Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Revsine/Collins/Johnson/Mittelstaedt/Soffer: Chapter 10
Copyright © 2018 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution
without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education
Learning Objectives
After studying this chapter, you will understand:
The principal issues in accounting for property, plant and equipment are the
recognition of the assets, the determination of their carrying amounts and the
depreciation charges and impairment losses to be recognised in relation to
them.
Cost model
After recognition as an asset, an item of property, plant and equipment shall be
carried at its cost less any accumulated depreciation and any accumulated
impairment losses.
Revaluation model
After recognition as an asset, an item of property, plant and equipment whose
fair value can be measured reliably shall be carried at a revalued amount, being
its fair value at the date of the revaluation less any subsequent accumulated
depreciation and subsequent accumulated impairment losses.
Revaluations shall be made with sufficient regularity to ensure that the carrying
amount does not differ materially from that which would be determined using fair
value at the end of the reporting period
There are two ways that long-lived assets could be measured on balance sheets:
Discounted
present value Historical cost
$$ $$
Net realizable Replacement cost
value
The initial balance sheet carrying amount of a long-lived asset is governed by two
rules:
1. All costs necessary to acquire the asset and make it ready for use are
included in the asset account; that is, they are capitalized costs. (Expenditures
excluded from asset categories are “expensed” to income.)
Capitalized Expensed
$100 Equipment A
$200 delivery
and installation fee
$100 Equipment B
Purchase price
Preparation
costs
Joint cost
Construction
costs
Joint cost
GAAP requires capitalizing what are called avoidable interest payments on self-
constructed assets; this interest is defined as that “could have been avoided . . .
if expenditures for the assets had not been made.”
Avoidable interest = Cumulative weighted average expenditures on the
constructed asset x I interest rate
Canyon’s calculation of avoidable interest:
Construction
expenditures
$715,000 $715,000
Allocation 1: Allocation 2:
Higher Lower
depreciation depreciation
For tax purposes, the incentives for allocating costs between land and building asset
categories are completely different because the objective of most firms is to minimize tax
payments, not to “correctly” allocate costs.
The higher the costs allocated to land for tax purposes, the higher the future taxable
income becomes because land cannot be depreciated.
price.
Most acquired intangible assets are amortized (depreciated) on a straight-line
basis over their expected useful economic lives and reviewed for impairment.
Some intangible assets, known as indefinite-lived intangible assets, have
indefinite lives and are not amortized. Instead, they are evaluated annually
for impairment.
Difficult financial reporting issues exist when the intangible asset is developed
internally instead of being purchased from another company.
These difficulties arise because it is uncertain whether current expenditures will
ultimately lead to valuable patents or trademarks.
Before After
Software project time line
$2,500,000
$2,350,000
$46,000
When individual long-lived assets are disposed of before their useful lives
are completed, any difference between the net book value of the asset and
the disposition proceeds is treated as a gain or loss.
Gain (loss) = Disposition proceeds – Book Value
Gain (loss) = Disposition proceeds – (Cost – Accumulated Depreciation)
The entry to record the disposition removes the asset and its
accumulated deprecation from the books:
The need for unbiased, accurate, cost-effective, and verifiable numbers causes
these assets to be measured in terms of the economic sacrifice incurred to obtain
them—their historical cost—rather than in terms of their current expected benefit—
or economic worth—to the firm.
Because it is uncertain whether future benefits result from research and brand
development costs, these costs are generally expensed in the period incurred.
Consequently, balance sheet carrying amounts for intangible assets often differ
from their real value to the firm. Analysts must scrutinize disclosures of R&D
expenses to undo the overly conservative accounting.
When comparing return on assets (ROA) ratios across firms, one must remember that
historical cost leads to an upward drift in reported ROA as assets age. So, analysts must
determine whether the average age of the long-lived assets for firms being analyzed is stable
or rising. Inflation also injects an upward bias into reported ROA.
Asset impairment write-downs depend on subjective forecasts and could be used to manage
earnings.
An understanding of differences in depreciation choices across firms permits better interfirm
comparisons. When making interfirm comparisons, analysts should use note disclosures to
overcome differences in the long-lived asset useful lives chosen by each firm and, when
possible, in their depreciation patterns.