Professional Documents
Culture Documents
‘Limited’.
it has no restriction on the maximum number of members; right of transferability
of its shares & can make public issue.
Its minimum paid up share capital is rupees 5 lakh.
NOTE: A private company Subsidiary of a public company will also be deemed to
be a public company even if it is a private company
CONVERSION OF PRIVATE COMPANY INTO PUBLIC
COMPANY & VICE VERSA
CONVERSION OF PRIVATE COMPANY INTO PUBLIC COMPANY
A private company can become a public company by passing a special
or an ‘investment company’
OPC cannot be converted into any other type of company within 2 years of its
incorporation.
OPC shall be converted into any other type of company if its Paid up Capital
Must hold at least one Board Meeting in each half calendar year and gap between two
A: PROMOTION OF A COMPANY
Promotion involves the undertaking of all steps which are necessary to bring about a company.
These include, conception of business idea, investigation of feasibility of the idea, assembling
various business elements called ‘4Ms’ namely: Money, Men, Materials, and Management.
Promoter is the person (s) who undertakes all these steps.
Section 2(69) has defined promoter to mean a person who:
has been named in the prospectus or identified by the company in its Annual Return as per
Section 92; or
Has direct or indirect control over company affairs whether as a shareholder, director or
otherwise, or
On whose advice, directions or instructions the Board of the company is accustomed to act.
NOTE: Proviso to Section 2(69) excludes the following from the category of promoters: person
A promoter may avoid or limit his personal liability with regard to pre-
incorporation contracts by undertaking the following:
I. Reserving ‘right of assignment’ of contract in future by an appropriate
clause in the pre-incorporation contract;
II. Making the contract in the capacity of a trustee subject to the condition
that he will stand released on the making of a new contract (novation) by
the company;
III. Making a draft agreement which the company would adopt on
incorporation provided an express provision has been made to that effect
in the objects clause.
All the above are subject to Section 230 of the Contract Act 1872 which
provides that in the absence of contract to the contrary, an agent cannot
enforce the contracts made on behalf of the principal nor is he personally
bound by such contracts.
RATIFICATION OF PRE-INCORPRATION CONTRACTS
UNDER SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT 1963
In terms of Sections 15(h) and 19(e) of Specific Relief Act 1963, a pre-
incorporation contract may be specifically enforced by or against the
company if following conditions are fulfilled:
i. Promoter has made the contract purportedly for the purpose of the
company;
ii. The Contract is warranted by the terms of incorporation i.e., included in
the Articles of Association;
iii. The Company has adopted the contract after incorporation and
communicated its acceptance to the promoter
INCORPORATION/REGISTRATION OF THE COMPANY
As already described, there can be TWO major types of companies namely: Public
Company or Private Company which includes an OPC which has only one subscriber;
Each of these types of companies may be limited by shares or by guarantee or be
unlimited liability companies;
Activities preliminary to incorporation include: ascertaining the availability of the
proposed name by the company; getting the MOA and AOA prepared and printed,
getting these documents subscribed (signed) by requisite number of persons i.e., one,
two or seven depending on the type of the company in the presence of one witness for
each subscriber; DIN of each of the proposed directors, affidavit by each subscriber and
First Directors about there being no conviction on grounds of fraud, misfeasance, or
breach of duty connected with formation, promotion or management of any company;
Address for Communication till company acquires a registered office within 15 days of
incorporation;
Statutory Declaration about compliance with all the requirements of registration signed
by an advocate, practicing chartered or cost accountant / company secretary;
Filing the documents with the Registrar of the relevant State accompanied by the
registration fees based on authorized capital of the proposed company;
ISSUE OF CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION [Section
7(2)] AND ITS LEGAL EFFECTS
After scrutiny of the filed documents, the Registrar shall issue a
‘Certificate of Incorporation’ to the effect that the company has been
incorporated and allot a Corporate Identity Number which is noted on the
Certificate;
The following shall be the legal effects of Certificate of Incorporation:
From the date of incorporation, the subscribers to the MOA shall become
members of the Company;
Company shall become a ‘body corporate’ known by the name contained
in the MOA;
Body corporate can exercise all the functions of an incorporated company
with perpetual succession and power to acquire and dispose of property;
Body Corporate can sue and be sued under the name allotted to it.
CONCLUSIVENESS OF CERTIFICATE OF
INCORPORATION [COI]
COI is conclusive evidence that all legal requirements connected with incorporation
have been fulfilled;
That the company has come into existence from the date mentioned in the certificate;
COI is conclusive though it may be impossible for proper registration of the company
on account of all subscribers to MOA being minors [Rule in Peel’s Case 1867] or if
the company had allotted shares prior to the date of registration [Jubilee Cotton Mills
Ltd v. Lewis 1924 AC 958];
Once the company has been incorporated the only method to extinguish it will be to
resort to winding up’
If COI contains any mistakes, these cannot be rectified and the only recorse will be to
wind up the company
EXCEPTION TO CONCLUSIVENESS OF COI
COI cannot validate objects which are illegal [Bowman v. Secular Society Ltd 1917
AC , HL]
COMMENCEMENT OF BUSINESS
Government approval;
Not to give impression as if it is connected with the government, etc,
Last words in the name of One Person company; Private Company and a Public Company must
respectively be: OPC, Pvt. Ltd, and Limited or its abbreviated form;
Reservation of Name by the Company can be done for a total period of SIX Months after which it shall
former name;
2: Registered Office Clause to specify the State in which it shall be situated, and
Office must be had within 15 days of incorporation, and
Verification of address shall be done by filing the same with Registrarwithin 30 days of
incorporation.
CONTENTS OF MEMORANDUM OF ASSOCIATION-2
3: Objects Clause sets out the vires of the company in two parts namely:
(i) Main Objects [There is no restriction on number of main objects], and
(ii) Other Objects considered necessary for furtherance of main objects.
4: Liability Clause:
It states that liability of its members is limited to the unpaid amount on
their holdings;
In case of a company limited by guarantee, it shall state the amount
which each member has undertaken to contribute towards assets in the
event of winding up
An unlimited company shall state that the liability of its members is
unlimited.
5: Capital Clause in case of company limited by shares shall state the amount
of its capital called ‘authorized capital’, number of shares in which it is
divided and face value of each share.
6: Association Clause declares intention of subscribers to from the company.
DOCTRINE OF ULTRA VIRES
DOCTRINE OF ULTRA VIRES
The word ‘ultra’ means ‘beyond’ and the word ‘vires’ means ‘powers’;
Ultra vires may relate to the acts beyond the scope of the Memorandum or
Articles or powers of the directors;
In the context of Memorandum of Association, ultra vires refers to any
transaction of the company which is beyond the powers of the company i.e.
the objects clause of the company;
Any ultra vires transaction of a company is void but not illegal;
Ultra vires transactions cannot be ratified or validated even by the entire
majority of shareholders;
Object of the doctrine is to protect the interests of the company as well as
the investors and creditors;
Third parties cannot invoke the doctrine to avoid any voluntarily
undertaken obligations with full knowledge of the scope of company’s
powers;
TYPES OF ULTRA VIRES
Ultra vires transaction may be of the following types:
(i) Ultra Vires the Directors i.e., the transactions or acts which are beyond
the powers of the directors as specified in the Act or the Articles;
(ii) Ultra Vires the Articles i.e., the transactions or acts which are beyond
the scope of Articles such as giving a higher interest on calls received in
advance than the rate specified in the Articles;
NOTE: Aforementioned transactions or acts are irregular but not ultra vires
so that the company may ratify those by passing a resolution in the
general meeting.
(iii) Ultra Vires Torts Committed by Employees of the Company: Torts of
employees which are within the scope of their employment are binding on
the company. However, the torts which are outside the scope of their
employment or unauthorized acts of employees, cannot be held binding on
the company.
CASE STUDY ON DOCTRINE OF ULTRA VIRES
CASE: ASHBURY RLY CARRIAGE CO LTD v. RICHE (1875) HL
FACTS:
The Objects Clause of the company’s Memorandum provided that the company
can “make, sell, lend on hire railway carriages and wagons of all kinds …… and to
carry on the business of mechanical engineers and general contractors”.
The directors however contracted to finance the construction of a railway line in
Belgium which was endorsed by the shareholders.
One of the shareholders challenged the directors’ action on the ground of its being
‘ultra vires.’
ISSUE: Is the impugned transaction ultra vires the memorandum?
JUDGMENT: the court held the act to be ultra vires since the word ‘general
contractors cannot be interpreted to authorize the company to undertake contract of
every description.
CASE STUDY ON DOCTRINE OF ULTRA VIRES-
2
LASHMANASWAMI MUDALIAR v. LIC OF INDIA 1963 SC
FACTS: The company donated rupees 2 lakh from shareholders’ account to a Trust
formed for promoting technical or business education including knowledge in
insurance. There was no obligation on the trustees to use the funds for promoting
insurance education nor was there any assurance that the concerned persons will
take up employment with the insurance company.
ISSUE: Is the donation within the purview of Objects Clause of the Memorandum?
JUDGMENT:
Held that the company can donate the funds only for the purpose of promoting
objects of the company and not otherwise;
Donation of funds to the trust was therefore ultra vires the objects Clause;
Trustees are liable to repay the money obtained from the company.
LEGAL EFFECTS OF ULTRA VIRES
1. Null & Void:
Ultra vires transactions are null and void and unenforceable by the company as
also the other party.
2. Injunction
A shareholder of the company can seek injunction to prevent the company from
proceeding with an ultra vires act or transactions [Trevor v. Whitworth 1887].
3. Personal Liability of Directors for pursuing ultra vires on the ground of
breach of warranty of authority [Weeks v. Propert (1873)].
4. No Ratification of ultra vires transaction even by the whole majority of
shareholders though it may adopted by amending the ‘objects clause’.
5. No right to sue or of being sued on ultra vires contracts.
6. Right of the Parties to seek restitution of money or property involved in
ultra vires transaction.
7. Company’s Right on ultra vires acquired property or lending is protected.
ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION
CONCEPT OF ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION
Articles constitute the second most important mandatory document of a company
and ranks after the Memorandum;
Articles contain the rules and regulations for internal management of a company;
Facilitates the carrying out of Objects set out in the Memorandum;
Alterable by the general meeting by passing special resolution;
Their function is to define the rights and duties of the shareholders and those of
the Governing Board;
These establish a contractual relation between the Company and the members as
well as the members inter se;
Any provision in the Articles inconsistent with the memorandum or in conflict
with the Act shall be invalid;
In V.B.Rangaraj v. V.B. Gopalkrishnan (1992) SC, the court held void the right of
directors to reject transfer of shares if these were not in a lot of less than fifty
shares on the ground of violation of Section 22A of the Securities Contract
Regulations Act 1956;
ENTRENCHMENT PROVISIONS IN ARTICLES
These provisions the Articles may be altered by following conditions or
procedures that are more restrictive than those applicable to passing of a
special resolution e. g., giving some special right such as the right to veto a
Board decision may be given to the promoters;
Entrenchment provision can be included in the Articles either at the time of
formation of the company or by means of amendment in the Articles;
Amendment for including entrenchment provision in Articles will require
(i) a special resolution in case of a public company, and (ii) unanimous
approval of all members in case of a private company;
Notice of entrenchment provisions must be given to the Registrar within
30 days of their making
RELATION BETWEEN MEMORANDUM &
ARTICLES
Memorandum contains fundamental conditions based upon which a company
may be incorporated whereas the Articles define the rules of internal
management of affairs of the company while remaining within the boundaries set
by memorandum;
Articles cannot exceed the powers of the company as laid down in the
memorandum else those will be held void and incapable of ratification;
Memorandum is the supreme document just like constitution of the company
and lays the boundaries beyond which actions of the company cannot go so that the
Articles can frame rules within the boundaries circumscribed by the memorandum;
Articles may be used to explain any ambiguity in the memorandum but these
cannot modify or extend the provisions of the memorandum;
Any act of the company beyond the memorandum is ultra vires whereas the one
beyond Articles is merely irregular and therefore capable of ratification by the
general meeting
LEGAL EFFECT OF MEMORANDUM & ARTICLES
On registration, the Memorandum and Articles bind the company and its members as if
each clause has been signed by the company and each member separately;
Bind Members to the Company such as in Borland Trustees v. Steel Bros Co Ltd
(1901), where sale by of shares of a member on his bankruptcy by trustees of a bankrupt
member without compliance with the provision of Articles was not allowed;
Bind Company to the Members so that a member may restrain the company from
breaching his membership rights such as an attempt by the Board to pay dividend in the
form of debentures [Wood v. Odessa Waterworks Co (1889)];
Bind Members inter se though there is no express contract between members and
hence a member cannot sue another for any wrongs or for enforcement of any rights that
the company may have against a member. Company alone can initiate action but a
member may join hands with the company in pursuing the remedy;
Not binding on Company or Members in relation to Outsiders so that an outsider
cannot bring any action based on these documents being an outsider [Eley v. Positive
Security life Association Co Ltd (1876) such as where a person appointed for life as per
the Articles failed to base action on Articles when he was removed earlier. But
But an outsider can sue where terms of the contract with him were based on the Articles
[Swabey v. Port Darwin Mining Co (1889)].
DOCTRINE OF CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE OF
MEMORANDUM & ARTICLES [section 399]
On registration of Company, the Memorandum and Articles become public
documents and are open to public inspection in the Registrar’s Office on payment of
prescribed fee;
Company shall supply a member with a copy of these documents within 7 days of
request by him else the defaulting officer will be liable to pay the prescribed penalty;
Every person dealing with the company is assumed to know the contents of these
documents so that if any of his act is inconsistent with the rules contained in these
documents, he cannot acquire any rights against the company;
No outsider dealing with the company can take the plea that he was not aware of the
contents of these documents irrespective whether or not he has read them;
It is a negative doctrine so that it cannot operate against the company but operates
only against the outside parties dealing with the company.
In Rajendra Nath Dutta v. Shibendra Nath Mukerjee (1982), the Articles provided
for the signing of every document by the MD, Secretary and ED on behalf of the
company but a mortgage deed was not signed by the MD. Held the mortgagee
cannot enforce the mortgage against the company.
DOCTRINE OF INDOOR
MANAGEMENT
DOCTRINE OF INDOOR MANAGEMENT [TURQUAND’S
RULE”
Turquand’s Rule is an exception to the Rule of Constructive Notice;
It states that every person dealing with the company may presume that internal
formalities prescribed in the public documents must have been followed by the
company;
In Royal British Bank v. Turquand (1856), the directors of the bank issued a bond
to the defendant without authority of a resolution which was requisite in terms of
Articles and the Bank refused to honour the bond on ground of non complaince with
the Articles. Held, that the bank is bound as Turquand could assume that the
necessary resolution must have been passed.
Rule is based on reasons of public convenience else a company to refuse to abide by
its commitment on ground of its failure to follow a rule contained in the Articles;
An outsider must know the documents but he need not probe whatever may have
happened indoors which are closed to him;
Rule has great practical significance without which companies would have escaped
liability by pleading lack of authority on the part of concerned officials.
EXCEPTIONS TO DOCTRINE OF INDOOR
MANAGEMENT
Actual or constructive knowledge of irregularity by the plaintiff such as
possession of information about the names of authorized signatories of the company
will be bar to invocation of doctrine as was the case in National Coal Co Ltd v. Gyan
Ranjan Bhatacharya AIR 1927 Cal; or lending by directors despite knowledge that
borrowing beyond one thousand pounds will need general body resolution but they
lent beyond that amount without such resolution. Held they cannot recover beyond
1000 pounds.
Suspicion of Irregularity (Negligence) but not making any inquiry by the
concerned person will disqualify him from invoking the doctrine e.g., acceptance of
transfer of company property from an accountant of the Company [Anand Bihari Lal
v. Dinshaw & Co Ltd (1942].
Reliance upon a Forged Document will not attract the doctrine [Ruben v. Great
Fingall Consoldated 1906].
No Knowledge of Articles on a person’s part will disqualify from pleading the
principle of estoppel [Rama Corporation v. Proved Tin & General Investment Co
1952 in which a person took a cheque from a company director without any
delegation of such authority in favour of that director’ as specified in the Articles].
EXCEPTIONS TO DOCTRINE OF INDOOR
MANAGEMENT
An act beyond the Scope of Apparent Authority of the concerned
Company Official (s) will not bind the company as in Freeman v.
Backhurst Park Properties1964 where agreement was signed by only
one director instead of four as provided in the Articles.
COMPANY MEETINGS
CONCEPT OF MEETING
Special Business
Ordinary Business:
Under Section 102 (2)(a), the following ordinary business may be
members of the company may call an EGM in the same manner, as nearly as possible, in
which such a meeting is called by the Board [Section 100(1) & Article 43 of Table F];
The power given to the Board in Section 100(1) is discretionary in nature.
less than 1/10th of the paid up share capital and having a right to vote at the meeting in
respect of that matter;
In case of a company not having share capital, on the requisition of members holding 1/10th
of the total voting power and having the right to vote on the said date;
The requisition deposited in the registered office 21 days before the meeting shall set out the
company.
WHO MAY CALL EGM? -2
3: By the Requisitionists
On failure of the Board to convene the meeting within 45 days of receipt of
requisition, the requisitionists may themselves proceed to call the meeting within 3
months from the date of deposit of requisition.
It has been held in LIC of India v. Escorts Ltd. AIR 1986 SC 1370 that every
shareholder has the right to requisition an EGM and he cannot be restrained by an
injunction from calling the meeting nor is he bound to disclose the reasons.
The reasons for calling the EGM by the members are not subject to judicial review.
The meeting shall be called in the same manner as meetings are called by the Board.
If the registered office is not made available for holding the meeting, it may be held
elsewhere.
Requisitionists may claim from the company, the reasonable expenses incurred by
them in calling the meeting.
The sums so paid may be deducted by the company out of the fees or other
remuneration payable under section 197 to such of directors who were in default.
WHO MAY CALL EGM? - 3
4: BY THE TRIBUNAL
If for any reason, it is impracticable to call, hold or conduct an extraordinary general
meeting, the Tribunal may, either of its own motion, or on the application of any
director or member of the company who would be entitled to vote at the meeting, order
a meeting to be called, held and conducted in the manner as directed by the Tribunal.
For instance, if a meeting already convened by the company has become disorderly or
including a direction that one member present in person or proxy shall be deemed to
constitute a meeting.
A meeting held in pursuance of the Tribunal’s orders shall be considered to be a
‘Minutes’ are the written record of the proceedings, business transacted and
the decisions taken at company meetings;
Section 118 requires every company to prepare, sign, and keep minutes of all
the proceedings of every type of meeting;
Minutes are to be recorded in the “Minutes Book” the pages whereof have
been consecutively numbered and each page initialed by the Chair;
Entries in the minutes book shall be made within 30 days of conclusion of
the meeting;
Last page of the recording of the meeting proceedings shall be signed by the
Chair of the meeting, or by Chair of Board or Board Committee in case of
Board or a Board Committee meeting;
Minutes shall contain fair summary of proceedings and it shall be kept at the
registered office for inspection by members for 2 hours daily during business
hours.
DIRECTORS AND BOARD
DIRECTORS OF A COMPANY: NEED
Being an artificial person, a company does not have any of the physical
organs like ears, eyes, mind or hands, etc;
For its proper functioning, it has to take the help of a human agency called
the ‘directors;
Next to general body of shareholders who are purveyors of capital, the
directors are the persons skilled in governance of the company;
Directors are the brains and hands of the company and work together as a
‘Board’ to take various decision affecting various management functions;
Legally, the shareholders are the ‘owners’ of the company whereas the
directors are their ‘agents’ working for a remuneration;
Directors are elected representatives of the shareholders exercising their
powers in accordance with the provisions contained in the Act.
CONCEPT OF DIRECTOR
Section 149 has made it mandatory for every company in India to have a Board of directors which
shall comprise a minimum of 2 directors in case of a private company and minimum 3 directors in
the case of a public company but only ONE director is required by a One Person Company;
Maximum number of directors can be 15 though a higher number may be appointed by passing a
special resolution as per Proviso to Section 149;
Despite the pivotal position occupied by the directors, the term has not been defined with the
degree of required precision;
Under Section 2(13), a director means “a director appointed to the Board of a Company”.
It implies that a person can become a director only if he has been appointed to the Board of a
company so that no person can occupy this position without any formal appointment to the Board;
For proper understanding of the concept, it is imperative to look into a director in relation to a
foreign company;
Under Section 386 (b), a director is one ‘with whose directions or instructions the Board of
Directors of a company is accustomed to acting’;
Accordingly, it is possible for a person to be a director without being a member of the Board such
as is the case with ‘shadow director’ who will fall within the mischief of Section 185(1) (e).
WHO MAY BE APPOINTED A DIRECTOR?
Every company shall appoint only individuals as directors so that a body corporate,
association of persons or a firm cannot be appointed as a director;
Reason behind appointment of individual is that the office of a director is an “office of
trust” and hence there must be a person who can be held liable for his actions beyond an
iota of doubt;
Law has not prescribed any qualifications for being appointed a director except that he
must be competent to contract;
Disqualifications for Appointment of director include;
Conviction on ground of moral turpitude and minimum imprisonment for 6 months and
period of six months must not have elapsed since serving of the sentence;
Person disqualified by a Court /Tribunal;
Person not having paid calls on his shares for six moths from due date;
Person convicted for ‘related party transactions’ in the past five years;
Director of a company which has not (i) filed financial statements and annual returns for
last three FYs; (ii) repaid deposits or interest thereon or paid dividend or debentures that
have become redeemable for one year or more.
MANDATORY APPOINTMENT OF CERTAIN
CATEGORIES OF DIRECTORS
MANDATORY CATEGORY OF DIRECTORS
A member of the company other than retiring director may give 14 days’
notice to company with One lakh rupees of security deposit proposing his
candidature as director,
On getting elected or securing 25% of the total valid votes, the security
deposit is refunded or otherwise forfeited
APPOINTMENT OF DIRECTORS BY
BOARD
APPOINTMENT OF DIRECTORS BY BOARD
Additional Directors:
Board can appoint additional directors only if so authorized by the
Articles but the person who lost election at general meeting cannot be so
appointed by the Board;
Casual Vacancy if so authorized by Articles in the case of a Public
Company arising from resignation, death, disqualification other than
retirement;
Alternate Director if so authorized by Articles if original director is
absent from India for a minimum period of 3 Months and such person shall
vacate office when original director returns to India.
APPOINTMENT OF SMALL SHAREHOLDERS’
DIRECTOR
Such director can be appointed only in case of listed companies;
Small shareholder means a shareholder holding shares of nominal value of
not more than Rs, 20,000;
Company may appoint such director suo motu or on receipt of notice from
not less than 1000 shareholders or 1/10th of the total number of small
shareholders whichever number is less;
14 days notice along with consent of the candidate with his DIN and a
declaration that he is not disqualified from directorship shall be submitted in
the company’s registered office;
Tenure of such director is 3 years and he cannot become small shareholders’
director in more than one another company and that other company must not
be in business competing with that of the first;
He shall not be eligible for reappointment as Small Shareholders Director
after demitting office as such director.
TOTAL NUMBER OF DIRECTORSHIPS
PER INDIVIDUAL
RESTRICTIONS ON TOTAL DIRECTORSHIPS
Audit Committee;
II. all public companies having turnover of 100 crore rupees or more,
by the Board;
Chairperson of the committees or, in his absence,