Business Law Presentation

• SHIVANGI RAIZADA
• (036)
SHIVANGI RAIZADA
(036)
• SHRUTI RAWAT (037)
• SHRUTI RAWAT (037)
Section A • SOURAV SINGH (038)
• SOURAV SINGH (038)
GROUP 6 • SRISHTI GUPTA (039)
• SRISHTI GUPTA (039)
• TAMAY GUPTA (040)
• TAMAY GUPTA (040)
• VIJAY VARDHAN
• AZAD
VIJAY VARDHAN
(104)
AZAD (104)
• YASH KAUSHIK (042)
• YASH KAUSHIK (042)
 INDUSTRY’s WE CHOSE

AUTOMOTIVE FOOD
FOOD INDUSTRY
 1. Many ways into the industry :

There are many routes into food and drink to suit all, whether it’s an academic
6 path through the many engineering university courses on offer, or a more
“hands-on” approach offered by apprenticeship providing the chance to ‘earn
Reasons while you learn’. 

2. Good career Prospects :

Why Food
Food and drink offers excellent and exciting career prospects. As the India’s
Industry largest manufacturing sector, the industry will always need a steady pipeline of
employees – not just because everyone still has to eat – but importantly to take

Is Growing forward world-leading innovation to support some of the India’s best loved
brands.

Rapidly : 3. Transferable Skills :

The skills you’ll acquire are relevant and transferable across all industries. So
even if you enter the food and drink sector there’s nothing to stop you
continuing your career in another.
 4. There’s Lots of Room for New Talent :
6 All in all, the food and drink sector needs to recruit 109,000 new talented
Reasons individuals like you by 2022 to replace an ageing workforce and meet
increasing consumer demand.

Why Food 5. No 2 days are the same :

Industry There are many roles covering a wide range of topics including chemical
engineering, mechanical engineering, process control and efficiency,
automation and manufacturing systems, food science, food safety and much
Is Growing more.

Rapidly : 6. Good Pay and Prospects :

The average salary in the food and drink industry is rising faster than in any
other major manufacturing sector .
Infographics
AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY
 1. GROWING DEMAND
 Rise in middle class income and young population will result in
strong growth.

4 REASON  As the economic prosperity spreads across demographics, mobility

will no longer be a luxury but a necessity for Indians.

Growth of 2. Opportunities
Automobile  India could be leader in shared mobility by 2030, providing
opportunities for electric and autonomous vehicles.
Industry in  Force is shifting to electric vehicles to reduce emission.
India
 3. Rising Investment
 FDI inflow in the automobile sector stood at US$ 24.21 billion

4 REASON between April 2000- March 2020

 India has significant cost advantages auto firm save 10% - 25% on
operations vis-a-via Europe and Latin America.
Growth of
Automobile 4. Policy Support
Industry in  The government aims to develop India as a global manufacturing
India centre. Reforms like GST will boost the sector’s growth.
 Under the new GST regime, GST on electric vehicles in reduced
from 12% to 5%.
Infographics
Cases Related
to Selected
Industries
 Ravinder Raj v/s M/s Competent Works
• The petitioner, Mr Ravinder Raj applied to Maruti Udyog
Ltd in 1985-1986 booked a Maruti 800 Car.

CASE • On July 1988, Maruti people informed Mr Ravinder that his

Maruti car allotment No: 0802-N-04051 had matured for
RELATED delivery and asked him to make the full payment, after
TO completing the necessary formalities.

AUTOMOBILE • Mr Ravinder on 16th Feb 1989, paid an amount of Rs 80,000

INDUSTRY which covered the price of the vehicle, insurance charges
and registration charges. Also, he had opted for a cream
colour veichle.
 Ravinder Raj v/s M/s Competent Works
Increase in Excise Duty
• On March 1st, 1989 there was an increase in the excise duty. Price hike
of about Rs 7000. On 18th march, 1989, Mr Ravinder received a letter
CASE from Maruti to deposit the excess amount as excise duty. There was a
protest in the month of February.
RELATED
TO Official billing done on 5th April 1989
AUTOMOBILE
• Mr Ravinder, the petitioner contended to strive that the delay of vehicle
INDUSTRY was not occasioned it is considered to be a part of negligence.

• Therefore the petitioner applied to the district consumer forum where he

mentioned all the points, but the district forum rejected the plea.
 Ravinder Raj v/s M/s Competent Works

• The petitioner urged that he was not responsible for the delay
of delivery of vehicle and he should not be made to bear the
increase in price.
CASE
RELATED • The petitioner showed the documents which indicated that the
color of vehicle chosen by him was available with the
TO respondents.
AUTOMOBILE
• As against this the petitioner submitted that the dealer adopted
INDUSTRY the malpractices by intentionally delaying the delivery of
vehicle.
 Ravinder Raj v/s M/s Competent Works
CONCLUSION

By this we conclude that, this was a case of voidable contract, as there was a formal agreement between the
dealer and the petitioner. As the dealer misinterpreted to the petitioner by using the unfair trade practices
because of which the petitioner has to suffer.
McDonalds India Private Limited
McDonalds India Private Limited
(“Appellant”)
(“Appellant”)
vs.
vs.
Vikram
VikramBakshi
Bakshiand
andOrs.
Ors.
CORAM:-

HON'BLE MR JUSTICE
(“Respondents”)
(“Respondents”) BADAR DURREZ AHMED

2013-2019
2013-2019 HON'BLE MR JUSTICE
SANJEEV SACHDEVA

The Arbitration Act, 1940

  ARRIVAL OF MC DONOLD’S IN INDIA 1996
 DIVIDING INTO TWO GEOGRAPHICAL SECTION (NORTH-
EAST AND SOUTH-WEST)
INTRODUCTION  FIRST SUED STARTED IN 2008
 FIRST YEAR OF PROFIT
 BORROWINGS
 MC DONOLD’S DISPUTE

MC DONOLD’S ENTRY INDIAN MARKET 1996

VIKRAM BAKSHI (CRRL)

JOINT VENTURE

VIKRAM BAKSHI MC DONOLD NORTH EAST

50% EACH

TIMELINE

START OPERATION AUGUST 2013 (MD) SEPTEMBER 2013 MC DONOLD VIKRAM HIGHCOURT CASE
1996 VIKRAM BAKSHI REMOVED CLB APPROCH LCIA APPROCH ARBITRATION APPROCH

WITHOUT REGULATORY

MARCH 2017 NEXT 3 MONTHS MC DONOLD STORE CLOSED NCLT V.B MC DONOLD CONTRACT VERDICT
REAPPOINT TREMINATED 2019
APPROVAL
  6 AUGUST 2013, V.BAKSHI removal
 V.BAKSHI challenged his removal at the CLB accusing
MCDONOLD of mismanagement and oppression

CASE  In 2017, NCLT reinstated V.BAKSHI as MD of CPRL and

reinstated MCDONOLD from interfering in CPRL functioning
EXPLAINTION  Aggrieved by the order of NCLT in favor of V.BAKSHI,MIPL
decided to take matter to NCLAT
 Before the verdict of NCLAT ,both parties told that they were
worked on an out of court settlement (may 2019)
 • Whether civil courts had jurisdiction to entertain a dispute arising
from an agreement wherein parties had agreed to resolve their
disputes through arbitration.

ISSUES • Under which circumstances can an anti-arbitration injunction be

granted by a civil court under the doctrine of forum non
conveniens.
  Forum non-conveniens
 Anti-Arbitration Injunctions
JUDGMENT  Jurisdiction of the Civil Court
(VERDICT  Waiver of the arbitration clause
2019,MAY)  “The battle runs for 6 year finally NCLAT agree for the out court
AND settlement and ask both parties to submit affidavit and now
V.BAKSHI is finally out from MCDONOLD”
CONTENTIONS
THANK YOU