Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Principles of Managerial Finance: Risk and Return
Principles of Managerial Finance: Risk and Return
Managerial Finance
9th Edition
Chapter 6
kt = Pt - Pt-1 + Ct
Pt-1
Return
year Stock A Stock B
1 6% 20%
2 12% 30%
3 8% 10%
4 -2% -10%
5 18% 50%
6 6% 20%
Single Financial Assets
Historical Return
Arithmetic Average
• The historical average (also called arithmetic average
or mean) return is simple to calculate.
• The accompanying text outlines how to calculate this
and other measures of risk and return.
• All of these calculations were discussed and taught in
your introductory statistics course.
• This slideshow will demonstrate the calculation of
these statistics using EXCEL.
Single Financial Assets
Historical Return
Arithmetic Average
Return Return
year Stock A Stock B year Stock A Stock B
1 0.06 0.2 1 6% 20%
2 0.12 0.3 2 12% 30%
3 0.08 0.1 3 8% 10%
4 -0.02 -0.1 4 -2% -10%
5 0.18 0.5 5 18% 50%
6 0.06 you type 0.2
What 6 What you
6% see 20%
Arithmetic Arithmetic
Average =AVERAGE(B6:B11) =AVERAGE(C6:C11) Average 8% 20%
Single Financial Assets
Historical Risk
Variance
• Historical risk can be measured by the variability of its
returns in relation to its average.
• Variance is computed by summing squared deviations
and dividing by n-1.
• Squaring the differences ensures that both positive and
negative deviations are given equal consideration.
• The sum of the squared differences is then divided by
the number of observations minus one.
Single Financial Assets
Historical Risk
Variance
Stock A
Observed Observed Difference
year Return for - Mean Squared Variance
1 6% -2% 0.00040
2 12% 4% 0.00160
3 8% 0% -
4 -2% -10% 0.01000
5 18% 10% 0.01000
6 6% -2% 0.00040
Average 8.00% Sum of Dif 0.02240 0.00448
Single Financial Assets
Historical Risk
Variance
Stock B
Observed Observed Difference
year Return for - Mean Squared Variance
1 20% 0% -
2 30% 10% 0.01000
3 10% -10% 0.01000
4 -10% -30% 0.09000
5 50% 30% 0.09000
6 20% 0% -
Average 20.00% Sum of Dif 0.20000 0.04000
Single Financial Assets
Historical Risk
Variance
68%
95%
Single Financial Assets
Expected Return & Risk
• Investors and analysts often look at historical returns
as a starting point for predicting the future.
• However, they are much more interested in what the
returns on their investments will be in the future.
• For this reason, we need a method for estimating
future or “ex-ante” returns.
• One way of doing this is to assign probabilities for
future states of nature and the returns that would be
realized if a particular state of nature would occur.
Single Financial Assets
Expected Return & Risk
Expected Return E(R) = piRi,
where pi = probability of the ith scenario, and
Ri = the forecasted return in the ith scenario.
pi[ Ri E ( R)]
2 2
Expected Return
State Probability Stock A Stock B
Boom 30% 17% 29%
Normal 50% 12% 15%
Bust 20% 5% -2%
Expected Return 12.1% 15.8%
Single Financial Assets
Expected Return & Risk
Expected Return
State Probability Stock A Stock B
Boom 0.3 0.17 0.29
Normal 0.5 0.12 0.15
Bust 0.2 0.05 -0.02
Expected Return =(B12*C12)+(B13*C13)+(B14*C14) =(B12*D12)+(B13*D13)+(B14*D14)
Single Financial Assets
Expected Return & Risk
Coefficient of Variation
State Pi Stock A Stock B
Boom 0.3 17 30
Norm al 0.5 12 15
Bust 0.2 5 -5
Expected Return 12.1 15.5
Standard Deviation 4.16 10.517
Coefficient of Variation 0.344 0.679
Portfolios of Assets
• An investment portfolio is any collection or
combination of financial assets.
• If we assume all investors are rational and therefore
risk averse, that investor will ALWAYS choose to invest
in portfolios rather than in single assets.
• Investors will hold portfolios because he or she will
diversify away a portion of the risk that is inherent in
“putting all your eggs in one basket.”
• If an investor holds a single asset, he or she will fully
suffer the consequences of poor performance.
• This is not the case for an investor who owns a
diversified portfolio of assets.
Portfolios of Assets
• Diversification is enhanced depending upon the extent
to which the returns on assets “move” together.
•This movement is typically measured by a statistic
known as “correlation” as shown in Figure 6.5 and 6.6.
Portfolios of Assets
Portfolios of Assets
Recall Stocks A and B
Return
year Stock A Stock B
1 6% 20%
2 12% 30%
3 8% 10%
4 -2% -10%
5 18% 50%
6 6% 20%
Portfolios of Assets
Portfolio AB
(50% in A, 50% in B)
Stock A Stock B Portfolio AB
Percent Percent Percent Percent Weighted
Year Weight Return Weight Return Return
1 50% 6 50% 20 13
2 50% 12 50% 30 21
3 50% 8 50% 10 9
4 50% -2 50% -10 -6
5 50% 18 50% 50 34
6 50% 6 50% 20 13
Weight A 50% Sum of Weighted Returns 84
Weight B 50% Portfolio Average Return 14
Portfolios of Assets
Portfolio AB
(50% in A, 50% in B)
Stock A Stock B Portfolio AB
Percent Percent Percent Percent Weighted
Year Weight Return Weight Return Return
1 =B$12 6 Where =B$13 20
the contents =(B6*C6)+(D6*E6)
2 =B$12 12 of cell=B$13
B12 and 30 B13 =(B7*C7)+(D7*E7)
3 =B$12 8 = 50% in this 10
=B$13 case. =(B8*C8)+(D8*E8)
4 Here=B$12 -2
are cells =B$13 -10 =(B9*C9)+(D9*E9)
5 B12=B$12
and B1318 =B$13 50 =(B10*C10)+(D10*E10)
6 =B$12 6 =B$13 20 =(B11*C11)+(D11*E11)
Weight A 0.5 Sum of Weighted Returns
=SUM(F6:F11)
Weight B =(1-B12) Portfolio Average Return
=F12/6
Portfolios of Assets
Portfolio AB
(50% in A, 50% in B)
Investment Returns
60
50
40
30 Stock A
Percent
20 Stock B
10 Portfolio AB
0
-10 1 2 3 4 5 6
-20
Year
Portfolios of Assets
Portfolio AB
(40% in A, 60% in B)
Weight A Return A (%) Return B (%) Return AB (%) SD-A (%) SD-B (%) SD-AB (%)
100% 8.0 20.0 8.0 6.7 20.0 6.7
80% 8.0 20.0 10.4 6.7 20.0 9.3
60% 8.0 20.0 12.8 6.7 20.0 11.9
40% 8.0 20.0 15.2 6.7 20.0 14.6
20% 8.0 20.0 17.6 6.7 20.0 17.3
0% 8.0 20.0 20 6.7 20.0 20.0
Portfolios of Assets
Portfolio Risk & Return
(Perfect Negative Correlation)
Stock A Stock B Portfolio AB
Percent Percent Percent Percent Weighted
Year Weight Return Weight Return Return
1 50% 20 50% 0 10
2 50% 16 50% 4 10
3 50% 12 50% 8 10
4 50% 8 50% 12 10
5 50% 4 50% 16 10
6 50% 0 50% 20 10
Weight A 50% Sum of Weighted Returns 60
Weight B 50% Portfolio Average Return 10
Portfolios of Assets
Portfolio Risk & Return
(Perfect Negative Correlation)
Weight A Return A (%) Return B (%) Return AB (%) SD-A (%) SD-B (%) SD-AB (%)
100% 10.0 10.0 10.0 7.5 7.5 7.5
80% 10.0 10.0 10.0 7.5 7.5 4.5
60% 10.0 that if10.0
Notice we weight10.0 7.5
the portfolio 7.5 1.5
50% 10.0right (50/50
just 10.0 in this 10.0
case), we 7.5
can 7.5 0.0
40% 10.0 completely
10.0 eliminate
10.0 risk. 7.5 7.5 1.5
20% 10.0 10.0 10.0 7.5 7.5 4.5
0% 10.0 10.0 10.0 7.5 7.5 7.5
Portfolios of Assets
Portfolio Risk
Portfolio (Adding Assets to a Portfolio)
Risk (SD)
SDM
0 # of
Stocks
Portfolios of Assets
Portfolio Risk
Portfolio (Adding Assets to a Portfolio)
Risk (SD)
SDM
0 # of
Stocks
Portfolios of Assets
Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
• If you notice in the last slide, a good part of a portfolio’s
risk (the standard deviation of returns) can be
eliminated simply by holding a lot of stocks.
• The risk you can’t get rid of by adding stocks
(systematic) cannot be eliminated through
diversification because that variability is caused by
events that affect most stocks similarly.
• Examples would include changes in macroeconomic
factors such interest rates, inflation, and the business
cycle.
Portfolios of Assets
Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
• In the early 1960s, researchers (Sharpe, Treynor, and
Lintner) developed an asset pricing model that
measures only the amount of systematic risk a
particular asset has.
• In other words, they noticed that most stocks go down
when interest rates go up, but some go down a whole
lot more.
• They reasoned that if they could measure this
variability -- the systematic risk -- then they could
develop a model to price assets using only this risk.
•The unsystematic (company-related) risk is irrelevant
because it could easily be eliminated simply by
diversifying.
Portfolios of Assets
Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
• To measure the amount of systematic risk an asset
has, they simply regressed the returns for the
“market portfolio” -- the portfolio of ALL assets --
against the returns for an individual asset.
• The slope of the regression line -- beta -- measures an
assets systematic (non-diversifiable) risk.
• In general, cyclical companies like auto companies
have high betas while relatively stable
companies, like public utilities,have low betas.
• Let’s look at an example to see how this works.
Portfolios of Assets
Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
M ark e t Stock B
Ye ar Re tur n Re turn
1 10 20
2 16 30
3 9 10
4 -4 -10
5 28 50
6 13 20
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0,993698
R Square 0,987435
This slide is the result of a
Adjusted R Square
0,983246
regression
Standard Error using the Excel.
2,894265
The slope of 5the regression
Observations
Coefficients
Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95%Lower 95.0%
Upper 95.0%
Intercept -3,77513 2,018166 -1,87057 0,158163 -10,1978 2,64758 -10,1978 2,64758
10 1,917349 0,124873 15,35433 0,0006 1,519946 2,314753 1,519946 2,314753
Portfolios of Assets
Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
Y
Graphic Derivation of Beta for Asset B
Predicted Y
30
25
20
Asset B Return (%)
15
10
0
-20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60
-5
-10
Market Return (%)
Portfolios of Assets
Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
Portfolios of Assets
Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
Portfolios of Assets
Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
• The required return for all assets is
composed of two parts: the risk-free rate and
a risk premium.
Example
Calculate the required return for Federal Express
assuming it has a beta of 1.25, the rate on US T-bills is
5.07%, and the expected return for the S&P 500 is 15%.
RFR =
5.07%
beta
1.0 1.25
Portfolios of Assets
Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
Required Return
k = rf + (rm - Rf)B
Example: If the rate of return on U.S. T-blls is 5%, and the expected return
for the S&P 500 is 15%, what would be the required return
for Microsoft with a beta 1.5, and Florida Power and Light with
a beta of 0.8?
MSFT FPL
rf 5.0% 5.0%
rm 15.0% 15.0%
B 1.5 0.8
Answer k? 20.0% 13.0%
Portfolios of Assets
Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
SML
k%
20
15
10
B
FPL 1 MSFT 2
Portfolios of Assets
Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
SML1
k%
20 SML2
B
FPL 1 MSFT 2
Portfolios of Assets
Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
SML2
SML1
k%
20
B
FPL 1 MSFT 2
Austin Fund’s Portfolio
Portfolio V Portfolio W
Asset Proportion Beta Asset Proportion Beta
1 0.10 1.65 1 0.10 0.80
2 0.30 1.00 2 0.10 1.00
3 0.20 1.30 3 0.20 0.65
4 0.20 1.10 4 0.10 0.75
5 0.20 1.25 5 0.50 1.05
Total 1.00 Total 1.00
n
bv=∑wi*bi
i=1
= (0.1*1.65)+(0.3*1)+(0.20*1.30)+(0.20*1.10)+(0.20*1.25)
=1.20
bw=(0.1*0.8)+(0.1*1.00)+(0.20*0.65)+(0.10*0.75)+(0.5*1.05
)
=0.95
Portfolio V’s return are more responsive to change in market
return