Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ch 3 -1
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
• The Nature of external • Forecasting tools and
audit process techniques
• Key external factors • External Factor
• Sources of external Evaluation Matrix (EFE)
information • Competitive Profile
• Porter’s 5 Forces Model Matrix (CPM)
of Competition
Ch 3 -2
A COMPREHENSIVE STRATEGIC-MANAGEMENT MODEL – AT WHAT
STAGE IS THE EXTERNAL ASSESSMENT IN THE STRATEGIC MODEL
3-3
EXTERNAL ASSESSMENT
Ch 3 -4
THE NATURE OF EXTERNAL
ASSESSMENT/AUDIT/ANALYSIS
The • Allow companies to
primary purpose of external identify key variables that
analysis is to determine the offer actionable responses
opportunities and threats in that companies will take
an industry or any segment towards profitability, growth
that will drive profitability, and volatility
growth, and volatility. • Enable companies to
formulating strategies that
What companies do at this take advantage of external
stage is to conduct: opportunities or that
Environmental Scanning minimize the impact of
potential threats.
Industry Analysis
Ch 3 -5
THE KEY EXTERNAL FACTORS - 5 BROAD CATEGORIES
SURROUNDING COMPANIES OR INDUSTRIES (the 10 key factors)
Ch 3 -6
SOME EXAMPLES OF THE KEY FORCES
Ch 3 -12
THE PROCESS OF PERFORMING AN
EXTERNAL AUDIT
3-13
INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION (I/O) VIEW
MICHAEL PORTER, THE
WHAT IS I/O? PROPENENT OF THIS VIEW
• It is a practical framework for • Proponents of the I/O view,
gathering, assimilating, and such as Michael Porter,
contend that organizational
analyzing external performance will be primarily
information. determined by industry
forces, such as falling gas
• It advocates that external prices that no single firm can
(industry) factors are more control.
important than internal ones • Porter’s Five-Forces Model is
for gaining and sustaining an example of the I/O
perspective, which focuses on
competitive advantage. analyzing external forces and
• In short industries industry variables as a basis
performances are determined by for getting and keeping
competitive advantage.
industry forces/properties
Ch 3 -14
THE INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION
(I/O) VIEW
• Firm performance is
based more on
industry properties
3-15
TRENDS
Ch 3 -16
KEY SOCIAL, CULTURAL, DEMOGRAPHIC, AND
NATURAL ENVIRONMENT VARIABLES
3-17
TRENDS TECHNOLOGICAL
The technology mainly the use of Internet
has changed the very nature of opportunities
Political, Governmental, and threats by:
and Legal Forces
altering the life cycles of products,
• The increasing global increasing the speed of distribution,
creating new products and services,
interdependence erasing limitations of traditional geographic
among economies, markets,
markets, governments, changing the historical trade-off between
and organizations production standardization and flexibility
makes it imperative that Create new markets, new improved
products, renders some products and
firms consider the services to be obsolete
possible impact of
political variables on COMPANIES CREATE NEW POSITIONS and the
the formulation and people hired are required to
implementation of Gather and obtain vital information and to
formulate, implement, and evaluate strategies is
competitive strategies available where and when it is needed
Ch 3 -18
COMPETITIVE FORCES
COMPANIES NEED TO LOOK INTO
3-20
PORTER’S THE FIVE- 1. Identify key aspects or
FORCES MODEL OF elements of each
COMPETITION
competitive force that
impact the firm.
2. Evaluate how strong
and important each
element is for the firm.
3. Decide whether the
collective strength of the
elements is worth the
firm entering or staying
in the industry.
3-21
PORTER’S THE FIVE-FORCES MODEL OF COMPETITION
– Barriers to entry
– Most powerful of are important*
the five forces – Quality, pricing,
– Focus on and marketing can
competitive overcome barriers
advantage of
strategies over
other firms
Ch 3 -22
BARRIERS TO ENTRY*
Ch 3 -23
3. Potential development of substitute
products
Ch 3 -25
FORECASTING TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES
Ch 3 -26
EXTERNAL FACTOR EVALUATION (EFE) MATRIX
• allows strategists to
summarize and evaluate 1. List key external
EXTERNAL FACTORS factors
SUCH AS 2. Weight from 0 to 1
• economic, social, cultural, 3. Rate effectiveness of
demographic, current strategies
environmental, political, 4. Multiply weight * rating
governmental, legal, 5. Sum weighted scores
technological, and
competitive information,
• Comprise of 5 steps Detailed can be found in
the next slide
Ch 3 -27
External Factor THE STEPS(EFE) Matrix
Evaluation
1 List 20 key external factors as identified in the external-audit process,
including both
opportunities and threats that affect the firm and its industry. List the
opportunities first and then the threats. Be specific as possible, utilize
“actionable” factors
2 Assign to each factor a weight that ranges from 0.0 (not important) to 1.0
(very important). The weight indicates the relative importance of that factor
to being successful in the firm’s industry. Opportunities often receive higher
weights than threats, but threats can receive high weights if they are
especially severe or threatening. Appropriate weights can be determined by
comparing successful with unsuccessful competitors or by discussing the
factor and reaching a group consensus. The sum of all weights assigned to
the factors must equal 1.0.
3 Assign a rating between 1 and 4 to each key external factor to indicate how
effectively the firm’s current strategies respond to the factor, where 4 = the
response is superior, 3 = the response is above average, 2 = the response is
average, and 1 = the response is poor. Ratings are based on effectiveness of
the firm’s strategies. Ratings are thus company-based, whereas the weights
in Step 2 are industry-based. It is important to note that both threats and
opportunities can receive a 1, 2, 3, or 4. Ch 3 -28
External Factor Evaluation (EFE) Matrix
THE STEPS
4 Multiply each factor’s weight by its rating to determine a
weighted score.
5 Sum the weighted scores for each variable to determine the total
weighted score for the
organization.
Ch 3 -29
EFE INDICATORS
Total weighted score of 4.0
• Organization response
is outstanding to
threats and weaknesses IMPORTANT:
Understanding the
Total weighted score of factors used in the EFE
1.0 Matrix is more
Firm’s strategies not important than the
capitalizing on
opportunities or
actual weights and
avoiding threats ratings assigned.
Ch 3 -30
EFE Matrix for a Local Ten-Theater
Cinema Complex
external
only
3-31
INDUSTRY ANALYSIS: COMPETITIVE PROFILE
MATRIX (CPM)
3-33
CHAPTER SUMMARY
Ch 3 -34