Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture 14
Material
Please note that most of the material has been taken
from MIT open courseware
User testing
Expert evaluation is useful but there is no comparison
to using the actual users for evaluation.
There are many different types of user evaluations for
example
Formative Evaluation
Field Study
Controlled Experiments
Formative Evaluations
Usually used to find problems in a prototype for
improving next version of the prototype.
Evaluates prototype or implementation in lab, on
chosen tasks
Qualitative observations (usability problems)
Field Study
Find problems in context
Evaluates working implementation in, in real context,
on real tasks
Mostly qualitative observations
Controlled Experiments
Tests a hypothesis (e.g. interface X is faster than
interface Y)
Evaluated working implementation, in controlled lab
environment on chosen tasks
Mostly quantitative observations (time, error rate,
satisfaction)
Ethics of User Testing
When ever you involve people in usability you have to
be careful of certain ethical guidelines
Human subjects have been seriously abused in the
past
Nazi concentration camps
MIT Fernald School Study: feeding radioactive isotops
to mentally retarded children
Yale Electric shock study
Is Testing User Interface Dangerous
Hopefully the answer is No.
But….
There is a lot of pressure on the user
Performance Anxiety
Feels like an intelligence test
Comparing self with other subjects
Feeling stupid
Treat the User with Respect
Time
Don’t waste it
Comfort
Make User comfortable
Informed Consent
Inform the user as fully as possible
Privacy
Preserve the user’s privacy
Control
The user can stop at any time
Before a Test
Time
Pilot-test all materials and tasks
Comfort
“We are testing the system,; we are not testing you”
Privacy
“Your tests results will be completely confidential”
Information
Brief about purpose of the study
Inform user about audio taping, video taping or otherwise
Control
You can stop at any time
During the test
Time
Eliminate unnecessary tasks
Comfort
Calm, relaxed atmosphere
Take breaks if session is long
Never act disappointed
First task should be easy
Privacy
Exclude unnecessary people
Or person the user might be intimidated from such as a boss
Control
User can give up a task or quit entirely
After the test
Comfort
Say what they have helped you to do
Information
Answer any questions they may have
Privacy
Don’t publish results with information that may identify
the user
Don’t show the video of user without their consent
Formative Evaluation
Find some users
Should be representative of the target user class, based
on user analysis
Give each user some tasks
Should be representative of important tasks based on
task analysis
Watch user perform the task
Roles in Formative Evaluation
User
Facilitator
Observer
Users Role
User should think a loud
What they think is happening
What they are trying to do
Why they took an action
Problems
Feels weird
Thinking aloud might alter behavior
Disrupts concentration
Another approach: pairs of users
This is also called co-discovery
Would required twice as many users
Facilitators Role
Does the briefing
Provides the tasks
Coaches the user to think aloud by asking questions
Controls the session
Observer’s Role
Be quiet!
Don’t help, don’t explain, don’t point out mistakes
Take notes
Watch for critical incidents: event that strongly affect task
performance or satisfaction
Usually Negative
Errors
Repeated attempts
May be positive
“Oh, now I see”
“Great!”
Recording Observations
Pen and paper notes
Audio Recording
For think aloud
Video Recording
Usability labs usually have two camera’s one for the screen and one for the
users face
User may be self conscious
Good for closed circuit view by observers in another room
Generates too much data
Retrospective testing: go back through the video with the user, discussing
critical incidents
Screen capture and Event logging
Cheap and unobtrusive
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=9wQkLthhHKA&list=PLctSiTSKouvc6oESBymSehv1
86AgQh4M3