Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DO NOW – Welcome
– Class Community
Please complete one of the – Tung et al Case Study
Class Community Discussion
Agreements reflection – Break
prompts. (You are welcome – Methodological
to do more than one) Readings Discussion
– Ethics & Politics
– Closure
www.gse.harvard.edu
Class
Community
S-529 Case Study Research Methods
02/05/2016
S-529 Case Study Research Methods
Class Session 2: Class Community
FACILITATION GROUPS
www.gse.harvard.edu
Promising Practices &
Unfinished Business
S-529 Case Study Research Methods
02/05/2016
S-529 Case Study Research Methods
Class Session 2: Promising Practices & Unfinished Business
Guiding Questions
• What kind (exploratory, explanatory,
descriptive) of case study is this?
What are the research questions
guiding this study?
• Describe the logic of selecting the
cases (schools) for this case study as
it relates to the purpose of the study
and the research questions.
• Why have two sets (Indicator
Framework and Theoretical Lenses)
of theory?
www.gse.harvard.edu
S-529 Case Study Research Methods
Class Session 2: Promising Practices & Unfinished Business
www.gse.harvard.edu
S-529 Case Study Research Methods
Class Session 2: Promising Practices & Unfinished Business
www.gse.harvard.edu
S-529 Case Study Research Methods
Class Session 2: Promising Practices & Unfinished Business
Pros and cons of all the different terminology (classification/type of case, disciplinary
orientations, end products), and how do these differences matter?
Generalizability
– Is it even necessary?
– What does it mean to generalize to theoretical models vs. populations?
– Generalizability claims made by researcher vs. responsibility of reader to determine
relevance/significance (transferability)
Subjectivity
– What does this mean that subjectivity should be “monitored and disciplined”
– Where/what point in research process and report should subjective bias(es) be
articulated?
Next week:
• Design limitations
• Findings and claims;
transferability
• The report (format, narrative
strength)
• Uses of this research
• Other questions and critical
reflections
www.gse.harvard.edu
Ethics & Politics
S-529 Case Study Research Methods
02/05/2016
S-529 Case Study Research Methods
Class Session 2: Ethics & Politics
Ownership, Control, Access, and Possession (OCAP) or Self-
Determination Applied to Research
Dominant Frame Counterpoint
Researcher/Research as central subject “The Researched” as central subject
Research is good Research as harm
Research as “pure” science Research has benefits (for some)
Protection of researched individuals Protection of researched
communities
www.gse.harvard.edu
S-529 Case Study Research Methods
Class Session 2: Ethics & Politics
Key Concepts
• Principles of self-determination AND political responses to research,
knowledge production and information management
• Ownership
• Control
• Access
• Possession
• List of 30 recurring grievances about research and researchers
• The pressures on researchers vs. requirements of ethical research
• List of 11 more respectful and ethical approaches to research
www.gse.harvard.edu
S-529 Case Study Research Methods
Class Session 2: Ethics & Politics
Key Questions
1) Which of these key concepts resonate, and which do you find problematic or
hard to accept?
2) How might some of these key concepts apply in your research context?
3) How have any of these key concepts surfaced in your own experience (action
and/or reflection) as a researcher? As a reader of research? As a researched
person/member of a researched community?
4) Name some power(s), mechanisms of control, and sources of authority that you
possess as a researcher. Which have you used, or plan to use?
Ethics & Politics Facilitation Partner Discussion
Discuss one or more of the key questions (or another topic related to OCAP) of
interest to you.
Be ready to share a highlight from your discussion.
www.gse.harvard.edu
Closure
S-529 Case Study Research Methods
02/05/2016
S-529 Case Study Research Methods
Class Session 2: Closure
FEEDBACK:
www.gse.harvard.edu