VERSUS NO ANTICOAGULATION FOR POST-DISCHARGE THROMBOPROPHYLAXIS AFTER HOSPITALISATION FOR COVID-19
Presenter: Dr. Vikas Kumar Mall
INTRODUCTION More thrombotic events in Covid 19 than ARDS associated with other diseases. Cytokine storm and immune dysregulation leads to activation of coagulation cascade. Anticoagulation during hospital stay is standard of care in severe Covid. Post-discharge patients with COVID-19 show incidences of symptomatic VTE ranging from 1.5 to 2·5%. Open-label, Multicentre, Randomised trial conducted at 14 centre in brazil. COVID-19 patients at increased risk for VTE with [IMPROVE] score of ≥4 or Score 2-3 with a D-dimer >500 ng/mL
Randomly assigned (1:1) to receive, at hospital
discharge, Rivaroxaban 10 mg/day or no anticoagulation for 35 days. Funding Bayer
Science Valley Research Institute (São Paulo, Brazil)
was responsible for data and site management and all statistical analysis The largest prospective registry Included 4906 post-discharge patients with COVID- 19 Incidence of the primary endpoint of venous thromboembolism, arterial thromboembolism, or all- cause death was 7·13%. 46% lower in patients prescribed post-discharge prophylactic anticoagulation. STUDY DESIGN Pragmatic, open-label (with blinded adjudication), Multicentre, Randomised, controlled trial. Inclusion criteria ≥18 years of age
Hospitalized for minimum of 3 days with COVID-19
infection On standard-dose Thromboprophylaxis
Total modified Improve venous thromboembolism (VTE)
Risk Score ≥4 or
2 or 3 and D-dimer >500 ng/ml
EXCLUSION CRITERIA Any bleeding within the last 3 months Surgery, biopsy, or trauma within the last 4 weeks or planned Required anticoagulation after discharge
Use of dual antiplatelet therapy during hospitalization
Chronic kidney disease
PROCEDURES Randomized at discharge.
Sample size- 320 patients.
Study drug started within the first 24 h after hospital discharge.
Maintained for 35 days.
During follow up- detailed assessment of chest pain, dyspnoea,
peripheral oedema, pain in the lower limbs, pulse evaluation, and signs of bleeding. FOLLOW UP Two follow up visits On day 7
On day 35
Bilateral lower limb venous Doppler ultrasound and CTPA
were performed. PRIMARY EFFICACY OUTCOMES Primary efficacy outcome- composite of symptomatic/fatal VTE.
Asymptomatic VTE detected by Doppler ultrasound and CT
Arterial thromboembolism (MI, stroke, and major adverse limb
event) and cardiovascular death at day 35.
The primary safety outcome- major bleeding, defined according
to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) criteria. SECONDARY EFFICACY OUTCOME Combination of symptomatic or fatal VTE.
Composite of symptomatic VTE or all-cause mortality.
Composite of symptomatic VTE, MI, Non-haemorrhagic
stroke, or CV death.
The secondary safety outcomes- combination of major,
clinically relevant non-major, and other bleeding, according to ISTH criteria. RESULT Efficacy analyses were done using the intention-to-treat principle.
Primary efficacy outcome at day 35.
Rivaroxaban group- 5 (3·14%) of 159 patients
control group -15 (9·43%) of 159 patients primary efficacy outcome event
(RR 0·33, 95% CI 0·13–0·90; p=0·0293)
Yielding a relative risk reduction of 67%
The primary efficacy outcome was driven mainly by pulmonary embolism in
the control group Primary efficacy and safety outcomes. The primary endpoint was a composite of symptomatic or fatal VTE, asymptomatic VTE detected BY B/L Lower limb USG and CTPA, symptomatic arterial thrombosis and cardiovascular death at day 35. SECONDARY EFFICACY OUTCOME Symptomatic and fatal VTE- Rivaroxaban group - 1 (0·63%) of 159 pts. control group 8 (5·03%) of 159 pts. (RR 0·13, 95% CI 0·02–0·99; p=0·0487).
Symptomatic VTE and all-cause mortality
Rivaroxaban group- 4 (2·52%) of 159 pts.
Control group- 9 (5·66%) of 159 pts.
(RR 0·44, 95% CI 0·14–1·41; p=0·1696)
SUBGROUP ANALYSIS DISCUSSION Extended post-discharge thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban 10 mg/day for 35 days , when compared with no anticoagulation, resulted in better clinical outcome.
Treatment group has-
Lower number of events.
More asymptomatic events.
LIMITATION Open-label design has a potential risk of bias.
Not every patient received CT pulmonary angiogram.
Higher number of imaging evaluations occurred in those