Problem Area • Starting points for library research (in a large research university setting) • Unfamiliar domain and terminology for many users • Representing the collection with consideration to user information needs • Diverse range of users • First step: Are there successful models? Typical Library Page Considerations • Organizational issues – We were designing in a “bubble” • External limitations – Third-party databases (formats, interfaces) – Integration problems (bundling) • Technologies on the horizon – Fulltext searches across databases Our Initial Thoughts • Goals – Understandable labeling – Guiding the user – Some degree of integration • Hypothesis – Should provide browse and search • Approach – Need to combine library organizational principles with web design principles First Pass (Lo-Fi Prototype) • Front screen: – Quick, simple access to databases – Not intended to be top-level library page – Provide browsing and subject keyword searching First Pass (Lo-Fi Prototype) • Advanced search: – Subject keywords – Date coverage – Type of content (fulltext, abstracts, cites) • BUT incompatible with user expectations and behavior. Usability Heuristics • Design for learnability and understandability • Use information hierarchies • Provide paths of entry with predictable outcomes • Design for repeat users and novices • Provide/support efficient & flexible navigation Usability Heuristics, continued • Use clear & consistent terminology • Provide descriptive information • Ensure integration & completeness • Make help available • Practice user-oriented design (practice makes perfect?) Our Solution Subject-Based Approach Different Types of Resources (Format) All Databases View All Databases by Subject Description/Instructions Technical Issues in Prototype • Technical choices – Web and database – Browser features • The data set – Database of electronic resources – Simple flat file Technical Issues in Prototype II • Solutions – CGI scripting, Perl 5, Sprite module – Portability, flexibility, stability – Early development • Proprietary solutions would be overkill for this prototype • More interface than database • Interface features important • Avoided proprietary solutions (MS, CFM) Database Record Our System Interface Design Process • Visual considerations • Design choices • User testing Resorting Options Use of Icons Other Technical Issues • Javascript • Frames • Navigation Feedback • User testing – Some design choices validated • Discipline-based browsing • “Clean” design – Persistent problems • Meaning of “search” in this context • Information overload More Feedback • Library Domain Experts – Liked • The “elegance in simplicity” • Sorting bar – Concerns • Technical issues (frames) • Library organizational issues (special constituencies) • Sorting bar Lessons • Users don’t work the way system designers want them to! • Testing & evaluation a must – adjust assumptions, throw away stuff • Benefits of coordinated efforts Conclusions • Library information systems: a challenging area! • Browse better than search, even with rich indexing, search does not seem promising • Simpler can be better (careful selection) • Potential area for research: guided paths for different types of users • Next stage: “My Library”?