Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Created by:
Pristina Dewikhan (T20196100)
Ulil Izzah (201101060010)
Imelda Eva Diarsya (201101060015)
Zaenal Abidin (201101060025)
Aditya Ghimnastiar (202101060010)
Suhaimah (201101060023)
Oral Communication Skills in Pedadogicial Research
1. Conversational Discourse
Richards (1990: 67) noted, "the conversation class is something of an enigma in language teaching." The goals and the
techniques for teaching conversa tion are extremely diverse, depending on the student, teacher, and overall context of the
class
2. Teaching pronunciation
There has been some controversy over the role of pronunciation work in a communicative, interactive course of study.
3. Accuracy and fluency
fluency and accuracy are both important goals to pursue in CLT. While fluency may in many communicative language
courses be an initial goal in language teaching, accuracy is achieved to some extent by allowing students to focus on the
elements of phonology, grammar, and discourse in their spoken output.
4. Affective factors One of the major obstacles learners have to overcome in learning to speak is the anxiety generated
over the risks of blurting things out that are wrong, stupid, or incomprehensible.
5. The interaction effect
The greatest difficulty that learners encounter in attempts to speak is not the multiplicity of sounds, words, phrases, and
discourse forms that characterize any lan guage, but rather the interactive nature of most communication..
2
Types of Spoken Language
Imitative Intensive
Responsive Transactional
TYPES OF CLASSROOM SPEAKING PERFORMANCE
Interpersonal 05
and
Extensive 06
Principles for Designing Speaking Techniques
Encourage the
Techniques should cover the
development of
spectrum of learner needs 01 06
speaking strategies.
Give students
Techniques should be 02 05 opportunities to initiate
intrinsically motivating. oral communication.
10
How to Imply?
13
Intonation-Listening for Pitch Changes
A MODEL FOR CORRECTION OF SPEECH ERRORS
One of the keys, but not the only key, to successful second language learning lies in the
feedback that a learner receives from others. Chapter 8 of PLLT described Vigil and Oller's
model of how affective and cognitive feedback affects the message-sending process. The
traffic signal of cognitive feedback is the point at which error correction enters. A green light
here symbol izes noncorrective feedback that says «I understand your message.» A red light
sym bolizes corrective feedback that takes on a myriad of possiblc forms and causes the
learner to make some kind of alteration in production.
A MODEL FOR CORRECTION OF SPEECH ERRORS
In order to make the decision the teacher may have recourse to factors with imme
diate, temporary bearing, such as the importance of the error to the current
pedagogical focus on the lesson, the teacher's perception of the chance of eliciting
correct performance from the student if nega tive feedback is given, and so on. In a
very practical article on error treatment, James Hendrickson advised teachers to try
to discern the difference between global and local errors, . « Once a learner of
English was describing a quaint old hotel in Europe and said, »There is a French
widdrw in every bedroom The local error is clearly, and
humorously, recognized. «The different city is another one in the another two» Is a
sentence that would certainly need treatment because it is incomprehensible as is.
Many utterances are not clearly global or local, and it is difficult to discern the necessity for
corrective feedback. A leamer once wrote, «The grammar is the basement of every language»
While this witty little proclamation may indeed sound more like Chomsky than Chomsky docs, it
behooves the teacher to ascertain just what the learner meant here , and to provide some feedback
to clarify the difference between the two. The bottom line is that we simply must not stifle our
students' attempts at production by smothering them with corrective feedback.
Those are from us and see u !!