Professional Documents
Culture Documents
• Bass & Bass (2008) autocratic leadership style is described commonly as the
• Anderson and brown (2010) describe power centralization may activate team
• However……
• Hoogh notes that an accepted autocratic leader fosters team psychological safety
psychological safety
Autocratic leadership style
• The idea is further supported by the research conducted by Hoogh in a study of 60 retail outlets
(225 employees and their managers) in the financial services industry which concluded that
acceptance of a leader was positively related to team psychological safety even when the leader
followed an autocratic style of management. The study also concluded that autocratic leadership
was often not well met in retail outlets where team power struggles were high. This lead to a
• Magee & Galinsky suggest that functional models of social hierarchy suggest a clear acceptance of
authority
• Teidens and Fragale further take this hypothesis and argue that it provides psychologically
reassuring environment
Autocratic leadership style
• Halevy also reinforces this theory in his research where he argues that such a reassuring
environment stemming out of autocratic leadership provides with clarity of roles and facilitation
• autocratic leadership may under certain conditions have the potential to benefit rather than to
hinder team climate and performance through creating a psychologically appealing hierarchical
• Hoogh also notes the link between the personality traits of team members in responding to
autocratic leadership
• individuals with neurotic traits respond adversely to not just autocratic but also charismatic
• Clark, & Harkness describe neurotic individuals as those who tend to experience negative
• . His research shows that neuroticism is positively related to negative emotional reactions such as strain and
• Neuroticism and low internal work locus of control moderated the relationship between leader behavior and
burnout
• While situations where charisma was found in leaders was associated with lower burnout, it can be
concluded that negative team performance was not attributed to the leadership style but rather the