You are on page 1of 54

D i vers i t y wi t h t A d ve rs i t y

ou r Psychologica:l
o F ind S t ren gt h in Ou
How t
Differences

Matija Kovačević | email: matija.kovacevic@adventisti.hr


Diversity without Adversity
• ‘We’re all different.’
• But how exactly?

• Awareness of our real cognitive differences can improve:


• Mutual understanding and appreciation
• Conflict resolution
• Discipleship
• Organisation
• Mission
AUTHENTICCONTRIBUTE
THRIVE
SUSTAINABLE
D i vers i t y wi t h t A d ve rs i t y
ou r Psychologica:l
o F ind S t ren gt h in Ou
How t
Differences

Matija Kovačević | email: matija.kovacevic@adventisti.hr


Diversity without Adversity
‘[T]here are many members, yet one body.’
(1 Cor 12:20 NRSV)

‘For as in one body we ‘There is one body and one


have many members, Spirit ... the whole body,
and not all the members joined and knit together by
have the same function, every ligament with which it
so we, who are many, are is equipped, as each part is
one body in Christ, and working properly, promotes
individually we are the body’s growth in
members one of another.’ building itself up in love.’
(Rom 12:4-5 NRSV) (Eph 4:4.16 NRSV)
Diversity without Adversity
• Gordon D. Fee, The First Epistle to the Corinthians, Revised ed., NICNT (Grand Rapids, Mich.
Cambridge: Eerdmans, 2014), 583 (emphasis added):

• ‘the common denominator of the twofold elaboration of the


analogy (vv. 15-20 and 21-26) is the need for diversity if there
is to be a true body so as not to become a monstrosity. By its
very nature the analogy shifts focus momentarily from the
gifts per se (vv. 15-20) to the diversity of people who make
up the community (vv. 21-26). Paul’s point seems clear: Not
uniformity (their model) but diversity in the context of unity
(God’s model) is essential for a healthy church.’
• ‘The eternal God who is characterized by diversity within unity
has decreed the same for the people who are to bear God’s
likeness, the church.’
Diversity without Adversity

• According to Pew Research, Seventh-day Adventist Church is the most racially diverse church in the United
States (
https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/07/27/the-most-and-least-racially-diverse-u-s-religious-gr
oups
)
• Conversations regarding the diversity of the church focused mainly on:
• Ideological differences (conservatives, liberals, etc.)
• Gender inclusion (especially women ordination)
• Multicultural realities [see Gerardo Marti, A Mosaic of Believers: Diversity and Innovation in a Multiethnic Church
(Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2005)]
Diversity without Adversity
• What about personality?
• Is it not an important expression of God’s image?
• ‘God arranged (ἔθετο) the members in the body’ (1 Cor 12:18)
• The same verb (τίθημι) is used in LXX in the Creation account:
• 1x for putting the stars, moon and sun in the sky: ‘καὶ ἔθετο αὐ τοὺ ς ὁ θεὸ ς
ἐν τῷ στερεώ ματι τοῦ οὐ ρανοῦ ὥ στε φαίνειν ἐπὶ τῆ ς γῆ ς' (Gen 1:17)
• 2x for putting the humans in the garden of Eden: ‘Καὶ ἐφύ τευσεν κύ ριος ὁ
θεὸ ς παρά δεισον ἐν Εδεμ κατὰ ἀ νατολὰ ς καὶ ἔθετο ἐκεῖ τὸ ν ἄ νθρωπον, ὃ ν
ἔπλασεν‘ (Gen 2:8); 'Καὶ ἔλαβεν κύ ριος ὁ θεὸ ς τὸ ν ἄ νθρωπον, ὃ ν ἔπλασεν, καὶ
ἔθετο αὐ τὸ ν ἐν τῷ παραδείσῳ ἐργά ζεσθαι αὐ τὸ ν καὶ φυλά σσειν' (Gen 2:15)
[quoted from Septuaginta: With Morphology, electronic ed. (Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 1979)]

• Diversity, including psychological, is intrinsic to the way God


created humanity
Diversity without Adversity

Isabel Briggs Myers and Peter B. Myers, Gifts Differing:


Understanding Personality Type (Palo Alto, Calif: Davies-Black, 1995)

• Diversity of God’s gifts to the church includes psychological


differences of its members
Development of Jungian Typology
• MBTI (Myers-Briggs Type Indicator) tests used widely in:
• Business (Douglas P. Shuit, “At 60, Myers-Briggs Is Still Sorting out and Identifying People’s Types,” Workforce
Management 82, no. 13 (2003): 72–74)
• Education (Apinun Wethayanugoon., “The Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator for Team Building in Schools,”
Education 115, no. 2 (1994): 258; Claudia T. Melear and Susan Richardson, Learning Styles of African American Children
Which Correspond to the MBTI, March 1, 1994)
• Counselling (Rodney K. Goodyear, “A Debate: Resolved The the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Is a Useful Tool in
Counseling,” Journal of Counseling & Development 67, no. 8 (1989): 435)
• Army (Stephen J. Gerras and Leonard Wong, “Moving Beyond the MBTI,” Military Review 96, no. 2 (2016): 54–57)
• etc.
• 89 of Fortune 100 companies use it for ‘team-building
exercises, leadership coaching, [and] executive talent
management’; 250 of Fortune 1000 companies also use it for
hiring
• https://www.marketplace.org/2018/10/30/business/big-book/myers-briggs-system-evaluate-employees
• https://www.themyersbriggs.com/en-US/Products-and-Services/Myers-Briggs
Development of Jungian Typology
• Psychological Types, 1921
• by Carl Gustav Jung
Development of Jungian Typology

David Keirsey, California State


University, developer of KTS
Development of Jungian Typology

• Mark – Sensing type (practical and realistic, using numbers and choosing words carefully)
• Matthew – Thinking type (a logical writer needing a sense of fairness and justice in his account of Jesus’ suffering and
death, and its correspondence to prophecies)
• Luke – Feeling type (caring a lot about people’s feelings and being tactful as he writes)
• John – Intuitive type (creative and imaginative writer who sees possibilities in the passion and gives essentials
without hair-splitting details)
Development of Jungian Typology

Sigmund Freud, first a friend then a rival of Carl Gustav Jung

• For Jung's complex relationship with Christianity, see C. G. Jung, Murray Stein, and
C. G. Jung, Jung on Christianity (Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1999)
• For Jung’s paranormal experiences, see C. G Jung et al., The Red Book = Liber
Novus: A Reader’s Edition (New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 2012); C. G. Jung and
Aniela Jaffé, Memories, Dreams, Reflections, Rev. ed. (New York: Vintage Books,
1989)
Development of Jungian Typology
• Jung originated the concepts of
extraversion and introversion (as well as
the cognitive pairs of feeling and thinking,
intuition and sensing)
• Myers and Briggs expanded it with the
cognitive attitudes of judging and
perception and provided a final basis for
personality testing
• Naomi Quenk introduced the concept of
‘being in the grip of inferior function’ which
illuminated pitfalls of each type
• Neuroscientist Dario Nardi discovered a
correlation between specific brain activity
patterns and personality types
Development of Jungian Typology

• MBTI types tend to be misunderstood if not explained through


Jungian cognitive functions
• Read criticism and defences of MBTI in Psychology Today
Development of Jungian Typology
Some misconceptions:
• X The term ‘cognitive’ does not refer solely to rational
processes focused on propositional thinking
• Cognition is ‘mental action or process of acquiring
knowledge and understanding through thought,
experience, and the senses.’ (https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/cognition)
• X Cognitive function of Feeling does not refer simply to
emotions
• Instead, it does refer to making decisions based on one’s
sense of rightness and impact on people, rather than on
logical reasoning and rational arrangements.
Eight Cognitive Functions
• Where are we oriented:
• Extraversion (e)
• Introversion (i)
• How we perceive:
• Sensing (S)
• Intuiting (N)
• How we make decisions:
• Thinking (T)
• Feeling (F)
Jung, Psychological Types; Myers, MBTI Manual; Quenk, In the Grip: Our Hidden Personality
Eight Cognitive Functions
ESTP Extraverted ENTP Extraverted ESTJ Extraverted ESFJ Extraverted
ESFP Sensing (Se) ENFP Intuition (Ne) ENTJ Thinking (Te) ENFJ Feeling (Fe)
Oriented outwardly Oriented outwardly Attain order and accuracy Attain social harmony
Experiencing the world Seeking new ideas in the external world Sensitive to people’s needs
For the present Seeing future possibilities Implementing solutions Making others happy
Overindulgence in sensual Unrealistic, losing control Overly critical, bossy, Sentimentalism, co-
pleasure, oblivious to over facts, imagining acting too fast dependency, hypersensitivity
future consequences catastrophes to relationships

ISTJ Introverted INTJ Introverted ISTP Introverted ISFP Introverted


ISFJ Sensing (Si) INFJ Intuition (Ni) INTP Thinking (Ti) INFP Feeling (Fi)
Oriented inwardly Oriented inwardly Attain order and accuracy Attain inner harmony
Storing the details Creating inner vision in internal thoughts Sensitivity to values
For later retrospective use Seeing insightful patterns Arriving at conclusions Living authentically
Withdrawal and depression, Seeing non-existent Overly critical, sceptical, One-sided activism,
excessive ‘living in the past’, connections and meaning, compulsive in the search outbursts of emotion,
obsessiveness becoming solipsistic for truth hypersensitivity to inner
states
Formation of Types
Formation of Types
e.g. ESTJ

Fi
Te N
Si
Formation of Types
Judging functions
(Thinking & Feeling) Extraversion
Introversion

Perceiving functions
(Intuiting & Sensing)
INFP
Feeling is introverted (Fi) as this function is not
used by INFP to relate to the world
Intuition is extraverted
(Ne) as this is how INFP
Feeling relates to the world

Intuition

Perceiving function
Judging function

BUT since INFP


prefers introversion...
INFP

Te

Ne S
Fi
ENFP

T
e
Ne Si
Fi
Si
T
Ne Fi
Formation of Types
• Preferences are progressive, not binary
• There are ambiverts (people leaning just slightly to the one
side of the extraversion–introversion preference)

Progressive tests:

- Dario Nardi’s
Keys2Cognition

- HumanMetrics
Jung Typology Test

- Official MBTI test


Formation of Types
Preference Adaptive Form One-Sided Form Preference Adaptive Form One-Sided Form

Extraverted Charming Boastful Thinking Lucid Argumentative


Attitude Enthusiastic Intrusive Judgment Objective Intolerant
Sociable Loud Succinct Coarse

Introverted Deep Aloof Feeling Appreciative Evasive


Attitude Discreet Inhibited Judgment Considerate Hypersensitive
Tranquil Withdrawn Tactful Vague

Sensing Pragmatic Dull Judging Efficient Compulsive


Perception Precise Fuzzy Attitude Planful Impatient
Detailed Obsessive Responsible Rigid

Intuitive Imaginative Eccentric Perceiving Adaptable Procrastinating


Perception Ingenious Erratic Attitude Easygoing Unreliable
Insightful Unrealistic Flexible Scattered

Adaptive form = result of the Spirit’s ‘renewing of our minds’ (Romans 12)
Formation of Types
Extraverted Charming
Attitude Enthusiastic
Sociable
Ne Intuitive Imaginative
Perception Ingenious
Insightful

ENFP

Ne
Extraverted Boastful
Attitude Intrusive
Loud
Intuitive Eccentric
Perception Erratic
Unrealistic ISTJ
Being in the Grip
• Inattention to personality development can
result in a prolonged experience of ‘being in
the grip of inferior function’ (Quenk)
• Occurs occasionaly in the midst of stress, crises
and mental fatigue – dangerous if it persists
• If chronic, it renders the person virtually
unrecognisable – shadow functions take over
• Can be triggered by mental health problems
(e.g. depression or anxiety), and further
exacerbate them; must be tackled promptly!
• Quenk; also https://mbti-notes.tumblr.com
MBTI Types
MBTI Types
MBTI Types
Sensing plus Thinking (…ST…) Cluster
• approach life and work in an objective
and analytical manner
• focus on realities and practical
applications in their work
• careers that require a technical
approach to things, ideas, or people; less
interested in nurturing of others or
attending to their growth and
development
• often found in business, management,
banking, applied sciences, construction,
production, police, and the military
Sensing plus Feeling (…SF…) Cluster
• approach life and work in a warm
people-oriented manner
• focus on realities and hands-on careers
• found in human services and in careers
that require a sympathetic approach to
people; less interested in careers that
require an analytical and impersonal
approach to information and ideas
• often found in the clergy, teaching,
health care, child care, sales and office
work, and personal services
Intuition plus Feeling (…NF…) Cluster
• approach life and work in a warm and
enthusiastic manner
• focus on ideas and possibilities,
particularly “possibilities for people”
• found in careers that require
communication skills, a focus on the
abstract, and an understanding of others;
less interested in careers that require an
impersonal or technical approach to
things and factual data
• often found in the arts, the clergy,
counseling and psychology, writing,
education, research, and health care
Intuition plus Thinking (…NT…) Cluster
• approach life and work in a logical and
objective manner
• focus on possibilities, particularly
possibilities that have a technical
application
• found in careers that require an impersonal
and analytical approach to ideas,
information and people; less interested in
careers that require a warm, sympathetic,
and hands-on approach to helping people
• often found in the sciences, law, computers,
the arts, engineering, management, and
technical work
Flow States of MBTI Types
Flow States of MBTI Types
• For ESTP and ESFP types, this was: ‘Handling a
crisis during role-play’
• For ISTJ and ISFJ tpes, it was: ‘Reviewing the
past in detail’
• For INTJ and INFJ types, it was: ‘Envisioning
the future as it will be’
• ISFP and INFP types achieved a flow while
‘Listening to others’
• ESTJ achieved it while ‘Listening to an
authority figure’ only
Ecclesial Implications
• Mutual Understanding and
Appreciation
• When we understand that someone’s
psychological difference is
ontologically real instead of just
guessed or arbitrarily ascribed,
suddenly there is more tolerance,
empathy, appreciation and cooperation
• It can change everyday church
situations
• e.g., accepting introvert worship experience,
such as low-key reactions or sitting in the back
in order to not be distracted by role-playing, etc.
Ecclesial Implications
• Conflict Resolution
• By understanding we have different
approaches
• Ideological and theological tensions could
be tempered, too
• e.g. Introverted Sensing types can be prone to guard
tradition, while Extroverted Intuitive types tend to
constantly seek something new
• or, e.g., Thinking types are naturally more prone to
analytical and critical approaches, while Intuitive
types enjoy constructive and systematic approaches
• Both approaches are valid if conducted
responsibly under the guidance of the Holy
Spirit
Ecclesial Implications
• Conflict Resolution
Ecclesial Implications
• Discipleship
• MBTI tests have been used for a long
time in education to assess learning
styles
• e.g., Sensing types can feel impatient with
constant taking in of information, wanting to
learn by action, while Intuitive types can
constantly dwell on ideas
• Assess the membership and develop
adequate discipleship activities that
will engage all learning styles
Ecclesial Implications
• Organisation
• Assign roles according to types
• e.g., ENFP to functions where lots of
innovation, optimism and creativity is
needed (e.g., designing fresh missional
methods and events). On the other hand,
ISTJ ideal for functions where consistency
and fact-checking is needed (e.g. treasury)
• Create entirely new ministries
based on types in the church
Ecclesial Implications
• Mission
• Being attentive to the affinities of each type in the church
and allowing the mission to arise from the bottom-up
• Result: church where members will reach the people they
need to reach in their own God-given way
• Mission ceases to be an erratic set of short-lived outbursts
of individual projects, and becomes a sustained way of life
where members thrive and contribute in an authentic way
Possible Pitfalls
• Typology must not become prescriptive
• it pertains only to a small portion of a human individual
• though it provides significant insights into cognitive operations, it must
not become an all-encompassing lens through which we observe ourselves
and other church members
• Typology must not become an excuse
• it must not be used as a cover for character stagnation, misbehaviour, and
non-involvement
• Quenk’s warnings of ‘one-sided’ manifestations of the cognitive functions
and attitudes must be clearly presented and reiterated
• every type should be continuously developing
Conclusion
• The most important lesson from typology: realization that
we are psychologically different in real and tangible ways
• The reality of psychological diversity is implicit in the
body metaphor in the New Testament
• Also repeatedly touched upon in the writings of Ellen
White (a lot of it compiled in Mind, Character and
Personality)
Conclusion
• ‘It is the Lord's plan that there shall be unity in diversity. [Letter 111, 1903]
… Why do we need a Matthew, a Mark, a Luke, a John, a Paul, and all these
other writers who have borne their testimony in regard to the life of the
Saviour during His earthly ministry? Why could not one of the disciples have
written a complete record, and thus have given us a connected account of
Christ's life and work? The Gospels differ, yet in them the record blends in
one harmonious whole. One writer brings in points that another does not
bring in. If these points are essential, why did not all the writers mention
them? It is because the minds of men differ and do not comprehend things
in exactly the same way. Some truths appeal much more strongly to the
minds of one class of persons than to others; some points appear to be
much more important to some than to others. The same principle applies to
speakers. Some speakers dwell at considerable lengths on points that others
would pass by quickly or would not mention at all. Thus the truth is
presented more clearly by several than by one. [MS 87, 1907.]
Conclusion
• ... ‘every mind has its peculiar weakness and its peculiar
strength. One man's mind will supply another man's
deficiency.’ [Letter 50, 1897] … The Lord does not desire
that our individuality shall be destroyed; it is not His
purpose that any two persons shall be exactly alike in tastes
and dispositions. All have characteristics peculiar to
themselves, and these are not to be destroyed, but to be
trained, molded, fashioned, after the similitude of Christ.
The Lord turns the natural aptitudes and capabilities into
profitable channels. [Letter 20, 1894]’ (2MCP 423-427)
Essential Jungian Typology/MBTI Reading:
Jung, C. G. Psychological Types. Routledge classics. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY: Routledge, 2017 [1921].
Jung, C. G. The Development of Personality: Collected Works of C.G. Jung: 17. Edited by Gerhard Adler. 1 edition.
Routledge, 1954.
Myers, Isabel Briggs, and Peter B. Myers. Gifts Differing: Understanding Personality Type. Palo Alto, Calif: Davies-Black,
1995.
Myers, Isabel Briggs. Introduction to Type. Place of publication not identified: Cpp, Inc., 1998.
Myers, Isabel Briggs, ed. MBTI Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. 3rd ed.
Palo Alto, Calif: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1998.
Nardi, Dario. Neuroscience of Personality: Brain Savvy Insights for All Types of People. Los Angeles, Calif.: Radiance
House, 2011.
Quenk, Naomi L. Essentials of Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Assessment. 2nd ed. Hoboken, N.J: John Wiley & Sons, 2009.
Quenk, Naomi L. In the Grip: Our Hidden Personality by Naomi L. Quenk. Palo Alto, Calif: Consulting Psychologists Press,
1994.
Quenk, Naomi L. Was That Really Me? How Everyday Stress Brings out Our Hidden Personality. 1st ed. Palo Alto, Calif:
CPP, 2002.

Matija Kovačević | email: matija.kovacevic@adventisti.hr


LINKS:
• Official MBTI online test: www.mbtionline.com
• Official descriptions of 16 MBTI Types:
https://www.myersbriggs.org/my-mbti-personality-type/mbti-basics/the-16-mbti-types.htm
Free MBTI tests:
• Dario Nardi’s Keys2Cognition: www.keys2cognition.com/explore.htm
• HumanMetrics Jung Typology Test: http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/jtypes2.asp

• Criticism of MBTI: https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/give-and-take/201309/goodbye-mbti-the-fad-won-t-die


• Defence of MBTI: https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/cui-bono/201603/are-scores-the-mbti-totally-meaningless
• Balanced view: https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/cutting-edge-leadership/201402/the-truth-about-myers-briggs-types
• Official response to criticism by Myers-Briggs Foundation:
https://www.myersbriggs.org/more-about-personality-type/misconceptions-about-the-MBTI-assessment/Misconceptions_About_th
e_MBTI_Assessment.pdf
• MBTI Notes (quality blog with materials on cognitive functions, including ‘in the grip’ experience): https://mbti-notes.tumblr.com

Matija Kovačević | email: matija.kovacevic@adventisti.hr


Full Bibliography (part 1):
Avis, Paul, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Ecclesiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
  Bianchi, Eugene C. “Jungian Psychology and Religious Experience.” Anglican Theological Review 61, no. 2 (1979): 182–99.
  Bouchard Jr., Thomas J., and Yoon-Mi Hur. “Genetic and Environmental Influences on the Continuous Scales of the
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: An Analysis Based on Twins Reared Apart.” Journal of Personality 66, no. 2 (1998): 135–49.
  Bregman, Lucy. “Fantasy: The Experiencer and the Interpreter.” Journal of the American Academy of Religion XLIII, no. 4
(1975): 723–40.
  Broadribb, Donald, Marilyn Holly, and Norma Lyons. The Mystical Chorus: Jung and the Religious Dimension. Alexandria,
N.S.W., Australia: Millenium Books, 1995.
  Chapman, G. Clarke. “Jung and Christology.” Journal of Psychology and Theology 25, no. 4 (1997): 414–26.
  Charet, F X. “A Dialogue between Psychology and Theology: The Correspondence of C G Jung and Victor White.” Journal
of Analytical Psychology 35, no. 4 (1990): 421–41.
  Dohe, Carrie B. Jung’s Wandering Archetype: Race and Religion in Analytical Psychology. London New York: Routledge,
2016.
Dourley, John P. On Behalf of the Mystical Fool: Jung on the Religious Situation. Hove, East Sussex ; New York: Routledge,
2010.
  ———. Paul Tillich, Carl Jung, and the Recovery of Religion. London ; New York: Routledge, 2008.
  Drury, Canon. “The Bible Today—Answer to Jung.” The Modern Churchman 20, no. 3 (1977): 62–70.

Matija Kovačević | email: matija.kovacevic@adventisti.hr


Full Bibliography (part 2):
Ellwood, Robert S. The Politics of Myth: A Study of C.G. Jung, Mircea Eliade, and Joseph Campbell. SUNY series, issues in
the study of religion. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1999.
Emre, Merve. The Personality Brokers: The Strange History of Myers-Briggs and the Birth of Personality Testing. First
edition. New York: Doubleday, a division of Penguin Random House LLC, 2018.
———. What’s Your Type?: The Strange History of Myers-Briggs and the Birth of Personality Testing, 2018.
Fee, Gordon D. The First Epistle to the Corinthians. Revised ed. The new international commentary on the New
Testament. Grand Rapids, Mich. Cambridge: Eerdmans, 2014.
Francis, Leslie J., and Giuseppe Crea. “Openness to Mystical Experience and Psychological Type: A Study among Italians.”
Mental Health, Religion & Culture 20, no. 4 (2017): 384–97.
Francis, Leslie J., and Susan H. Jones. “Psychological Type and Tolerance for Religious Uncertainty.” Pastoral Psychology
47, no. 4 (1999): 253–59.
Francis, Leslie J., and Greg Smith. “Separating Sheep from Goats: Using Psychological Type Theory in a Preaching
Workshop on Matthew 25:31-46.” Journal of Adult Theological Education 9, no. 2 (2012): 175–91.
Gerras, Stephen J., and Leonard Wong. “Moving Beyond the MBTI.” Military Review 96, no. 2 (2016): 54–57.
Goodyear, Rodney K. “A Debate: Resolved The the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Is a Useful Tool in Counseling.” Journal of
Counseling & Development 67, no. 8 (1989): 435.
Jung, C. G. Psychological Types. Routledge classics. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY: Routledge, 2017.
  ———. Psychology and Religion. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992.

Matija Kovačević | email: matija.kovacevic@adventisti.hr


Full Bibliography (part 3):
Jung, C. G. The Development of Personality: Collected Works of C.G. Jung: 17. Edited by Gerhard Adler. 1 edition.
Routledge, 1954. 
Jung, C. G., and Aniela Jaffé. Memories, Dreams, Reflections. Rev. ed. New York: Vintage Books, 1989.
  Jung, C. G, and Sonu Shamdasani. Answer to Job. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2011.
  Jung, C. G, Sonu Shamdasani, Ulrich Hoerni, Mark Kyburz, and John Peck. The Red Book = Liber Novus: A Reader’s
Edition. New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 2012.
  Jung, C. G., Murray Stein, and C. G. Jung. Jung on Christianity. Princeton paperbacks. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University
Press, 1999.
  Kelsey, Morton. “Reply to Analytical Psychology and Human Evil.” Journal of Psychology and Theology 14, no. 4 (1986):
282–84.
  King, Derek Edwin Noel. “The Four Pauls and Their Letters: A Study in Personality-Critical Analysis.” Mental Health,
Religion & Culture 15, no. 9 (2012): 863–71.
  Kujawa-Holbrook, Edited Sheryl, and Karen Montango. “INIUSTICE AND THE CARE OF SOULS: TAKING OPPRESSION
SERIOUSLY IN PASTORAL CARE.” (n.d.): 3.
  Long, Thomas G. “Myers-Briggs and Other Modern Astrologies.” Theology Today 49, no. 3 (1992): 291–95.
Marti, Gerardo. A Mosaic of Believers: Diversity and Innovation in a Multiethnic Church. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University
Press, 2005.
  Meier, Carl Alfred. The Psychology of C.G. Jung: With Special Reference to the Association Experiment of C.G. Jung.
Boston, Mass: Sigo Press, 1984.
Matija Kovačević | email: matija.kovacevic@adventisti.hr
Full Bibliography (part 4):
Myers, Isabel Briggs. Introduction to Type. Place of publication not identified: Cpp, Inc., 1998.
  ———, ed. MBTI Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. 3rd ed. Palo Alto,
Calif: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1998.
  Myers, Isabel Briggs, and Peter B. Myers. Gifts Differing: Understanding Personality Type. Palo Alto, Calif: Davies-Black,
1995.
  Nardi, Dario. Neuroscience of Personality: Brain Savvy Insights for All Types of People. Los Angeles, Calif.: Radiance
House, 2011.
  Perkins, Pheme. First Corinthians. Paideia : commentaries on the New Testament. Grand Rapids, Mich: Baker Academic,
2012.
  Quenk, Naomi L. Essentials of Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Assessment. 2nd ed. Essentials of psychological assessment
series. Hoboken, N.J: John Wiley & Sons, 2009.
  ———. In the Grip: Our Hidden Personality by Naomi L. Quenk. Palo Alto, Calif: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1994.
  ———. Was That Really Me? How Everyday Stress Brings out Our Hidden Personality. 1st ed. Palo Alto, Calif. : [Lanham,
Md.]: Davies-Black Pub. ; Distributed by National Book Network, 2002.
Ryce-Menuhin, Joel. Jung and the Monotheisms: Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. London; New York: Routledge, 1994.
Schaer, Hans. Religion and the Cure of Souls in Jung’s Psychology. London: New York : Routledge, 2002.

Matija Kovačević | email: matija.kovacevic@adventisti.hr


Full Bibliography (part 5):
Smith, Curtis D. Jung’s Quest for Wholeness: A Religious and Historical Perspective. Albany: State University of New York
Press, 1990.
  Stein, Murray. “Of Texts and Contexts: Reflections upon the Publication of The Jung-White Letters: Of Texts and Contexts:
Reflections on The Jung-White Letters.” Journal of Analytical Psychology 52, no. 3 (2007): 297–319.
  Stiefel, Robert E. “Preaching to All the People: The Use of Jungian Typology and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator.”
Anglican Theological Review 74, no. 2 (1992): 175–202.
  Troupe, Carol. “One Body, Many Parts: A Reading of 1 Corinthians 12:12-27.” Black Theology 6, no. 1 (2008): 32–45.
  Wethayanugoon., Apinun. “The Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator for Team Building in Schools.” Education 115, no.
2 (1994): 258.
  Wilde, Douglass J. Jung’s Personality Theory Quantified. London ; New York: Springer, 2011.
  Williams, Lee, Tracy Tappan, and Dennis A. Bagarrozi. “The Utility of the Myers-Briggs Perspective in Couple Counseling:
A Clinical Framework.” American Journal of Family Therapy 23, no. 4 (1995): 367–71.
  Young-Eisendrath, Polly. Hags and Heroes: A Feminist Approach to Jungian Psychotherapy with Couples. Studies in
Jungian psychology by Jungian analysts 18. Toronto, Canada: Inner City Books, 1984.

Matija Kovačević | email: matija.kovacevic@adventisti.hr

You might also like