Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 2
Collaboration, Interpersonal
Communication, and Business
Etiquette
Think through your suggested Many business documents must illustrate complex relationships between ideas
changes carefully. and other information, so isolated and superficial edits can do more harm than
good.
Discuss improvements rather Instead of saying “this is confusing,” for instance, explain how the writing can be
than flaws. improved to make it clearer.
Focus on controllable behavior. The writer may not have control over every variable that affected the quality of the
message, so focus on those aspects the writer can control.
Be specific. Comments such as “I don’t get this” or “Make this clearer” don’t give the writer
much direction.
Keep feedback impersonal. Focus comments on the message, not on the person who created it.
Verify understanding. If in doubt, ask for confirmation from the recipient to make sure that the person
understood your feedback.
Time your feedback carefully. Respond in a timely fashion so that the writer has sufficient time to implement the
changes you suggest.
Highlight any limitations your If you didn’t have time to give the document a thorough edit, or if you’re not an
feedback may have. expert in some aspect of the content, let the writer know so that he or she can
handle your comments appropriately.
Give the speaker nonverbal cues (such as nodding to Fail to give the speaker nonverbal feedback
show agreement or raising eyebrows to show surprise
or skepticism)
Save questions or points of disagreement until an Interrupt whenever they disagree or don’t understand
appropriate time
Overlook stylistic differences and focus on the Are distracted by or unduly influenced by stylistic
speaker’s message differences; are Judgmental
Sources: Madelyn Burley-Allen, Listening: The Forgotten Skill (New York: Wiley, 1995),
70–71, 119–120; Judi Brownell, Listening: Attitudes, Principles, and Skills (Boston: Allyn
& Bacon, 2002), 3, 9, 83, 89, 125; Larry Barker and Kittie Watson, Listen Up (New York: St.
Martin’s, 2000), 8, 9, 64.