disposable income that is not saved by an individual or an entity. Aggregate consumption is the sum total of all expenditure on current consumption of goods and services, i.e. those which are consumed during the current period; for example food, clothing, fuel, rent, etc. At low levels of Income Consumption income, almost the (Y) C = f(Y) entire income is 0 20 spent on current consumption. As 60 70 the income level 120 120 increases, some 180 170 income is kept 240 220 aside for saving. 300 270 360 320 Consumption expenditure may be related to either national income or disposable income, that is personal income minus direct taxes. It is one of the most important relationships in macro economics. Living standards are usually correlated to per capita consumption of goods and services. This is obtained by dividing aggregate consumption by population. Consumption function The consumption function or propensity to consume refers to income consumption relationship. It is a “functional relationship between two aggregates, i.e., total consumption and gross national income.” Symbolically, the relationship is represented as C=f(Y), where C is consumption, Y is income, and f is the functional relationship between C and Y. This relationship is based on the ceteris paribus assumption, as such only the income consumption relationship is considered and all possible influences on consumption as held constant. The consumption function has two technical attributes or properties: The Average Propensity to Consume: The average propensity to consume may be defined as the ratio of consumption expenditure to any particular level of income. It is found by dividing consumption expenditure by income, or APC=C/Y. It is expressed as the percentage or proportion of income consumed. The Marginal Propensity to Consume: The marginal propensity to consume may be defined as the ratio of the change in consumption to the change in income or as the rate of change in the average propensity to consume as income changes. It can be found by dividing change in consumption by a change in income, or MPC=Change in Consumption Change in Income Saving An expression of the extent to which people save money instead of spending it. The Saving Function shows desired saving at each income level. The saving function is the counterpart of the consumption function. It states that the relationship between income and saving. Saving is also the function of disposable income. S=f(Y) Y=C+S. Consumption and saving functions are counterparts of one another. Therefore, if one of the functions is known, the other can be easily obtained. Marginal propensity to save, which is the fraction of additional income that people save. Since people either save or consume additional income, the sum of the marginal propensity to save and the marginal propensity to consume should equal one.
The value of the marginal propensity to consume should be
greater than zero and less than one. A value of zero would indicate that none of additional income would be spent; all would be saved. A value greater than one would mean that if income increased by Re 1.00, consumption would go up by more than a rupee, which would be unusual behavior. For some people a mpc of 1 is reasonable, meaning that they spend every additional rupee they get, but this is not true for all people, so if we want a consumption function that tells us what people on the average do, a value less than one is reasonable. Significance of Consumption function The MPC is the rate of change in the APC. When income increases, the MPC falls but more than APC. On the contrary, when income falls, the MPC rises and the APC also rises but at a slower rate than the former. MPC is useful in the short run analysis and APC is useful in the long run analysis. When income increases the whole of it is not spent on consumption. On the contrary, when the income falls, consumption expenditure does not decline in the same proportion and never becomes zero. 0<MPC<1, is of great analytical and practical significance. This tells us that consumption is an increasing function of income and it increases by less than the increment of income, The theoretical possibility of general over production or ‘under employment equilibrium’, The relative stability of a highly developed industrial economy. It is implied that the gap between income and consumption at all high levels of income is too wide to be easily filled by investment with the possible consequence that the economy may fluctuate around an under employment equilibrium. Thus the economic significance of the MPC lies in filling the gap between income and consumption through planned investment to maintain the desired level of income. Further, its importance lies in the multiplier theory. The higher the MPC, the higher the multiplier and vice versa. The MPC is low in the case of the rich people and low in the case of poor people. This accounts for high MPC in underdeveloped countries and low in advanced countries. Investment Investment is the investing of money or capital in order to gain profitable returns, as interest, income, or appreciation in value. It is related to saving or deferring consumption. Investment is involved in many areas of the economy, such as business management and finance no matter for households, firms, or governments. But this is not real investment because it is simply a transfer of existing assets. Hence this is called financial investment which does not affect aggregate spending. In Keynesian terminology, investment refers to real investment which adds to capital investment. It leads to increase in level of income and by increasing the production and purchase of capital goods. Investment thus includes new plant and equipment, construction of public works like dams, roads, buildings, etc., net foreign investment, inventories, and stocks and shares of new companies. Capital, on the other hand, refers to real assets like factories, plants, equipment, and inventories of finished and semi finished goods. It is any previously produced input that can be used in the production process to produce other goods. To be more precise, investment is the production or acquisition of real capital assets during any period of time. Gross investment is the total amount spent on new capital assets in a year. Net investment is gross investment minus depreciation and obsolescence charges. This is the net addition to the existing capital stock of the economy. Investment function explains how the changes in national income induce changes in investment patterns in the national economy. Multiplier Multiplier is referred as the manifold increase in employment, as a result of initial increase in investment. – F.A.Kahn. Keynes propounded the concept of investment multiplier with reference to the much larger increase in total income, direct as well as indirect, as a result of original increase in investment. Kahn’s multiplier is known as “employment multiplier.” Keynes’ multiplier is known as “investment or income multiplier.” The essence of multiplier is the total increase in income, output or employment is manifold the original increase in investment. For example, if investment equal to Rs 100 crores is made, then the income will not rise by Rs 100 crores only but a multiple of it. If as a result of investment of Rs 100 crores, national income increases by Rs 300 crores, multiplier is equal to 3. The investment multiplier is, therefore, the ratio of increment in income to the increment in investment. k= delta Y delta I Where k is multiplier; Y is income and I is investment. Limiting cases of the value of Multiplier One limiting case occurs when the marginal propensity to consume is equal to one, that is, when the whole of the increment in income is consumed and nothing is saved. In this case, the size of the multiplier will be equal to infinity, that is, a small increase in investment will bring about a very large increase in income and employment so that full employment is reached and even the process goes beyond that. The other limiting case occurs when marginal propensity to consume is equal to zero, that is, when nothing out of the increment in income is consumed, and the whole increment in income is saved. In this case, the value of the multiplier will be equal to one. That is, in this case, the increment in income will be equal to the original increase in investment and not a multiple of it. Assumptions to Multiplier Theory MPC remains constant throughout as the income increases in various rounds of consumption expenditure. There is a net increase in investment in a period and no other further indirect effects on investment in that period occur or if they occur they have been taken into account so that there is a given net increase in investment. There is no time lag between the increase in investment and the resultant increment in income. That is, increment in income takes place instantaneously as a result of increment in investment. Excess capacity exists in the consumer goods industries. So that when the demand for them increases, more amounts of consumer goods can be produced to meet this demand. If there is no excess capacity in consumer goods industries, the increase in demand as a result of some original increase in investment will bring about rise in prices, rather than increases in real income, output and employment. Imports are important leakage from the multiplier process and we have ignored them in our above analysis for the purpose of simplicity. Leakages in the Multiplier Process Payment of debt. People hold a part of their increment in income as idle cash balances and do not use it for consumption, they also constitute leakage in the multiplier process and reduces the size of the multiplier. In an open economy as is usually the case, a part of increment in income spent on the imports of consumer goods. Taxation is another important leakage in the multiplier process. Increase in prices constitutes another important leakage in the working of the multiplier process in real terms. When output of consumer goods cannot be easily increased, a part of the increases in the money income and aggregate demand raises prices of the goods rather than their output. Therefore, the multiplier is reduced to the extent of price inflation.