Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Human Error
Human Error
Human Error
Human error has been cited as a primary cause or
contributing factor in disasters and accidents. Human
error means that something has been done that was "not
intended by the character; not desired by a set of rules or
an external observer; or that led the task or system
outside its acceptable limits".
STCW Table A-II/1
Human Error
STCW Table A-II/1
Human Error
In order to understand the basis for adverse events and develop
effective strategies for reducing risk it is necessary to appreciate
the role human error often plays as the cause of harmful
incidents.
An appreciation of the major types of errors and the omnipresent
"error chain" will help make your root cause analyses more
focused and effective.
STCW Table A-II/1
Human Error
Types of Error
Errors can be divided into three categories:
conditions
STCW Table A-II/1
Human Error
Person approach
The longstanding and widespread tradition of the person
approach focuses on the unsafe acts errors and procedural
violations.
It views these unsafe acts as arising primarily from aberrant
mental processes such as forgetfulness, inattention, poor
motivation, carelessness, negligence, and recklessness.
STCW Table A-II/1
Human Error
Person approach
Naturally enough, the associated countermeasures are directed
mainly at reducing unwanted variability in human behaviour.
These methods include poster campaigns that appeal to people's
sense of fear, writing another procedure (or adding to existing
ones), disciplinary measures, threat of litigation, retraining,
naming, blaming, and shaming
STCW Table A-II/1
Human Error
System approach
The basic premise in the system approach is that humans are
fallible and errors are to be expected, even in the best
organizations. ( capable of doing mistakes )
Errors are seen as consequences (kinahinatnan) rather than
causes, having their origins not so much in the perversity (hindi
masama ) of human nature as in “upstream” systemic factors.
STCW Table A-II/1
Human Error
System approach
Human Error
System approach
There are two major types of error that need to be
considered when conducting a root cause analysis. The
holes in the defenses arise for two reasons
a) active failures
b) latent conditions
STCW Table A-II/1
Human Error
System approach
Active Failures: errors that are committed by a person,
usually front-line direct support personnel. These types of
error are the most "noticeable" and are usually associated
with the proximate cause (malapit na dahilan ) of an adverse
event, i.e., they take place immediately before the incident.
STCW Table A-II/1
Human Error
There are three major types of active failures:
• Slips - unintended deviations from an established procedure, often due to
distraction or inadequate attention to the task at hand.
• Mistakes - these are due to faulty reasoning and poor judgment. They are
not intentional and are often associated with a novel or new situation.
• Unsafe Practices - errors associated with an intentional or conscious
decision to do something "risky." Unsafe practices are direct violations of
rules and/or standards.
STCW Table A-II/1
Human Error
Latent conditions: errors in system design that set the stage for and
Human Error
Latent conditions
• Set the stage for failure - They set the stage for later errors
by staff and are often associated with confusing policy and
procedure, inadequate training, scheduling multiple
activities at the same time, punitive (maparusahan) work
environments that lead to stress and fear of failure,
inappropriate staff scheduling, unrealistic expectations, etc.
STCW Table A-II/1
Human Error
Error of Commission - mistake that consists of doing
something wrong, such as including a wrong amount, or
including an amount in the wrong place.
Error of Omission - mistake that consists of not doing
something you should have done, or not including something
such as an amount or fact that should be included.
STCW Table A-II/1
Situational Awareness
Situational Awareness is the ability to identify,
process, and comprehend the critical elements
of information about what is happening to the
team with regards to the mission. More simply,
it’s knowing what is going on around you.
STCW Table A-II/1
Situational Awareness
Example:
A fire broke out at night while the crew are
resting. They were called to their stations
and was able to combat the fire and
extinguish it within an hour. They know
what they are doing and kept in mind what
they learned.
STCW Table A-II/1
Situational Awareness
The loss of Situational Awareness usually occurs over a period of
time and will leave a trail of clues. Be alert for the following clues
that will warn of lost or diminished Situational Awareness:
• Confusion or gut feeling ( ex, sweaty palm )
• No one watching or looking for hazards
• Use of improper procedures
STCW Table A-II/1
Situational Awareness
• Departure from regulations
• Failure to meet planned targets
• Unresolved discrepancies
• Ambiguity (kalabuan)
• Fixation or preoccupation (natulala o napako)
STCW Table A-II/1
Week 6
Situational Awareness
Confusion
Disorder within the team or a gut feeling that things are not right. This clue is
one of the most reliable because the body is able to detect stimulus long
before we have consciously put it all together. Trust your feelings!
Ambiguity ( kalabuan )
When information we need is confusing or unclear, we must clarify or to fill in
the missing pieces before proceeding.
STCW Table A-II/1
Situational Awareness
No one Watching or Looking for Hazards
Vessel operations require more than just
driving the bow of the cutter or boat. The
proper assignment and performance of
tasks, particularly supervisory and lookout
ones, is essential to safe vessel operations.
STCW Table A-II/1
Situational Awareness
Use of Improper Procedures
This puts the individual or team in a gray area where no one
may be able to predict outcomes with any certainty.
Departure from Regulations
In addition to violating procedures, we are operating in an
unknown area where the consequences of our actions cannot
be predicted with any degree of certainty.
STCW Table A-II/1
Situational Awareness
Failure to Meet Planned Targets
Unresolved Discrepancies
Situational Awareness
Fixation or Preoccupation
When someone fixates on one task or becomes
preoccupied with work or personal matters, they
lose the ability to detect other important
information. Early detection of both fixation and
preoccupation is essential to safe vessel
operations.
STCW Table A-II/1
and splash himself with water. His actions worsen the effect of
Situational Awareness
Maintenance of situational awareness occurs through
effective communications and a combination of the following
actions.
• Recognize and make others aware when the team deviates
from standard procedures.
• Monitor the performance of other team members.
• Provide information in advance.
STCW Table A-II/1
Situational Awareness
• Identify potential or existing problems (i.e. equipment-related or
operational).
• Demonstrate awareness of task performance.
• Communicate a course of action to follow as needed.
• Demonstrate ongoing awareness of mission status.
• Continually assess and reassess the situation in relation to the mission
goal(s).
• Clarifying expectations of all team members eliminates doubt.
STCW Table A-II/1
Situational Awareness
Barriers to Situational Awareness
Situational Awareness
Barriers to Situational Awareness
• Complacency. ( kasiyahan )
• Overload.
• Fatigue.
• Poor communications.
• Boredom
STCW Table A-II/1
Situational Awareness
Perception ( pang-unawa )
Situational Awareness
Excessive Motivation
This behavior imposes expectations and filters that
affect our ability to fully assess the situation and
any safety risks. It includes, but is not limited to an
overriding sense of mission importance.
STCW Table A-II/1
Situational Awareness
Fatigue
Fatigue affects vigilance. Adjusting work routine
and imposing sleep discipline to prevent wake
cycles longer than 18 hours and permit at least
5 and preferably 8 hours/day of sound sleep can
minimize sleep deprivation.
STCW Table A-II/1
Situational Awareness
Complacency ( Kasiyahan )
Assuming everything is under control affects vigilance. When
things are slow, tasks are routine, and/or when the vessel’s
employment objectives have been achieved, complacency can
occur.
Challenging yourself and/or the team to be prepared for
contingencies (e.g. planning or training) can deter complacency.
STCW Table A-II/1
Situational Awareness
Overload
Overload causes distraction; fixation;
increased errors, and high stress.
Prioritizing and delegating tasks and
minimizing job distractions can improve
safety in conditions of overload.
STCW Table A-II/1
Situational Awareness
Poor Communications
The level of situational awareness achieved is related to the level and
quality of communications observed in the team.
Boredom
Boredom can be a trap to situational awareness. We can miss what’s
going on in this cases. That’s why good habits are a real life-saver.
Professional diligence ( sipag ) and discipline helps you to stay aware
even when you’re bored.
STCW Table A-II/1
Situational Awareness
Automation or automatic control, is the use
of various control systems for operating
equipment. Too much reliance on equipment
leads to complacency for you put your trust
to it and put your critical thinking and
judgment to rest. This is when boredom
strikes increasing the risk of accidents.