Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Quality Assurance
Cost of Quality
Control Charts
Fishbone diagram
Quality Pioneers
Pareto Chart
Design of experiments
Processes required to ensure that the project will satisfy the needs for which it
was undertaken
• Plan Quality (Planning)
• Perform Quality Assurance (Executing)
• Perform Quality Control (Monitoring & Controlling)
Quality Definitions:
• The degree to which a set of inherent characteristics fulfills requirements
• Conformance to requirements
• Fitness for use – Produce what was said to be produced and what gets produced must
satisfy the real need
Cost
Costof
ofpreventing
preventingmistakes
mistakesisisalways
alwaysmuch
muchless
lessthan
thancost
costof
of
correcting
correctingthem,
them,hence
hencePrevention
Preventionisisalways
alwaysbetter
betterthan
than
Inspection
Inspection
Involves identifying which quality standards are relevant to the project and
determining how to satisfy them
Should be performed in parallel with the other project planning processes
Quality
Qualityisis planned,
planned,designed
designedand
andbuilt
built in
in ––Not
Not
inspected
inspectedin
in
The
Thedefinition
definitionof
ofacceptance
acceptancecriteria
criteriacan
cansignificantly
significantlyincrease
increaseor
or
decrease
decreaseproject
projectquality
qualitycosts
costs
Schedule Baseline
• Accepted schedule performance measures including start date and end date
Risk Register
• Information on threats and opportunities that may impact quality requirements
Impact of Poor Quality – Increased cost, decreased productivity, increased risk, increased cost
of tracking and monitoring
The cost of conformance is always lower than the cost of non-conformance !!
Control Charts
• Used to determine whether or not a process is stable and has predictable performance
• Covered in later in this presentation
Statistical Sampling
• Choosing a part of population of interest for inspection
• Sample size and frequency are planned
Flowcharting
• Graphical representation of process steps and their inter-relationships
Proprietary QM Methodologies
• Six sigma, TQM, CMMi etc (Covered in later in this presentation)
Additional Quality Planning Tools
• Brain storming, Force field analysis, Affinity diagrams, Nominal group techniques, etc
Low
LowGrade
Gradeisisacceptable,
acceptable,but
butnot
notlow
lowQuality
Quality
Continuous
ContinuousProcess
ProcessImprovement
Improvementreduces
reduceswaste
waste
and
andnon-value-added
non-value-addedactivities
activities
Quality
Qualitystandards
standardsinclude
includeproject
projectprocesses
processesand
andproduct
productgoals
goals
PREVENTION INSPECTION
Keeping errors out of the process Keeping errors out of the hands of customers
VARIABLES SAMPLING
ATTRIBUTE SAMPLING
Result is rated on a continuous scale that
The results Conform or Does not conform
measures degree of conformity
SPECIAL CAUSES
RANDOM / COMMON CAUSES
Unusual events (also known as assignable
Normal process variation
causes)
CONTROL LIMITS
TOLERANCE (Specification limits)
Derived from the performance
Set by the Customer, Regulatory bodies,
standards’ bodies, and Organization Process is in control if results fall within the control
limits
Project management plan Cause and Effect diagram Quality control measurements
Quality Metrics Control charts Validated changes
Quality Checklists Flow-charting Validated deliverables
Work performance information Histogram Organization process assets
Approved change requests Pareto chart (updates)
Not defined
Ill-maintained
Methodology Machine
Inspection
Inspectionisisalso
alsoaaT&T
T&Tof
ofScope
ScopeVerification
Verification
Control
Controlcharts
chartscan
canbe
beused
usedfor
forboth
bothProject
Projectand
andProduct
Productlife
lifecycle
cycle
processes
processes
Typically ± 3σ
R
A
N
G
E
Results Lower Control Limit (LCL)
Typically ± 3σ
TIME
N
O
R Upper Control Limit
M
A
L
V
A
R
I
A
T
I Results Lower Control Limit
O
N
TIME
UCL
LCL
Rejects
TIME
UCL
R
A
N
G LCL
E
Lower Specification Limit
Accepted
TIME
R
A
N
G
E
Lower Control Limit
TIME
R
A
N
G
E
Lower Control Limit
TIME
20%
10
10%
0 0%
D B A C E F I
Number of Defects % of Total
Rank
Rankordering
orderingisisused
usedto
toguide
guidecorrective
correctiveaction
action
End
All
Allprocess
processflowcharts
flowchartsshow
showactivities,
activities,decision
decisionpoints,
points,and
andthe
the
order
orderof
ofprocessing
processing
PMBOK Workshop | Financial Services
All work described was performed by Capgemini or a Capgemini affiliate
© 2009 Ca 36
Tools & Techniques – Perform Quality Control
6
Statistical Sampling
• Choosing part of a population for inspection
• Appropriate sampling can help reduce cost of inspection and quality control
Example:
• Randomly selecting 5 projects from a list of 60 for an audit
Appropriate
AppropriateSampling
Samplingcan
canreduce
reducethe
thecost
costof Quality Control
of Quality Control
________________________
Project Std. Dev = √ sum of the task variances
Normal Distribution
SIGMA
SIGMA 11 == 68.26
68.26
22 == 95.46
95.46
33 == 99.73
99.73
66 == 99.99
99.99
Memorize
68% of the area under any normal curve lies within 1 standard
deviation from the mean
95.5% of that area lies within 2 standard deviations from the mean
99.7% of that area lies within 3 standard deviations from the mean
or characteristic of problem/situation
80
• Height of columns represent relative
frequency of characteristic 60
0
D B A C E F I G J H
Number of Defects
Rank
Rankordering
orderingisisused
usedto
toguide
guidecorrective
correctiveaction
action
15.0%
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
-5.0%
Weeks
Schedule Variance Linear (Schedule Variance)
60 Scatter diagram
50
undetected defects
40
30
20
10
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Hours in review
Makes sure you are doing the right Makes sure the results of what you've
things, the right way done are what you expected
As the project manager on a large defense project, you find that there
are an unexpectedly large amount of quality problems on your project.
You decide that your best approach is to focus on the root cause of the
problems. Which would be the best tool for you to use:
• A. Trend analysis
• B. Ishikawa diagram
• C. Pareto chart
• D. Control chart
Deming
Juran
Crosby
Taguchi
Gold Plating
Six Sigma
Continuous
Improvement
Standards Proprietary Approach Non-Proprietary Approach
Juran – Quality
improvement, planning and Just-In-Time
control
W. E. Deming
Pioneered the use of statistics and sampling methods in the 1920’s as
30’s
Was influenced by Shewhart (plan-do-check-act cycle)
According to Deming:
85% of quality problems required
managers to make corrective actions
15% of quality problems were errors that
workers or team members could control
Joseph M. Juran
Developed the “Juran Trilogy”: quality improvement, quality planning,
quality control
Emphasized the importance of products being fit for customers’ use
Was concerned with the legal side of quality standards:
• Criminal liability
• Civil liability
• Warranties
• Appropriate corporate actions
Philip B. Crosby
Postulated that:
• Error prevention is the key to high quality
• Activities should be done correctly the first time
• Quality is conformance to requirements
• The system of quality is prevention
• The performance standard is zero defects
• The measurement of quality is the price of nonconformance
JIT (Just-in-Time)
In order to reduce inventory costs, a company may ask suppliers to
deliver just as much supplies or raw materials as are needed to satisfy
the company’s short-term needs (i.e., “just in time”)
This means that quality must be high in order to make sure that there
are enough supplies or materials needed to meet production
requirements
Gold plating
Adding tasks or components that are not in the approved scope
• The only activities that should be performed are those in the Work
Breakdown Structure
• Gold plating adds ZERO value to the project
• PMs should concentrate on conforming to requirements, and nothing
else
• Gold plating does not add to quality
Normal Distribution
SIGMA
SIGMA 11 == 68.26
68.26
22 == 95.46
95.46
33 == 99.73
99.73
66 == 99.99
99.99
Memorize
68% of the area under any normal curve lies within 1 standard
deviation from the mean
95.5% of that area lies within 2 standard deviations from the mean
99.7% of that area lies within 3 standard deviations from the mean
ISO 9000
A family of ISO (the International Organization for Standardization)
standards for quality management systems
• The standards originated in manufacturing, but are now employed
across a wide range of other types of organizations
• ISO 9000 does not guarantee the quality of end products and
services; rather, it certifies that consistent business processes are
being applied
Kaizen ( 改善 )
Japanese word for “improvement.”
• Refers to the concept of continuous improvement
• For the PMP exam know:
Kaizen is small, incremental improvements
A project manager practicing Kaizen is always looking for a way to make
things better
Quality Assurance
Cost of Quality
Control Charts
Fishbone diagram
Quality Pioneers
Pareto Chart
Design of experiments
Review Questions
www.capgemini.com/financialservices