evaluation system. Instead, it helps with planning projects and evaluating
them in a goal - and results - based manner.
• is an analytical process and set of tools used to support objectives-oriented
project planning and management.
• Provides a set of interlocking concepts which are used as part of an iterative
process to aid structured and systematic analysis of a project or program idea.
The LFA is therefore not per se ( as such) a method of measuring impact. Instead, it
helps with planning projects and evaluating them in a goal- and results-based manner
What is a log framework?
The basic idea of the Logical Framework Approach is
• To Condense the planned project mechanism down into a relatively
simple, linear Logic Model, using a documented situation and problem
analysis as the point of departure.
• To forms the basis for planning the monitoring and evaluation system,
whereby the project’s outputs and effects are recorded by means of
quantitative or qualitative indicators.
• Lastly, To summarize in a standard table (log-frame) the project
mechanism and the monitoring and evaluation system.
Logical Framework is a tool to help strengthen project design,
implementation and evaluation. This means that it
• is best used throughout the project cycle.
• helps to organize thinking, set performance indicators, allocate
responsibilities and communicate effectively.
A Log-frame is another name for Logical Framework, a planning tool
consisting of a matrix which provides an overview of a project's goal, activities
and anticipated results. It provides a structure to help specify the components
of a project and its activities and for relating them to one another.
What is a log framework?
In general, the logical Framework
• is a tool for improving the planning, implementation,
management, monitoring and evaluation of projects.
• is a way of structuring the main elements in a project and
highlighting the logical linkages between them.
• is a simple tool which helps to:
- Organize thinking
- Relate activities and investment to expected results;
- Set performance indicator
- Allocate responsibilities
- Communicate information on the project concisely and
unambiguously
What is a log framework?
The Need for a Logical Framework
The logical frame or log-frame was developed in response to a number of
common weaknesses in projects:
• A lack of common understanding among partners as to what the
project entails;
• Poorly focused objectives;
• Key risks and assumptions inadequately identified and addressed;
• Cause and effect linkages between objectives at different levels not
adequately explored;
• Activities and outputs that are insufficient, collectively, to achieve
higher order objectives; and
• A lack of systematic monitoring and evaluation.
A log-frame can help to resolve these shortcomings if it is applied, in a
participatory manner, throughout the project cycle.
A good understanding of its key concepts, application, potential benefits
and limitations is useful for donor, government, agency and NGO staff.
What is a log framework?
Attributes of Well-designed Log-frames can enable:
• A common understanding among the different project partners of what the
project entails with agreed and focused objectives;
• A thorough exploration of the key assumptions and the cause and effect
links between the various objective levels to reduce the risk of project
failure;
• Planned activities and outputs that are collectively necessary and sufficient
to achieve the high order objectives; and
• A systematic framework for monitoring and evaluation. Log-frames should
be seen as fluid and evolving rather than rigid plans. Indeed, it may be
necessary to go back one or two stages. This is important because relief and
development activities rarely follow a set-pattern; there is learning and
change at every stage and so in practice,
Advantages of Logic frame
1. Improve the project design and supervision. It can help to achieve a structured project
design process and provides a simple summary of the development initiative key elements in
a consistent and coherent way which clearly identifies the broad outlines of the project .
2. Fostering project performance : It provides a logic hierarchy of objectives and
forces planners to identify critical assumptions and risks by encouraging to
discussions about the feasibility, and means of verifying progress
3. Facilitating project management. The project monitoring and evaluation
information systems inform the management which the indicators describe
objectives in measurable terms and provide the basis for project monitoring,
evaluation. It establishes a framework that makes the underlying rationales and
assumptions transparent and helps changes by revising the design
4. Outline the specific inputs needed to carry out the activities/processes to produce
specific outputs which will result in specific outcomes and impacts.
5. Form the basis for monitoring and evaluation activities for all stages of the
program.
6. planning tool consisting of a matrix which provides an overview of a project's
goal, activities and anticipated results. It provides a structure to help specify the
components of a project and its activities and for relating them to one another.
7. Log frame is a tool for improving the planning, implementation, management,
monitoring and evaluation of projects. The log frame is a way of structuring the
main elements in a project and highlighting the logical linkages between them.
Terminology and definition of terms
1. Objective – a specific statement detailing the desired accomplishments of a
project at different levels (anticipated or desired output, outcome or impact)
2. Another terminology used interchangeably with ‘Objective’ is ‘Result’: the
definition of ‘Result’ is closely aligned with objectives.
• Results: the achieved output, outcome or impact (intended or unintended,
positive and/or negative) of a development intervention
1. Description of the causal linkages between the different levels of results:
Inputs: are what you contribute to the activity
Activities/processes : are actions taken or work performed using inputs
Activities •
Tasks personnel plan and undertake to transform inputs
to outputs, e.g. meetings, training events, etc
Outputs Outcomes
1. Professional training 1. Number of interns/Doctors
courses organised recruited increased
2. Rural road fixed 2. Transport costs reduced
3. Quality drinking water 3. Incidence of water-borne
produced and delivered diseases reduced
4. Agricultural inputs 4. Yield per hectare increased
distributed
Terminology and definition of terms
• Example: Match the following levels of achievement with the respective results and put them in
the correct causal order. Please try to answer the questions before you refer to the answer keys at
the end of this session.
Output Trained teachers begin to apply new methods for disciplining – and influencing
colleagues
Input Less children are subjected to harmful treatment in schools
Activity 50 teachers trained from 10 schools
More poor
Financial; • Developing defendant ,more Change in
Human; course material means created,
Number of behavior, long-
Material or curriculum improvement in level
trained or run overall
resources (material economic well-being,
course benefits or
used for the finalized and living standard,
graduates effect b/s of the
development printed) education information
intervention • Recruit and train , awareness or intervention
capacities.
For a project designed to provide training for a community to improve health status like
early child death, maternal death, water born diseases, Improvement in poverty level,
etc.
Structural Components of Logical Framework
The Vertical Logic
• But there is also the dimension of time. First we will do the activities, which fairly rapidly (in
principle as soon as they’re finished) lead to outputs.
• The realization of the purpose is further away, at the end or close to the end of the project. The
effects or impact of the project is something that we will generally notice after a longer period
Structural Components of Logical Framework
Structural Components of Logical Framework
The Horizontal Logic
1. Project logic column :
• is the first column containing the project logic is about things that are under our
control – more or less that is, especially as far as the goals or general objectives are
concerned.
• Deals with the question like “ what are we trying to accomplish and why?”
2. Assumption column:
• Deals with the question like “What other conditions must exist?”
• Assumption is the last column contain things that are not directly under the
project’s control, but that may influence its realization in a positive or a negative
way.
• Assumption is the external factors or condition outside of the project’s direct
control that are necessary to ensure the project’s success
• For the purpose of Project planning, it is essential that the external context is given
consideration in the plan. These key considerations are in the form of assumptions.
This will allow for recognition of why a project has not succeeded due to factors
outside its control.
Structural Components of Logical Framework
To make sure things go as planned and are not disrupted by the potential risks we
identified (assumptions) or things we didn’t foresee, we have to set up a system to
monitor progress and results
The assumptions made in the Project design must be recorded. These are the
conditions that:
• Are outside of the Project’s control; and
• Must exist or take place for the Project to be successful.
In order to define which assumptions are to be included, first determine
assumptions you make for each level of the objectives. These may include:
• The actions of certain groups, or Project stakeholders
• Certain economic or social conditions, such as the absence of conflict
• Political conditions, such as stability
• Conditions of climate, etc
Structural Components of Logical Framework
Assumption column….
• The assumptions made at each level of a log-frame are the necessary
conditions or events over which the project has little or no control,
• for example, sufficient water can be extracted from the river
throughout each dry season, or the timely release of budget
allocations, or security conditions remain stable. Some assumptions
relate to activities in other projects, for example UNHCR registration
project remains on schedule, or MSF clinic completed by start of
2002.
• While assumptions concern external conditions, the project may in many
cases be able to influence them,
• for example the contents of new water quality policy. If this is agreed
in particular cases, then assumptions can be converted into objective
statements (activities and outputs) e.g. draft sector water quality policy
agreed, and thus become part of the scope of the project. In this way,
the risks of project failure can be reduced.
• The lower the degree of risk or uncertainly, the stronger the design of the
project. ‘Killer assumptions’, i.e. those on which much depends, can have a
huge impact on projects if they fail to hold true
Structural Components of Logical Framework
Assumption column : Verifying the logic: the ‘if-then’ test
• The log-frame is based on the principles of cause and effect; the better
the causal links between items in the log-frame, the better the project
design.
• For example, if we promote a range of water supply options and
develop local capacity to select and manage their preferred options,
then appropriate facilities will be installed.
• The logical flow from one level of the log-frame to the next can be
verified using the ‘if-then’ test.
• The test works upwards from activities to outputs, then to the project
purpose and goals. If all the stated activities are carried out, assuming
the assumptions are correct, then the outputs should be achieved. If all
the outputs are completed, assuming the assumptions are correct, then
the project purpose should be achieved.
Structural Components of Logical Framework
Assumptions add to the ‘if-then’ test. For example,
• if all the activities in a log-frame are satisfactorily completed and all the
assumptions hold true then the outputs at the next level should be
achieved.
• If the project team doubt whether the stated outputs will be achieved,
then it is worth reviewing outputs, activities and the assumptions to see
whether they are necessary and sufficient.
The relationship between the first and fourth column is as follows:
• When we do the activities, and our assumptions hold, we will achieve
the expected outputs;
• When the outputs are achieved, and our assumptions hold, we will
realize the project’s purpose;
• When the project’s purpose is attained, and our assumptions hold, we
will contribute to the listed goals
The If –then relationship in the logical framework
Structural Components of Logical Framework
The Horizontal Logic…
Structural Components of Logical Framework
The Horizontal Logic…
3. Indicator to verify Achievements:
• Indicator is found in the second column
• Is about how will we measure success?.
• It is a piece of information we use to get a (rather accurate) idea of how things are going
(a process indicator) or what results have been achieved so far (result indicator).
• Indicator is a quantitative or qualitative measurement which provides a reliable way to
measure changes connected to an intervention.
• In essence it is a description of the project’s objectives in terms of quantity, quality,
target group(s), time and place.
• For instance, if you want to see whether people are well nourished (or under
nourished, or even over nourished), you may want to follow up their daily intake of
calories. There is more to malnourishment than calorie intake, but it may give you a
pretty good idea about how people are progressing. But you may also want to
combine several indicators to get a completer picture, for instance to follow up the
quality and diversity of the food that people eat.
• Indicators are ways of measuring (indicating) that progress is being achieved in
a project or program, with ‘progress’ being determined by the aims and
objectives of an initiative
• The second (as well the third) columns summarize how the project’s achievements will
be monitored.
Structural Components of Logical Framework
The Horizontal Logic…
3. Indicator to verify Achievements….
Characteristic of Indicators:
• Indicator should be focused, clear and specific
Indicator should be defined in precise, unambiguous terms that describe
clearly and exactly what is being measured.
Indicator should be SMART. Try to keep your indicators specific,
Measurable, achievable, realistic, Time bounded and directly attributable to
the Project
There should be at least one indicator for each outcome
• Indicators are the keys to knowing that you are making measurable progress
towards desired results.
• Indicators are quantitative or qualitative factor or variable that provides a
simple and reliable means to measure achievement, to reflect the changes
connected to an intervention, or to help assess the performance of a
development factor.
• Connection b/n objectives and indicators: objectives capture both what we
plan to do and what we plan to achieve, respectively. But indicators can be
used to measure achievement on both of these levels.
A well-designed Indicator
Well-defined objectives and indicators play a critical role in project or program
success. Therefore, besides being SMART, here are some criteria you should
consider to have a strong indicator:
1. Focus on measuring what you need to know – not what would be good to know
2. It should be possible to understand what the indicator is measuring even if
there is a change in staff.
3. The indicator should rely on data that is available at the time when needed
and/or can be collected at a cost that is affordable and budgeted
4. You are selecting this indicator because you know before you collect the data:
who will use it, when and for what specific purpose.
5. The indicator should be directly related to the objective that you are
measuring.
6. If it is not possible to directly measure results, use a proxy. Proxy Indicators
measure outputs or outcomes that it is assumed will lead to change at higher
levels of achievement. Defining a poxy indicator require a plausible argument.
For example, measuring income of households is often difficult. We therefore
use household consumption as a proxy for income.
7. It is advisable to limit the number of indicators monitored and when possible
Use internationally accepted indicators
Structural Components of Logical Framework
Objectively Verifiable Indicators (OVIs):
• The basic principle of the OVI column is ‘if you can measure it, you can
manage it’.
• Indicators reveal the successful accomplishment of objectives. They
are not the conditions necessary to achieve a result but define in
measurable terms the performance levels required.
• It is advisable to use the minimum number of indicators necessary
to clarify what must be accomplished to satisfy the stated objective.
• OVIs define not only the accomplishment necessary but also the level
of performance necessary to reach the next objective level.
• It is therefore best to develop OVIs for the higher order objective
first and work backwards through the causal chain: from goal to
purpose then outputs and finally activities.
Structural Components of Logical Framework
Developing OVIs:
• Normally, indicators are stated in terms of quantity, quality and time (and
sometimes place and cost).
• The act of putting numbers and dates on indicators is called targeting.
• Goals, purposes and outputs can all be given indicators and targets
• Begin with the basic indicator, ensure that it is quantifiable and then
add a quality and time dimension.
Quantity + Quality + Time = QQT
• Indicators should also be SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable,
Relevant and Time bound)
A useful guide to determining indicators is to use four guiding criteria:
What is the quantity we are assessing?
What is the quality we are expecting?
What is the timeframe we expect it in?
What is the location it will occur in?
Indicators…
Level and Types of Indicators: Just as with objectives, indicators are at
different levels
1. Impact indicator/ Goal level Indicator:
• Impact indictors are Long-term results measure the impact or the achievement of
the project or program goal. It indicates the quality and quantity of long-term results
generated by the program
– % of children with improved nutritional status
– % of children with improved learning outcomes
In the table below, identify which indicator are quantitative and which are qualitative.
Indicator Quantitative Qualitative
Percentage of individual who were tested for HIV in the last 12
months and received their test results
• The extent to which gender issues are addressed in policy
• Community perception of empowerment
• % of children underweight
• % of HHs with increased income
• Evidence of NGOs adhering to code of conduct
• % of women who have accesses ANC (Antenatal care)
interventions service for improving maternal outcome
Structural Components of Logical Framework
The Horizontal Logic …
4. Verification source: These are Means of verification (MoV)
• Indicators must also have a means of verification (MoV).
• The MoV is the source of data that serves as the “proof” for the indicator.
In many cases this may be documents, or statistics
• Verification source is the third column that describe where you can find the
information of each indicator.
• Do you measure things yourself ? Or
• do you ask someone else to do it for you? Or
• is the information readily available in reports or statistics from other
sources?
• Sources of verification- Describes the information sources necessary for
data compilation that would allow the calculation of indicators. Therefore,
it is all about
What information to be made available
Where, in what form the information/ documented source should be
collected
Who should collect/ provide the information
When/how regularly it should be provided
Structural Components of Logical Framework
Project Title: