Frameworks and Principles

Behind Moral Disposition.

Ethical issues/experiences from real-world situations
 Normative Ethics
Normative ethics involves at arriving at moral standards that regulate right and wrong
conduct. in a sense it is a search for an ideal litmus test of proper behavior. it is also called
perspective ethics. it is a study of ethical theories that prescribe how people ought to act. it
examine the standards for the rightness or wrongness of actions. normative ethics suggest
punishment when a person deviates from the path of ideals. it provides justifications for
punishing a person who disturbs social or moral order. It tries to establish certain theories on
the guidelines of some norms. normative ethics offer the moral principles to use to resolve
difficult moral decisions
 Ethical
issues/experience
s from real-world
situations
 Cheating
It has been argued that cheating may be tolerated if the student did not
intend to cheat, perhaps because of a failure to understand the normal rules
or expected procedures. We also argue that student collaboration in graded
work constitutes cheating even if the instructor condones such
collaboration. In a similar vein, we address the view that student copying
is cheating even if the instructor alters the rules to allow such copying.
This moral view can be applied to any cheating behavior, we argue. As a
specific example, we demonstrate how it can be applied to the pedagogical
recommendation that instructors should encourage their students to cheat
in order to cultivate student skills in the area of cyber security. We also
address the view that student cheating can be justified by situations in
which the student believes that he/she is being subjected to an unfair or
unethical overall learning environment.
 Bullying
Bullying is a serious problem in today's workplace, in that, a large percentage
of peoples have either been bullied or knows someone who has. There are a
variety of ethical concerns dealing with bullying-that is, courses of action to
manage the bullying contain serious ethical/legal concerns. A possible
limitation of this model is that it is designed to be normative (judgmental),
and while it does take into consideration the relationships among the
victim, the perpetrator, the groups in the organization, and the organization
itself in judging the ethics of bullying, it does not explicitly consider the
process by which bullying might develop and persist. We should not
tolerate this aspect because aside from this is morally wrong, but it might
destroy the life of someone that been bullied.
 Murder
Murder is considered a serious crime in our country. The loosely defined
term of murder implies that a person who kills another human being with
intent is known as being the worst kind of violent crime we see in our
society. Any unlawful killing requires that a living person be killed, and it
does not mean that the guilty person feels any hatred or spite in order to plan
and execute the act of murder. Moreover, the destructive acts that end
people's lives are classified as homicides which include manslaughter and
first- and second-degree murder. More important, the justice system has put
different labels on such crimes, but it also allows room for criminals to get
away with murder.
 Normative ethics tells you what is good and bad in general. A
normative ethical theory might, for instance, claim that the best
actions are those that issue from a virtuous disposition, that
maximize happiness or obey some abstract moral laws
ascertainable by reason alone. Such theories can be applied in all
sorts of situations in everyday life, for instance, when you’re
deciding whether to lie to someone or what charities to give your

Reflection money to. Inheriting good things from past is not bad. We human
beings we learn from surroundings, our nature is also with mixture
of good and bad. As long as we have the talent to choose what
suits us and does not, we must choose the one fits us.