Open systems theory • It refers simply to the concept that organizations are strongly influenced by their environment. The environment consists of other organizations that exert various forces of an economic, political, or social nature • Open systems theory was developed after World War II in reaction to earlier theories of organizations, such as the human relations perspective of Elton Mayo and the administrative theories of Henri Fayol, which treated the organization largely as a self-contained entity. • Institutional theorists see organizations as a means by which the societal values and beliefs are embedded in organizational structure and expressed in organizational change • Resource dependency theorists see the organization as adapting to the environment as dictated by its resource providers. • Although there is a great variety in the perspectives provided by open systems theories, they share the perspective that an organization’s survival is dependent upon its relationship with the environment • Open systems theory has profoundly altered how we understand schools as organizations and the demands placed upon educational leaders. • Treating schools as if they are independent of their environment would lead to wide misperceptions of the driving factors behind organizational change. • Contemporary studies of accountability movements, teacher professionalization, and instructional leadership all benefit from a strongly open systems approach to understanding environmental demands and the resulting adaptation in school policy and its implementation, or lack thereof. • Indeed, today scholars are rightfully dubious of work that fails to consider the rich context in which schools develop. Any organization can be described as a “system.” • A system is a group of components (or parts) that interact with each other and aredependent on each other to serve a common goal. • Organizations and other social systems can be “closed” or “open” systems. • Closed systems have boundaries that cannot be penetrated by new information orideas. • Open systems have permeable boundaries (or boundaries which allow things to passthrough them) • Open systems interact with their environments and constantly let in new informationand ideas so that they can continue to grow. OPEN-SYSTEM • An open system is a system that regularly exchanges feedback with its external environment. • Open systems are systems, of course, so inputs, processes, outputs, goals, assessment and evaluation, and learning are all important. • Aspects that arecritically critically important important to open systems systems include include the boundaries, boundaries, external external environment and equifinality. • Healthy open systems continuously exchange feedback with their environments, analyze that feedback, adjust internal systems as needed 1. BOUNDARIES
• All systems have boundaries, although the boundaries can be difficult
to identify because systems can be very dynamic. Open systems have porous boundaries through which useful feedback can readily be exchanged and understood. • Closed systems, unlike open systems, have hard boundaries through whichlittle information is exchanged. Organizations that have closed boundariesoften are unhealthy. Examples include bureaucracies, monopolies and stagnating systems. 2. EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENT • The external environment includes a wide variety of needs and influences that can affect the organization, but which the organization cannot directly control. Influences can be political, economic, ecological, societal and technological in nature. • A highly effective organization is regularly exchanging feedback with its external environment – it is an open system. Healthy organizations regularly try to understand their environments through use of environmentals canning, market research and evaluations. 3. OUTCOMES (RESULTS AMONG CUSTOMERS) • Outcomes are critically important to the success of an organization. Outcomesare in regard to the changes, or benefits, that customers accomplish as a resultof using a particular product or service. • Outcomes are usually specified in terms of changed: • 1. Knowledge (usually short-term outcomes). • 2. Behaviors, notably those that comprise useful skills (often intermediateoutcomes). 3. Attitudes, values and conditions, such as increased security, stability or pride(usually long-term outcomes). 4. EQUIFINALITY
• Equifinality means that the same or similar results can be achieved by
using avariety of different processes. For example, management can achieve the sameresults by using different inputs or by using different processes with the same inputs. • In contrast, closed systems have one right way to do things. For example, in heavily bureaucratic organizations, a person must finish the necessary procedures regardless of how useful an intended result will be for the organization – the focus is on doing things right, rather than doing the right things.