Comparison between York Antwerp

rule 1994 and 1974

 Rule paramount,  No rule paramount
No allowance for
sacrifice or
expenditure unless
reasonably
incurred
 Order of  Numbered rule,
application: Rule lettered rule
paramount,
numbered rule,
lettered rule
Comparison between York Antwerp
rule 1994 and 1974
 Common maritime  No mention of
adventure, when towing, pushing or
one or more salvage
vessels are towing
or pushing unless
not engaged in
commercial
activities or
salvage
Comparison between York Antwerp
rule 1994 and 1974
 Pollution liability of  No mention of
ship owner and not pollution liability.
of G.A.
 Time limit for  No such
serving notice to requirement.
claim general is 12
months from the
time of termination
of common
maritime
adventure.
Comparison between York Antwerp
rule 1994 and 1974
 After G.A if cargo is  No such provision.
forwarded to
destination after POR,
rights and liability for
G.A remains same as
even in absence of
such forwarding.
 If ship is intentionally  Same as in 1994 but
run ashore for also include for
common safety, damage to third party
consequent loss or
damage to property
involved in common
maritime adventure be
allowed in G.A.
Comparison between York Antwerp
rule 1994 and 1974
 S.A. as fixed in criteria  No such provision for
as per article 13 of ISC S.A as missing in
1989. 1910 salvage
convention.
 Include provision for
special compensation  No provision for
as per article 14 of ISC special compensation.
89.

 Cargo, stores, fuel  Same as 1994.

used for common
safety shall be
admitted as G.A.