You are on page 1of 7

STRANGE THINGS

CHURCH
V
FNU
Student: Bethania Cruz
ISSUE
 September of 2019,
FNU CEO sent to the
Pastor of Strange
Thing Church. A
letter, in which was
written that FNU was
pleading $
3,000,000.00 to the
church.
 The pastor, after calling FNU CEO to confirm the information, was told that he would receive
a check in four or six weeks; he started to make plans, and to hire people to make those plans
possible, all of this thinking about the money promised by FNU, all plans involved are for the
purpose to expend the church.
 Unfortunately, FNU’s finances started to
drop, and the promised check could not be
provided to the church. The Pastor now is
demanding to the justice that FNU makes the
donation.
LEGAL CONDUCT
 If someone made a plan, expecting the
$100 dollars that he/she would receive
from somebody else as a donation, and
now the person who was expecting to
receive the money is saying that the
other person who was expecting to
donate, has to pay because he/she
promised it;
 As good human beings, we have always to try to accomplish promises. But, something bigger
than the promise can happen, the money could not be given, and if the suppose receiver made
plans before actually having the money in his/her name or power, was not a smart and safe
action.
DECISION EXPECTED
I assume that Supreme would decide in FNU’s favor, the details
showed about the case between FNU and Strange Things
Church just shows a conversation, that normal people, as human
being usually have to friends, everybody one day can promise a
donation that in the end cannot be possible.

You might also like