Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MANAGEMENT
CHAPTER 8
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
relate the evolution of strategic management;
ALFRED CHANDLER
He recognized the importance of coordinating the various aspects of management under one
umbrella strategy, which is strategic management today.
1957 : The matching of the organization's internal factors and the external environmental
circumstances was introduced.
PHILIP SELZNICK
He was professor of sociology and law at the University of California, Berkeley. A noted author in
organizational theory, sociology of law and public administration, he wrote such books as The Moral
Commonwealth, TVA and the Grass Roots, and Leadership in Administration.
PETER DRUCKER
Peter Ferdinand Drucker was an Austrian-born American management consultant, educator, and author,
whose writings contributed to the philosophical and practical foundations of the modern business
corporation
ELLEN-EARIE CHAFFEE
Senior Fellow for the Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges (AGB), and past
director of its Lumina Foundation funded projects on Strategic Finance Governance for Student Success.
President of Valley City State University (15 years) and president of Mayville State University (9 years),
GROWTH AND PORTFOLIO
THEORY
• 1960. It spanned 19 years of learning the effects of market share. This attempt started
with General Electric then moved to Harvard in the early 1970s. Then, it moved to
Strategic Planning Institute in the late 1970s. By that time, companies had now
developed a link between profitability and strategy.
• The growing interest on profitability, market share and strategy led to the awareness on
growth strategies. There were discussions on horizontal and vertical integration,
diversification, franchises, mergers and acquisitions, joint venture, and organic growth.
Another study led to the competition and the environment through market dominance
strategies.
• While a bigger market share led to higher profits, Schumacher (1973), Woo and Cooper
(1982) and Levenson (1984) proved otherwise, and later Traverso (2002) with what is
now called niche marketing. Creating a niche can result in very high returns.
• 1980s, there were also paradoxical conclusions that high market share and low market
share were often very profitable but those in between were not. This seeming irony was
explained by MICHAEL PORTER in the 1980s.
• Portfolio theory
This theory was developed by Harry Markowitz. This propagated the concept that a broad
portfolio of financial assets could reduce risk exposure of companies. In the '70s, other
theorists extended it to operating division portfolios, An OPERATING DIVISION is also called
strategic business unit. Each has its own revenue, cost, objectives, and strategies.
In the 1950s and 1960s, sales orientation was conceptualized. The concentration was the art of
selling. After a product is produced, a highcaliber sales force can sell it.
In the 1970s, Theodore Levitt theorized that business should start with the customers
instead of producing the product first before selling it. A company should find out what they want
and produce it for them. This is now called marketing orientation. Several terms were used to
reflect a market-oriented concept. They were customer intimacy, customer orientation, marketing
philosophy, customer focus, customer driven, among others.
THE RISE OF JAPANESE-ORIENTED MANAGEMENT
STYLE
During the '70s they saw the rise of the Japanese industry as well. Japanese firms surpassed American
and European companies including steel, watches, cameras, automobiles, and electronics.
4. After the Second World War, Japan became a highly productive and capital intensive
organization.
5. Exports prevailed.
At that time, American companies were not yet ready to embrace the role of corporate culture,
shared values and beliefs in the success of an organization. Pascale also believed that Japanese
businesses had long-term plans in contrast with American companies.
KENICHI OHMAE, head of McKinsey and Co., Tokyo Office released the book;
In Search of Excellence, which was a response to Ohmae's book. They studied 62 companies and
rated them in a six-performance criteria—must be above 50% in four out of the six criteria performance
metrics for 20 years. Based on this study, 43 companies passed the test and came up with eight keys to
succeed:
1. CUSTOMER FOCUS. The company should know and understand the customers.
2. ACTION-ORIENTED. The company should implement the strategies not just mere paperwork
and plans without action.
3. ENTREPRENEURSHIP. The company should exude an entrepreneurial spirit: innovate and
create.
4. SIMPLICITY. Managers should be simple and should not make things too complex.
5. STICK TO WHAT THE COMPANY KNOWS BEST. The company should continue in the field
where it excels.
6. VALUE-ORIENTED MANAGEMENT. Management advocates corporate values throughout
the organization.
7. PEOPLE-ORIENTED. The company should respect and motivate its people and in turn, they
will be productive at work.
8. CENTRALIZE AND DECENTRALIZE. The company centralizes its control but also allows
autonomy in each business unit.
J. Rehfeld (1994) discussed the importance of transformation of knowledge from various cultures to a
management style to compete globally. The Japanese style kaizen had not been successful in the United
States unless it was modified to suit American culture.
THE COMPETITIVE EDGE
Richard Lester
1. Continuous improvements in cost, quality, service and
product innovation done on a simultaneous basis;
2. Breaking down organizational barriers between
departments;
3. Eliminating layers of management to make it leaner
and simpler;
4. Closer relationships with customers and suppliers;
5. Intelligent use of new technology;
6. Global focus; and
7. Improving human resource skills'
Theorists like w. Edwards Deming, Joseph Juran, A. Kearney, Philip
Crosby, and Armand Feignbaum developed quality improvement
techniques like Total Quality Management, Continuous improvement,
Lean Manufacturing, Six Sigma, and Return on Quality.
James Gilmore and Joseph pine had mass customization concept. They
explained it further in the book, The Experience Economy which allowed
for a company to individualize a product for each customer without losing
economies of scale' Bernd Schmitt expanded it further to customer
experience management.
James Collins and Jerry Porras believed in core values that would make
the company last.
Arie de Geus (1997)
1. Sensitivity to the business
environment.
2. Cohesion and identity.
3. Tolerance and decentralization.
4. Conservative financing.
PHILIP KOTLER,
a marketing guru is a well-known proponent of marketing warfare
strategy with his books in marketing management. The theories are
divided into offensive marketing warfare strategies, defensive
marketing warfare strategies, flanking marketing warfare strategies,
and guerrilla marketing warfare strategies.
1983
1998
HENRY MINTZBERG developed strategic planning with five types
of strategies.
CHAOS THEORY deals with turbulent systems. Axelrod, R. , Holland J., and
Kelly S. and Allison M.A. call these systems of multiple actions complex adaptive
systems.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY-ORIENTED STRATEGY
1985
DANIEL BELL examined the sociological consequences of information technology. GLORIA SCHUCK and
SHOSHANA ZUBOFF identified the psychological facets.
1990
PETER SENGE collaborated with ARIE DE GEUS and theorized the importance of the use of
information it-I the success Of the organization. Senge identified five components of a learning
organization.
Mental models.
There is a need to explore the individual mental capacities of each one in the organization.
Shared vision.
The visions are cascaded and communicated to all the employees in the organization.
Team learning.
Employees learn through teams.
Systems thinking.
It is also called SYNERGY. It is looking at the organization as a whole rather than per individual
employee.
THOMAS STEWART uses the term intellectual capital to describe the
investment of the organization in knowledge. This comprises of human-capital
(knowledge of employees), customer capital (knowledge of customers), and
structural capital (knowledge that resides in the capital itself).
- PETER DRUCKER