Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Clive Phillips
Centre for Animal Welfare and Ethics
(CAWE)
1. Changes in animal welfare interest
• I can:
– identify them in myself
– sometimes recognise them in others
– inadequately describe them
– occasionally impute their existence in other
animals
Mental experiences
‘It is not necessary to assume that such
mental experiences (of animals) are at all
similar to those which a person might have
under analogous circumstances’
Griffin (1981)
• Increased suffering
• Public concern
• Growing volume of scientific research in
animal welfare
• Attention paid by the media
Increased numbers of animals
suffering and scale of suffering
• Increased world meat and milk
consumption
• More reliance on small animals
• More intensive production systems,
especially of poultry and cattle
• Increased live trade
• Increased animal production in developing
countries without animal welfare standards
Historical development of social reform
1790-1830 Rights of the common man
(Bill of Rights, slavery abolished)
1889 Children’s rights acknowledged
1880-1920 Women’s rights championed
1950-1990 Ethnic minorities’ rights
1970 – 2000 Disabled/gay people’s rights
1980 –? Animal rights and the need to
improve animal welfare
No. ‘Animal Welfare’ journal
publications 1995-2004
Traditional model of Animal Welfare
Pressure Group function
AWPG
Lobby
Government
Regulate
Industry
New model of AWPG activity
Identify an
Develop a
issue
slogan
$ ← Create a
solution
Encourage
Make someone public
responsible
debate
$
Features of successful campaigns
• Focus on one small aspect of animal
industry
• Achievable goal
• Easy to understand
• Easily portrayed as:
– unnatural
– cruel
– result of human greed
– lack of human care
Industry actions
• Engage in discussions with AWPGs and
government
• Train animal managers and develop/promote
management guidelines and Codes of
Practice or Standards and Guidelines
• Conduct research for strategic action
Aspects of particular concern
1) Unnaturalness
2) Intensification and scale
→
Industry changes in intensity and scale
Industry World population
Farming
Cattle/sheep 4 billion
Pigs/poultry 55 billion
Companions 1-2 billion
Laboratory 50 million
Zoo 1 million
Entertain/work 100 million
Wild many billion
Cognitive dissonance – myth or reality?
Animal
ethics
↑
Professional
ethics
Personal
Society
ethics ethics
3) Cruelty
4) Result of human greed
• Attitudes to lab animals used for medicines
and cosmetics
• Link between diet and obesity
5) Lack of human care
e.g. overseas
handling and
slaughter
Human factors influencing
animal welfare concern
• Affluence
• Gender
• Proximity to agricultural production
• Culture/race
Assessing welfare at farm level
- practical issues
The welfare curve
Welfare
Battery cages
Extensive versus intensive –
how do we assess welfare?
The Five Freedoms: the battery hen
Freedom Assessment
Hunger and Adequate – although possible metabolic
thirst hunger due to genetic selection for high
production
Discomfort Very poor – wire floors, poor air quality
Pain, injury and Adequate in house, very poor during
disease removal – bone fractures
To express Very poor – inability to move, wing flap,
normal behaviour nest, forage or dust bath
Fear and distress Good in house; very poor during removal
from houses – bone fractures
How do we assess welfare?
How do we assess welfare?
Five Freedoms: What do we look
for?
Freedom Assessment of:
from:
Hunger and Metabolic needs
thirst
Gut physiological
requirements
Feed palatability
Body condition
How do we assess welfare?
Five Freedoms: What do we look for?
Freedom Assessment of:
from:
Discomfort Air quality
Air quantity
Thermal comfort
Physical comfort
Light – levels and
programmes
Assessing temperature by bird
behaviour
How do we assess welfare?
Five Freedoms: What do we look for?
Freedom from: Assessment of:
Pain, injury and Veterinary programme
disease
Genetic selection
Mutilations and vet procedures
Treatment facilities
Euthanasia
Biosecurity
How do we assess welfare?
Five Freedoms: What do we look for?