You are on page 1of 4

Click to edit M a s t e r title style

a
Relia nc e In d u s t ri e s : B u i l d i n g

vi
ed
Execution Excellence in a n

ar
Emerging Market

sh
as
w
S tra teg

m e
c o rc y
o. sou
SM
re
dy

1
This study source was downloaded by 100000829937219 from CourseHero.com on 09-14-2021 11:57:46 GMT
a) What is different here from Alphabet/
Google

• As opposed to the case of Alphabet, Reliance Industries was de-structured into various entities due to dispute
among the Ambani brothers

a
vi
• Reliance growth can be attributed to Dhirubhai Ambani’s strong informal network with the government officials

ed
and bureaucrats
• Reliance ventured into unrelated diversification while Google followed related diversification strategy

ar
sh
• Google was a professionally built organization while Reliance was a family business that grew into a
• conglomerate

as
Google had highly skilled workforce while Mukesh Ambani had a vision to hire young talents and nurture them into

w
• future leadership positions

m e
c o rc
As compared to technology giant Google, Reliance had expertise in incubating blue collar workers and building
massive physical infrastructure
o. sou
re
dy

2
This study source was downloaded by 100000829937219 from CourseHero.com on 09-14-2021 11:57:46 GMT
a) What is different here from Alphabet/
Google

• Reliance ran into multiple issues with the national banks due to allegations of illegal practices while Google had
always maintained a clean image

a
vi
• Reliance had organic growth as they created their own businesses while Google followed an inorganic growth

ed
pattern by acquiring businesses
• Google raised funds through sale of equity while Reliance raised fund through debt financing

ar
sh
as
w
m e
c o rc
o. sou
re
dy

3
This study source was downloaded by 100000829937219 from CourseHero.com on 09-14-2021 11:57:46 GMT
(b) Analyze contradictions from earlier learning & Bring out important learning from the
case
• Allentown lacked a proper leadership structure while Reliance made sure they have a robust leadership fleet built
from the start
• Nokia did not adapt to the changing trends while Reliance always had an eye for innovation and changing practices

a
in the industry

vi
• Honda entered international markets and gained good amount of market share while Reliance beat international

ed
players like the Koreans in their native market
• For Thyrocare time and cost both were equally critical, while for Reliance considered time as the most critical

ar
parameter for their decision making

sh
IMPORTANT LEARNINGS

as
w
• Its imperative to build a strong leadership to manage a gigantic organization like Reliance

m e
Diversification helps companies to have multiple points for profitability and growth
• c o rc
Debt is not always the best way to raise capital in an organization
o. sou
• Time value of money
• Ability to adapt new technology which helped them to become the market leader

re

Investing and keeping faith on youngsters


dy

4
This study source was downloaded by 100000829937219 from CourseHero.com on 09-14-2021 11:57:46 GMT

You might also like