Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Corinne Wittmer, Mark Saltzman, and Paul Van Tassel Dept. of Chemical Engineering, Yale University Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University
Corinne Wittmer, Mark Saltzman, and Paul Van Tassel Dept. of Chemical Engineering, Yale University Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University
Corinne Wittmer,* Mark Saltzman,** and Paul Van Tassel* *Dept. of Chemical Engineering, Yale University **Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University
Biomimetic Coatings
Biomimetic materials possess signaling species mimicking those in vivo Cell membrane protein signaling species cell biomimetic material
Biomimetic coating strategy: signaling species immobilized onto / within coating decouples surface from bulk material properties coating
1. Polycation 2. Wash
3. Polyanion 4. Wash
Decher (1992)
+ + +
+ + + + + - - - -
- - + + +
- + +
Multilayer films containing biomolecules offer several advantages: Simple to produce Applicable to most biomaterial systems Offer control of biomolecule orientation & conformation Offer temporal control of biomolecule accessibility
Fibronectin (Fn)
A matrix protein inducing cell attachment and spreading Composed of modules, contains cell binding site Biomaterials coated with Fn are excellent candidates as tissue engineering substrates
Matrix Assembly S. Aureus NH2 Fibrin Heparin Cell Binding Site S S
Collagen Gelatin
F1
EDB EDA
RGD
F2
F3
IIICS COOH
Objectives
fibronectin 1. Determine adsorption behavior of Fn on a biocompatible multilayer film extent kinetics reversibility degree of film penetration
2.
Determine cell response to Fnterminated multilayer films cell area cell symmetry
cell
Multilayer Film
Polycation: poly(L-lysine) (PLL) MW = 70,000 - 150,000 pK = 10.5 hydrodynamic diameter 28 - 44 nm (pH 7.4, [NaCl] 100 mM) Polyanion: dextran sulfate (DS) MW 500,000 Buffer: HEPES pH = 7.4 [NaCl] = 100 mM Length Scales: Bjerrum length = .72 nm Debye length = .96 nm
O OSO3OSO3O OSO3-
Laser
~
Vibrating sensor crystal Measures adsorbed layer wet mass (i.e. mass of polymer plus mass of solvent)
= uffer rinse
1 % DXS1
400
19 % PLL1
300
1 % D X1
200
% PLL1
100
DXS1
(PLL-DXS)
0 0 PLL1 50 100 150 200 250
Ti e ( in)
Rapid saturation of each layer PLL, DS adsorption steps irreversi le Fil ass ~ exp [ # of layers ]
170% D S1
400
190% PLL1
300
140% DE 1
200
130% PLL1
(PLL-D S)3
D S1
ime (min)
Large wet mass increase during DS steps Wet mass decrease during PLL steps > 90% film mass is water !
100
500
= buffer rinse
ime (min)
/
1000 900 800 700 600 500 400
il
1000
Buffer rinse
ka = 6x10-5 cm/s
900 800
250
300
50
100
150
00
50
ti
( i )
i e
in
rpti
xhi it
on PLL versus DS terminated film Why? DS layer very hydrated, thus resistant to protein adsorption
- X ) n 3
s r e
ensi
ka = 1x10-4 cm/s
n
300