Professional Documents
Culture Documents
of Traffic Flow
• Traffic flow theory involves the development
of mathematical relationships among the
primary elements of a traffic stream: flow,
density, and speed.
Primary Elements of Traffic Flow
• Flow
• Density
• Speed
• Gap or headway between two vehicles in a
traffic stream
Flow
• Flow (q) is the equivalent hourly rate at which
vehicles pass a point on a highway during a time
period less than 1 hour. It can be determined by:
Density
• Density (k), sometimes referred to as
concentration, is the number of vehicles
traveling over a unit length of highway at an
instant in time.
• The unit length is usually 1 mile (mi) thereby
making vehicles per mile (veh/mi) the unit of
density.
Speed
• Speed (u) is the distance traveled by a vehicle
during a unit of time. It can be expressed in
miles per hour (mi/h), kilometers per hour
(km/h), or feet per second (ft /sec).
Two types of mean speeds
• Time mean speed - is the arithmetic mean of
the speeds of vehicles passing a point on a
highway during an interval of time.
• Space mean speed - is the harmonic mean of
the speeds of vehicles passing a point on a
highway during an interval of time.
Time Mean Speed
Space Mean Speed
• It is obtained by dividing the total distance
traveled by two or more vehicles on a section
of highway by the total time required by these
vehicles to travel that distance.
• This is the speed that is involved in flow-
density relationships.
Space Mean Speed
Time Headway
• Time headway (h) is the difference between
the time the front of a vehicle arrives at a
point on the highway and the time the front of
the next vehicle arrives at that same point.
• Time headway is usually expressed in seconds.
Space Headways
• Space headway (d) is the distance between
the front of a vehicle and the front of the
following vehicle and is usually expressed in
feet.
Five vehicles were traversing a 2-km highway and the following
data were taken:
Vehicle Time (min)
1 1.8
2 1.4
3 1.6
4 1.5
5 1.3
• Queue discharge
– Traffic flow that has just passed through a bottleneck and is
accelerating back to the FFS of the freeway.
• Oversaturated
– Traffic flow that is influenced
by the effects of a
downstream bottleneck.
Sf
Free Flow Speed
Uncongested Flow
Speed (mph)
Sm
Optimal flow,
Congested Flow Flow (veh/hr) capacity, vm
Uncongested Flow
• Driver population
– Non-commuters suck more at driving
– They may affect capacity
• Capacity
– Corresponds to LOS E and v/c = 1.0
Definitions – Level of Service (LOS)
LOS Calculation
• Does not consider
– Special lanes reserved for a particular type of vehicle (HOV, truck,
climbing, etc.)
– Extended bridge and tunnel segments
– Segments near a toll plaza
– Facilities with FFS < 55 mi/h or > 75 mi/h
– Demand conditions in excess of capacity
– Influence of downstream blockages or queuing
– Posted speed limit
– Extent of police enforcement
– Intelligent transportation system features
– Capacity-enhancing effects of ramp metering
Freeway LOS
Input
Geometric Data
Measured FFS or BFFS
Volume
BFFS Input
Determine LOS
LOS Criteria for Basic Freeway Segments
Freeway LOS
Determining FFS
• Measure FFS in the field
– Low to moderate traffic conditions
V
vp
PHF N f HV f p
• Typical values
– 0.80 to 0.95
– Lower PHF characteristic of rural or off-peak
– Higher PHF typical of urban peak-hour
V
PHF
V15 4
V = hourly volume (veh/hr) for hour of analysis
V15 = maxiumum 15-min. flow rate within hour of analysis
4 = Number of 15-min. periods per hour
Freeway LOS
• Two-step process
– Determine passenger-car equivalents (ET)
– Determine fHV
Freeway LOS
Determine fHV
1
f HV
1 PT ET 1 PR E R 1
• Two-step process
– Determine passenger-car equivalents (ET)
– Determine fHV
Freeway LOS
For 55 < FFS ≤ 70 mph AND (3400 – 30FFS) < vp ≤ (1700 + 10FFS)
1 v p 30 FFS 3400
2.6
Determine Density
• Calculate density using:
vp
D
S
D = density (pc/mi/ln)
vp = flow rate (pc/hr/ln)
S = average passenger-car speed (mph)
LOS Criteria for Basic Freeway Segments
LOS
Determine
Freeway LOS
From WSDOT
I – 90 “fat driver” syndrome
Pavement Condition
• Defined by users (drivers)
• Develop methods to relate physical attributes
to driver ratings
• Result is usually a numerical scale
p0
Serviceability (PSI)
p0 - pt
pt
Time
Design Parameters
• Subgrade
• Loads
• Environment
Subgrade
• Characterized by strength
and/or stiffness
– California Bearing Ratio (CBR)
• Measures shearing resistance
• Units: percent
• Typical values: 0 to 20
– Resilient Modulus (MR)
• Measures stress-strain relationship
• Units: psi or MPa
• Typical values: 3,000 to 40,000 psi
• Load Equivalency
– Generalized fourth power approximation
4
load
relative damage factor
18,000 lb.
Typical LEFs
6
5.11
5
ESALs per Vehicle
1.85
2
1.35
1
0.0007 0.10
0
Car Delivery Truck Loaded 18-Wheeler Loaded 40' Bus Loaded 60'
Articulated Bus
• Rigid Pavement
– Portland cement concrete (PCC) pavements
– Called “rigid” since PCC’s high modulus of elasticity does not allow
them to flex appreciably
– About 6.5% of paved U.S. roads use rigid pavement
Flexible Pavement
• Structure
– Surface course
– Base course
– Subbase course
– Subgrade
Types of Flexible Pavement
Dense-graded
Open-graded Gap-graded
FYI – NOT TESTABLE
Slipform
Fixed form
Pavement Design
• Several typical methods
– Design catalog
– Empirical
• 1993 AASHTO method
– Mechanistic-empirical
• New AASHTO method (as yet unreleased)
Empirical
• 1993 AASHTO Flexible Equation
PSI
log10
4.5 1.5
log10 W18 Z R S o 9.36 log10 SN 1 0.20 2.32 log10 M R 8.07
1094
0.40
SN 15.19
• W18 (loading)
– Predicted number of ESALs over the pavement’s life.
• SN (structural number)
– Abstract number expressing structural strength
– SN = a1D1 + a2D2m2 + a3D3m3 + …
• Cd (drainage coefficient)
– Relative loss of strength due to drainage characteristics and the total
time it is exposed to near-saturated conditions
– Usually taken as 1.0
Terms – Rigid
• J (load transfer coefficient)
– Accounts for load transfer efficiency
– Lower J-factors = better load transfer
– Between 3.8 (undoweled JPCP) and 2.3 (CRCP with tied shoulders)
• Muench, S.T.; Mahoney, J.P. and Pierce, L.M. (2003) The WSDOT
Pavement Guide Interactive. WSDOT, Olympia, WA.
http://guides.ce.washington.edu/uw/wsdot
• Muench, S.T. (2002) WAPA Asphalt Pavement Guide. WAPA, Seattle, WA.
http://www.asphaltwa.com