You are on page 1of 55

6-1

CHAPTER 6
Risk and Rates of Return

 Stand-alone risk
 Portfolio risk
 Risk & return: CAPM/SML

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.


6-2

What is investment risk?

Investment risk pertains to the


probability of actually earning a
low or negative return.

The greater the chance of low or


negative returns, the riskier the
investment.
Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.
6-3

Probability distribution

Firm X

Firm Y

Rate of
-70 0 15 100 Return (%)

Expected Rate of Return


Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.
6-4
Selected Realized Returns,1926-1999
Average Standard
Return Deviation
Small-company stocks 17.6% 33.6%
Large-company stocks 13.3 20.1
Long-term corporate bonds 5.9 8.7
Long-term government
bonds 5.5 9.3
U.S. Treasury bills 3.8 3.2
Source: Based on Stocks, Bonds, Bills, and Inflation: (Valuation
Edition) 2000 Yearbook (Chicago: Ibbotson Associates, 2000)
Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.
6-5

Investment Alternatives
(Given in the problem)

Economy Prob. T-Bill HT Coll USR MP


Recession 0.1 8.0% -22.0% 28.0% 10.0% -13.0%
Below avg. 0.2 8.0 -2.0 14.7 -10.0 1.0
Average 0.4 8.0 20.0 0.0 7.0 15.0
Above avg. 0.2 8.0 35.0 -10.0 45.0 29.0
Boom 0.1 8.0 50.0 -20.0 30.0 43.0
1.0

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.


6-6

Why is the T-bill return independent


of the economy?

Will return the promised 8%


regardless of the economy.

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.


6-7

Do T-bills promise a completely


risk-free return?

No, T-bills are still exposed to the


risk of inflation.
However, not much unexpected
inflation is likely to occur over a
relatively short period.

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.


6-8

Do the returns of HT and Coll. move


with or counter to the economy?

 HT: Moves with the economy, and


has a positive correlation. This is
typical.
 Coll: Is countercyclical of the
economy, and has a negative
correlation. This is unusual.
Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.
6-9

Calculate the expected rate of return


on each alternative:
^
k = expected rate of return.
n

k̂ = k P.
i =1
i i

^
kHT = (-22%)0.1 + (-2%)0.20
+ (20%)0.40 + (35%)0.20
+ (50%)0.1 = 17.4%.
Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.
6 - 10

^
k
HT 17.4%
Market 15.0
USR 13.8
T-bill 8.0
Coll. 1.7

HT appears to be the best, but is it


really?
Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.
6 - 11

What’s the standard deviation


of returns for each alternative?

 = Standard deviation.

= Variance =  2
n
=  i
(k
i 1
 k̂ ) 2
Pi .

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.


6 - 12

n
  (k
i 1
i  k̂ ) Pi .
2

 (8.0 – 8.0)20.1 + (8.0 – 8.0)20.2  1/2


 
 T-bills =  + (8.0 – 8.0)20.4 + (8.0 – 8.0)20.2 
 
 + (8.0 – 8.0) 0.1
2

T-bills = 0.0%. Coll = 13.4%.


HT = 20.0%. USR = 18.8%.
M = 15.3%.
Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.
6 - 13

Prob.
T-bill

USR
HT

0 8 13.8 17.4
Rate of Return (%)

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.


6 - 14

 Standard deviation (i) measures


total, or stand-alone, risk.
 The larger the i , the lower the
probability that actual returns will
be close to the expected return.

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.


6 - 15

Expected Returns vs. Risk

Expected
Security Return Risk, 
HT 17.4% 20.0%
Market 15.0 15.3
USR 13.8* 18.8*
T-bills 8.0 0.0
Coll. 1.7* 13.4*

*Seems misplaced.
Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.
6 - 16

Coefficient of Variation (CV)

Standardized measure of dispersion


about the expected value:
Std dev 
CV = Mean = ^ .
k

Shows risk per unit of return.

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.


6 - 17
Prob.

A B

0 Rate of Return (%)


A = B , but A is riskier because larger
probability of losses.

^ = CVA > CVB.
k
Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.
6 - 18

Portfolio Risk and Return

Assume a two-stock portfolio with


$50,000 in HT and $50,000 in
Collections.
^
Calculate kp and p.

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.


6 - 19
^
Portfolio Return, kp

^
kp is a weighted average:

n
^ ^
kp = wiki
i=1

^
kp = 0.5(17.4%) + 0.5(1.7%) = 9.6%.
^ ^ ^
kp is between kHT and kCOLL.
Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.
6 - 20

Alternative Method

Estimated Return
Economy Prob. HT Coll. Port.
Recession 0.10 -22.0% 28.0% 3.0%
Below avg. 0.20 -2.0 14.7 6.4
Average 0.40 20.0 0.0 10.0
Above avg. 0.20 35.0 -10.0 12.5
Boom 0.10 50.0 -20.0 15.0
^
kp = (3.0%)0.10 + (6.4%)0.20 + (10.0%)0.40
+ (12.5%)0.20 + (15.0%)0.10 = 9.6%.
Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.
6 - 21

1/ 2
 
 (3.0 – 9.6)20.10 
 
 + (6.4 – 9.6)20.20 
 
p =  + (10.0 – 9.6)20.40  = 3.3%.
 
 + (12.5 – 9.6)20.20 
 
 + (15.0 – 9.6)20.10 
 

CVp = 3.3% = 0.34.


9.6%
Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.
6 - 22

 p = 3.3% is much lower than that of


either stock (20% and 13.4%).
 p = 3.3% is lower than average of HT
and Coll = 16.7%.
^
 Portfolio provides average k but
lower risk.
 Reason: negative correlation.

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.


6 - 23

General statements about risk

 Most stocks are positively


correlated. rk,m  0.65.
 35% for an average stock.
 Combining stocks generally lowers
risk.

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.


6 - 24

Returns Distributions for Two Perfectly


Negatively Correlated Stocks (r = -1.0) and
for Portfolio WM

Stock W Stock M Portfolio WM


25 .
. .
25 . 25

15 . 15 . 15 . . . . .
0 0 0
. .
-10
. -10
. -10

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.


6 - 25

Returns Distributions for Two Perfectly


Positively Correlated Stocks (r = +1.0) and
for Portfolio MM’

Stock M Stock M’ Portfolio MM’


25 25 25

15 15 15

0 0 0

-10 -10 -10

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.


6 - 26

What would happen to the


riskiness of an average 1-stock
portfolio as more randomly
selected stocks were added?

p would decrease because the added


stocks would not be perfectly correlated
^ constant.
but kp would remain relatively

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.


6 - 27
Prob.
Large

0 15 Rate of Return (%)


Even with large N, p 20%
Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.
6 - 28

p (%)
35 Company-Specific Risk

Stand-Alone Risk, p

20
Market Risk

0
10 20 30 40 2,000+
# Stocks in Portfolio
Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.
6 - 29

 As more stocks are added, each


new stock has a smaller risk-
reducing impact.
 p falls very slowly after about 10
stocks are included, and after 40
stocks, there is little, if any, effect.
The lower limit for p is about 20%
= M .

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.


6 - 30

Stand-alone Market Firm-specific


risk = risk + risk

Market risk is that part of a security’s


stand-alone risk that cannot be
eliminated by diversification, and it is
measured by beta.
Firm-specific risk is that part of a
security’s stand-alone risk that can be
eliminated by proper diversification.
Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.
6 - 31

 By forming portfolios, we can


eliminate about half the riskiness
of individual stocks (35% vs. 20%).

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.


6 - 32

If you chose to hold a one-stock


portfolio and thus are exposed to
more risk than diversified investors,
would you be compensated for all
the risk you bear?

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.


6 - 33

 NO!
 Stand-alone risk as measured by a
stock’s  or CV is not important to a
well-diversified investor.
 Rational, risk-averse investors are
concerned with p , which is based
on market risk.

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.


6 - 34

 There can only be one price, hence


market return, for a given security.
Therefore, no compensation can be
earned for the additional risk of a
one-stock portfolio.

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.


6 - 35

 Beta measures a stock’s market risk.


It shows a stock’s volatility relative
to the market.

 Beta shows how risky a stock is if


the stock is held in a well-diversified
portfolio.

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.


6 - 36

How are betas calculated?

 Run a regression of past returns


on Stock i versus returns on the
market. Returns = D/P + g.
 The slope of the regression line is
defined as the beta coefficient.

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.


6 - 37
Illustration of Beta Calculation:
_
ki Regression line:
^ ^
20 . ki = -2.59 + 1.44 k M

15 . Year kM ki
10 1 15% 18%
2 -5 -10
5
3 12 16
-5 0 5 10 15 20
_
kM
-5

. -10
Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.
6 - 38

 If beta = 1.0, average stock.


 If beta > 1.0, stock riskier than
average.
 If beta < 1.0, stock less risky than
average.
 Most stocks have betas in the range
of 0.5 to 1.5.

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.


6 - 39

List of Beta Coefficients

Stock Beta
Merrill Lynch 1.85
America Online 1.60
General Electric 1.25
Microsoft Corp. 1.00
Coca-Cola 1.00
IBM 1.00
Procter & Gamble 0.85
Energen Corp. 0.80
Heinz 0.70
Empire District Electric 0.45
Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.
6 - 40

Can a beta be negative?

Yes, if ri, m is negative. Then in a


“beta graph” the regression line will
slope downward. Though, a negative
beta is highly unlikely.

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.


6 - 41
_
b = 1.30
ki HT
40

b=0
20
T-Bills

_
-20 0 20 40 kM

Coll.
-20 b = -0.87

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.


6 - 42

Expected Risk
Security Return (Beta)

HT 17.4% 1.30
Market 15.0 1.00
USR 13.8 0.89
T-bills 8.0 0.00
Coll. 1.7 -0.87

Riskier securities have higher returns,


so the rank order is OK.
Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.
6 - 43

Use the SML to calculate the


required returns.

SML: ki = kRF + (kM – kRF)bi .

 Assume kRF = 8%.


^
 Note that kM = kM is 15%. (Equil.)
 RPM = kM – kRF = 15% – 8% = 7%.

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.


6 - 44

Required Rates of Return

kHT = 8.0% + (15.0% – 8.0%)(1.30)


= 8.0% + (7%)(1.30)
= 8.0% + 9.1% = 17.10%.
kM = 8.0% + (7%)(1.00) = 15.00%.
kUSR = 8.0% + (7%)(0.89) = 14.23%.
kT-bill = 8.0% + (7%)(0.00) = 8.00%.
kColl = 8.0% + (7%)(-0.87) = 1.91%.
Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.
6 - 45

Expected vs. Required Returns


^
k k
HT 17.4% 17.1% Undervalued:
^
k>k
Market 15.0 15.0 Fairly valued
USR 13.8 14.2 Overvalued:
^
k<k
T-bills 8.0 8.0 Fairly valued
Coll. 1.7 1.9 Overvalued:
^
k<k
Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.
6 - 46
SML: ki = 8% + (15% – 8%) bi .
ki (%)
SML

HT .
kM = 15 ..
kRF = 8 . T-bills USR
Coll.
. Risk, bi
-1 0 1 2

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.


6 - 47

Calculate beta for a portfolio with 50%


HT and 50% Collections

bp= Weighted average


= 0.5(bHT) + 0.5(bColl)
= 0.5(1.30) + 0.5(-0.87)
= 0.215.

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.


6 - 48

The required return on the HT/Coll.


portfolio is:

kp = Weighted average k
= 0.5(17.1%) + 0.5(1.9%) = 9.5%.

Or use SML:

kp = kRF + (kM – kRF) bp


= 8.0% + (15.0% – 8.0%)(0.215)
= 8.0% + 7%(0.215) = 9.5%. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc.
6 - 49

If investors raise inflation


expectations by 3%, what would
happen to the SML?

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.


6 - 50

Required Rate
of Return ki (%)
 I = 3%
New SML
SML2

18 SML1
15
11 Original situation
8

0 0.5 1.0 1.5 Risk, bi


Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.
6 - 51

If inflation did not change


but risk aversion increased
enough to cause the market
risk premium to increase by
3 percentage points, what
would happen to the SML?

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.


6 - 52
After increase
Required in risk aversion
Rate of
Return (%)
SML2
kM = 18%
2

kM = 15%
1
18 SML1
15  RPM = 3%

8 Original situation
Risk, bi
1.0
Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.
6 - 53

Has the CAPM been verified through


empirical tests?

 Not completely. Those statistical


tests have problems that make
verification almost impossible.

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.


6 - 54

 Investors seem to be concerned


with both market risk and total risk.
Therefore, the SML may not
produce a correct estimate of ki:

ki = kRF + (kM – kRF)bi + ?

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.


6 - 55

 Also, CAPM/SML concepts are


based on expectations, yet betas
are calculated using historical data.
A company’s historical data may
not reflect investors’ expectations
about future riskiness.

Copyright © 2002 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.

You might also like