Professional Documents
Culture Documents
‘I’ IS ANOTHER:
AUTOBIOGRAPHY
ACROSS GENRES
Camelia Elias
first person singular
• autobiography is only to be trusted
when it reveals something disgraceful
(Orwell)
• autobiographical topics:
devised out of personal interest
in line with one’s highest authority
the result of an irresistible longing for
confidential expansion (Leslie Stephen)
autobiographer, writer, reader
• the best autobiographies draw on the art of
introspection
• art and autobiography are antithetical: the better the
artist the poorer the autobiographer
• ‘true’ artists don’t believe in autobiography
• reader response:
the ideal reader the pleasure in reading
autobiographical work is in catching the
autobiographer out in suspicious reticences, self-
serving misperceptions, cover-ups, clever deceptions.
the intelligent reader reads for the facts and for
the lies (lies are better than facts)
autobiography as self-biography
through fragment
• Epstein’s taxonomy:
nickels
dimes
essays
memoirs
anecdotes
• paradox: the fragmentary form is
more suitable for a narrative that is
otherwise linear
autobiographical ironies (Epstein)
• reading autobiography doesn’t
increase the hope for the human
race, but
• it lends amusement in watching it all
pass in review
• it makes a generational statement:
one is never too old to express
resentment against one’s parents
traditions
• American: extrapolate from the particular
in order to make a general statement
autobiography is read particularly for its
capability to make generalizations
‘size matters’, greatness now
• English: go from the general to the
particular
use the common-sense of the individual
‘concentrated thought’, posterity matters
Anthony Burgess, You’ve Had Your
Time, 1990
• “I don’t boast about the quality of my
work, but I may be permitted to pride
myself, on the gift of steady
application … the gift of
concentrations stays with me, and it
is perhaps my only gift”
the construction of family vs. the
construction of language to represent
family