You are on page 1of 8

ASIAN PAINTS CASE

STUDY
GROUP 6:
AINAB ZAIDI - H21003
AKSHAT BHATIA - FH21001
ANANYA KUNDRA - H21007
ASHRAY SHARMA - H21012
FARHEEN NEYAZ - H21017
INTRODUCTION
Asian Paints, Had 24 plants and was
headquartered in Mumbai, operating in 17
founded in 1942 countries by 2012

Fourth-largest decorative Expansion supported by


paints manufacturer in the overall growth of the
world paint industry in India

Market leader in Indian


Set up its first overseas paint industry, twice in size
plant in Fiji in 1978, went than any other paint
public in 1982 company, 25% market
share

Company’s exponential Strong Customer Base | Sturdy distribution network


growth due to: Unique products | Innovative Marketing Techniques
EMPLOYEE PROBLEMS

70% 60% 50%

Employee Engagement
Non- Involvement Rewards & Recognition
- Very little understanding, managers - Although the organization had budgets, - Poor team coordination , lack of
fail to connect with employees, No activities like outing or team proper action plan leaving employees
especially on emotional level. gathering for spirit development. dissatisfied.
- Discussions revolved around work - Asian paints being a reputable - Frequent change in leaders and team
only, thus couldn’t develop any company, employees expected better members - ineffective and
cohesion or communication relating to resources but felt there were No great unmeaningful analysis for employees,
non work. bonuses. thus ESS failed.
- Attitude of “ Chalta hai ‘ in dealing - Presence of bell curve , leaving - AI was implemented. The data was in
with salespeople. employees in rewarding depth- senior managers can’t interpret
- No exit interviews, and no efforts to it
retain employees.
EMPLOYER CHALLENGES
COHESIVENESS
Fatigue and frustration amongst senior managers who
were constantly tackling the problem of lack of knowledge
leading to lack of cohesiveness in their teams.
ATTITUDE
Passive attitude of employees in terms of customer and
TEAMS dealer relationships, leading to complaints from them.
Dynamic teams, high employee turnover, team leaders
changing frequently, analysis of ESS became redundant.

COMPETITION
Increasing competition from all directions, sales function
IMPROVING had become complex and demanding.

Lack of initiative by employees at junior levels to improve


their skills and push their boundaries, low understanding
of the product.
POACHING
Effective training provided by Asian Paints and then
STRUCTURE employees being poached by competitors, leading to high
attrition.
Lack of hierarchical structure, lack of clarity in terms of
career trajectory.
Aon Hewitt Employee Engagement Framework

This framework addresses the hard, tangible factors – basically the hygiene factors first and then
moves towards bonding with the employees by fulfilling the soft, felt experienced Growth and
Fulfillment factors.
GUIDE: APPRECIATE: SUPPORT: LEAD:
To enhance awareness To appreciate and encourage To ensure essential workplace Developing and
about policies. employees. requirements are met. Nurturing leadership.

ALIGN: CONNECT: TOGETHERNESS: GROW:


To align the new joinees To provide opportunity for free To instil fun in workplace and to To focus on building functional
with the organization. expression and facilitate strengthen relationship with expertise and capabilities
communication with employees. employees and their families. among employees.
Leadership Competency Framework

The idea of a leadership


competency framework (LCF) is
to provide a common vocabulary
for all people decisions and
processes towards enabling
sharper managerial judgments. It
has to be simple such that
employees across levels and
functions could relate to it.
THANK
YOU!

Group 6
AINAB ZAIDI - H21003
AKSHAT BHATIA - FH21001
ANANYA KUNDRA - H21007
ASHRAY SHARMA - H21012
FARHEEN NEYAZ - H21017

You might also like