Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Consumption Aggregate
Antecedent:
Food items
Non-Food items
Durables
Housing
Consequent:
Price adjustment (Session II)
Food Items
In general is a straightforward aggregation exercise
Sugar
Self-reported ration prices 1.476
Unit values from diary 1.493
Unit values for commercial wheat flour 1.493
Recommendation based on these principles
and discussions with experts
Only price available is “What price would you pay in the market
to buy the ..[ITEM].. of same quality?”
As these were in effect, collected by enumerators by visiting the
ration agent in the cluster, these are closer to a price survey
But variations may reflect noise, uncertainty, local variations in
supply and demand
Need to ensure that all those who consume exactly the same
amount of a ration item are assigned the same expenditure; and
that this expenditure increases with higher consumption
Recommendation: Use national median values of prices reported
by ration agents.
Non-Food items
Wide range of non-food items
Collected on daily-use as well as other less frequent purchased
items
Different reference periods often used, so make them comparable
Computation is straightforward but difficulties in the choice of
which items to include
General considerations:
Avoid lumpy expenditure (i.e. large and infrequent: weddings, birth,
funerals, among others)
Avoid items for which is hard to estimate accurately (i.e. public
goods and leisure)
Distinguish between investments and consumption
Avoid double counting: transfers to other households
Non-Food items
In general include:
Frequently purchases goods and services (e.g. soap, cooking
fuel, personal care, recreation, transport, supplies)
Less frequent but regularly purchased items (e.g. clothing,
kitchen equipment, textiles, household items)
In general, exclude:
Business-related expenses
Large occasional expenditures
Remittances paid; gifts and transfers out
Taxes paid
Repayment of loans, interest payments, purchase of financial
assets
Non-Food items
Health
These expenditures are generally excluded because…
They can be lumpy (i.e. large occasional expenditure)
It is not a welfare enhancing: inability to measure the loss of welfare
associated with being sick which is ameliorated by health expenditures
But we miss the difference between sick individuals: one who
can afford health care and other who can not
Education
Can be lumpy
Can be considered as investment rather than consumption
However, these are not irregular as health expenditure (regular
at a particular point in the life-cycle)
III. Treatment of Outliers
Outliers
Definition
How to deal with “gross” outliers?
There is no straightforward rule to follow except…
Paying attention to what data shows (i.e. maintain a
“reasonable” dispersion) and
Magnitude of the change you are imposing with the correction
method
Use more than one rule: graphs such as histograms and
automatic corrections
Outliers
Few examples:
Not only isolated outliers but also groups of outliers
Units have been misinterpreted for instance, eggs measured in units
for some households and dozens for others
Spatial disparities
If there are significant regional disparities across the country then
correction must NOT be made at national level
Temporal disparities
Correcting quantities consumed by households independently of when
they do it may squeeze the distribution
Outliers
Automatic rule example of detection of outliers for unit
values
Eliminate those whose logarithm lie more than 2.5 standard
deviations from the mean of logarithms
Again this DOES NOT remove the need for graphical
inspection and reasonable judgment of the analyst
Strictly Confidential © 2014