Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Business Law
LAW1014
Introduction
Ways in which a contract can be
discharged
By agreement By Performance
Discharge
from
Contract
By Breach By Frustration
Discharge by
Agreement
Definition
Section 63, Contracts Act 1950
S. 63
Parties
agree
Parties have
They now
a contract Something
want to be
between happens…
free
them
Discharge by
Performance
Discharge by Performance
The Duty to Perform
Parties must
perform
Section 38
Cards face up on
Fair open dealing
the table
Discharge by Performance
Principles-performance (section 38)
S 38(1)
S 38 Parties are not
bound
Death of one of
the parties
If parties provide
E.g. rescission a way for release
(s 63) (s 38(2))
Discharge by Performance
Principles- offer to perform (OTP) (section 39)
S 39
OTP for goods –
Unconditional person receiving
S 39(2): delivery of goods
Conditions must be allowed
for OTP to inspect the
Reasonable
goods
Discharge by Performance
Principles- offer to perform (section 39)
Case example:
a) See MM Ally & Co v Chellamah [1948] 1 M.L.J
202
b) Interfoto Picture Library Ltd v Stiletto Visual
Programmes Ltd [1989] 1 Q.B. 433
c) Shencourt Sdn Bhd v Aseambankers Malaysia
Bhd [2011] M.L.J.U 552
d) section 68, Contracts Act 1950
Discharge by Performance
Principles – who performs (section 41)
Partial
Performance
Full
performance Ming & Co v Leong
(38(1) Ping Ching [1964] 1
M.L.J 312: Entire
obligations
Exception:
Partial Question of
Performance fact in each
case
Discharge by Performance
Partial Performance
Claim
Warranties Breach Damages
(section 74)
Discharge by Breach
Section 40, Contacts Act 1950 Claim
Refuse to Disabled
perform from
performing
Discharge by Breach
Section 40, Contacts Act 1950 Interpretation
If promisor intended
to perform /offered to
Loke Yuen Cheng v
perform BUT was
Vimtex Sdn Bhd,
refused
[1998] 4 M.L.J 169
Discharge by Breach
Section 40, Contacts Act 1950 Interpretation
1. Araprop Development Sdn Bhd v Leong Chee Kong, [2008] 1 M.L.J 783.
2. Loke Yuen Cheng v Vimtex Sdn Bhd [1998] 4 M.L.J 169 at p. 174.
3. Nirwana Construction Sdn Bhd v Pengarah Jabatan Kerja Raya Negeri
Sembilan Darul Khusus [2008] 4 M.L.J 157, at pp. 165-166,
4. Sik Hong Photo Sdn Bhd v Ch' ng Beng Choo (suing for and on behalf of
Ng Hua’s estate, deceased), [2010] 3 M.L.J 633 (total failure of
consideration)
5. Fibrosa Spolka Akcyjna v Fairbairn Lawson Combe Barbour Ltd [1943]
A.C 32, at p. 48.
6. Berjaya Times Squares Sdn Bhd (formerly known as Berjaya Ditan Sdn
Bhd) v M Concept Sdn Bhd [2010] 1 M.L.J 597, at p. 605, per Gopal Sri
Ram F.C.J (F.C).
Discharge by Frustration
What is frustration?