Professional Documents
Culture Documents
• Name: Tamilarasi
• Age: 57y
• Gender: Female
• Address: Villupuram –TN
• Marital status: Married
• Occupation: Daily wage worker
• Socio economic status: Lower middle class
CHIEF COMPLAINTS
ALLERGIC HISTORY
• No known allergens
GENERAL EXAMINATION
• Conscious and co-operative
• ECOG - 1
• Well oriented to time, place and person
• Well build and moderately nourished
• Height:150cm Weight:48 Kg BMI:19.72
• Mild Pallor present
• No Icterus
• No Cyanosis
• No Clubbing
• No Generalized lymphadenopathy
• No Pedal edema
• No feeding tubes or output tubes
• VITALS
• BP: 120/80 mmHg
• Pulse: 94/min, regular rhythm and character
• RR: 18/min
• SpO2: 99% on RA
• Temperature: Afebrile
• RESPIRATORY SYSTEM :
• B/L Normal vesicular breath sounds
• No added sounds
• CVS:
• S1 S2 Normal
• No murmurs audible
• CNS:
• No focal neurological deficit
• Per Abdomen:
• Soft
• No visible masses
• Mild tenderness over the hypogastrium
• Normal Bowel sounds
• No palpable masses
• No dilated veins
• No shifting dullness
Local Examination
•On inspection of the external genitalia
•Mons pubis, clitoris, urethral meatus, fourchette, vulva and anal verge appear normal.
•No visible lesion or warts on the vulva / peri anal area
•No fullness in the groin
•No genital Prolapse
•Serosanguinous discharge present
•P/S Examination
•Proliferative growth replacing the cervix with bleeding spots seen.
•Fornices are full
•Vaginal walls are free. Blood mixed discharge seen over the wall
•P/V Examination
•Proliferative growth replacing both cervical lips.
•All fornices are involved
•Vaginal walls are free
•Uterus is retroverted and bulky
•
• P/V/R examination:
• Right parametria free
• Left parametrium –lesion extending upto lateral pelvic wall.
• Rectal mucosa is free
• Recto vaginal septum is free
SUMMARY
• 57Y old post menopausal female with no known comorbidities presented
with complaints of lower abdominal pian and bleeding P/V of 5 months
duration. On examination patient had a bulky uterus with lesion extending
to left lateral pelvic wall.
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS
• Pelvic inflammatory disease
• Endometrial Tuberculosis
• Endometrial polyps
• Uterine fibroids
• Uterine adenomyosis
• Endometrial Carcinoma
• Endometrial hyperplasia
• Cervical carcinoma
• Endometrial leiomyosarcoma
• Endometrial lymphoma
INVESTIGATIONS
1. Routine Blood investigation; • Indications for further metastatic workup – with
• Complete Hemogram CECT TAP or PET CT:
• RFT with serum electrolytes • Abnormal physical examination findings
• LFT • Bulky uterine tumor
• Serology • Vaginal or extra uterine involvement
2. Pelvic or transvaginal sonography • Delay in presentation or treatment
• Abdominal / pulmonary symptoms
3. Chest X Ray
4. Pelvic MRI
• Origin of tumor (Endocervical vs Endometrial) 5. Endometrial Biopsy:
• Local extend of the disease • Office endometrial biopsy
• Planning for surgery • endometrial curettage (D&C)
• hysterectomy specimen
• Indication for CECT TAP?
• High grade carcinoma – to r/o mets 6. Serum CA 125 –
• If clinically indicated to r/o mets • Recommended in non endometroid histology
• If Carcinoma incidentally detected post surgery • useful for predicting extrauterine disease
• Incompletly staged CA with risk factors • monitoring clinical response.
MRI:
• Uterus appears bulky, with a T1 hypointense and T2 hyperintense lesion noted involving the endometrial
cavity, and cervix, measuring ~ 4.9 x 4.3 x 7.3 cm.
• The lesion is involving more than half to entire thickness of the myometrium at places.
• Inferiorly, the lesion is extending into the entire cervix and extending into the posterior fornix from the left
lateral aspect.
• Multiple areas of serosal breach is seen - left adnexal region apparently involving the left ovary, right
parametrium etc. Mild free fluid is also seen anteriorly. Sigmoid colon is very closely abut in the posterior
aspect of the lesion.
• No obvious involvement of rest of vagina.
• No extension into the pelvic side wall.
• Multiple rounded T2 hyperintense right common, bilateral external iliac, obturator and inguinal lymph
nodes noted, few showing perinodal stranding and irregular margin - maximum SAD ~ 1.3 cm in right
external iliac level - likely involved.
Treatment Paradigm
• If disease limited to the uterus:
• Principles of Surgery:
• TAH+ BSO and lymph node assessment is the primary treatment for uterine confined
endometrial carcinoma
• It should be removed en bloc to optimize outcome
• Surgery can be performed via any route (laparoscopic, robotic, vaginal or abdominal).
Standard recommendation is to chose minimally invasive approach.
• Lymph nodes to be assessed includes – Pelvic(External iliac, internal iliac, common
iliac and obturator nodes) and para aortic
• Para aortic evaluation is important especially in high gade morphologies, histologies
other than endometroid and deeply invasive lesions.
• Surgery should also include visual examination of peritoneal, diaphragmatic and
serosal surfaces with biopsy from suspicious lesions.
• Omental biopsy is recommended in non endometroid histologies
FIGO STAGING FOR ENDOMETRIAL
CARCINOMA
Adjuvant treatment following Surgical staging is based on the risk of
disease recurrence, which in turn depends on
• Stage
• Histology
• Pathological grade
• Depth of myometrial invasion
• LVSI status
• Tumor size
• Patients age
• Lower uterine segment involvement
Risk stratification in Endometrial Carcinoma (ESMO/ESTRO/ESGO)
LOW RISK ENDOMETRIAL CA
• Risk of nodal involvement is <5%
• Vaginal Brachy may reduce the risk of local recurrence without any improvement in OS.
• Pelvic RT in low risk is associated with increased risk of death and treatment related
toxicities.
Low Risk
INTERMEDIATE RISK ENDOMETRIAL CA
• Pelvic RT is recommended
• Decreased LRR from 14% to 4% without improvement in OS
• Significantly increased the risk of toxicities
Intermediate Risk
HIGH INTERMEDIATE RISK ENDOMETRIAL CA
This subset was formed according to PORTEC ! and GOG 99 trial results
• Most suitable treatment Adjuvant Pelvic RT to decreased LRR
HIGH RISK ENDOMETRIAL CA
• Have increased risk of pelvic recurrence and distant mets.
• Adjuvant treatment even though recommended OS is unclear
• IIIC disease definitely have improved OS after Adjuvant RT