Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Policy Objectives
1. To encourage and promote the use of trust receipts 2. To provide for the regulation of trust receipt transactions 3. To penalize violations as a criminal offense (Sec. 2)
It is a written or printed document signed by the entrustee in favor of the entruster containing terms and conditions substantially complying with the provisions of this Decree. (Sec. 3, cf. Sec. 4)
Any transaction by and between the entruster and the entrustee, whereby the entruster, who owns or holds absolute title or security interests over certain specified goods, documents or instruments, releases the same to the possession of the entrustee upon the latter's execution and delivery to the entruster of a trust receipt, or for other purposes substantially equivalent to those specified in Sec. 4
The device first came into general use in importing transactions, where goods were consigned directly to a bank which paid a draft for the price on the credit of the intended buyer who engaged to repay the banks advances
Over time, trust receipts have become indispensable contracts in international and domestic business transactions (People vs. Nitafan)
Importer
Antecedent acts in a trust receipt transaction: 1. Application and approval of letter of credit
(Reimbursement Agreement) 2. Making of marginal deposit 3. Effective importation of goods through the efforts of the importer (Colinares vs. CA)
Traditionally, there are 3 parties to a trust receipt transaction: 1. The importer/entrustee 2. The bank/entruster 3. The foreign seller
However, the Supreme Court has held that even a bipartite contract is covered by PD 115 (Robles vs. CA)
1. Loan feature usually represented by a Letter of Credit 2. Security feature the trust receipt proper (Vintola vs. IBAA)
Security Feature
A trust receipt is a security agreement pursuant to which the entruster acquires a security interest in the goods. Security interest, defined. It is property interest in goods, documents or instruments to secure performance of some obligations of the entrustee or of some third persons to the entruster and includes title, whether or not expressed to be absolute, whenever such title is in substance taken or retained for security only. (Sec. 3)
Security Feature
The security interest is similar to a lien on the goods because the entrusters advances will have to be settled first before the entrustee can consolidate his ownership over the goods. (Prudential Bank vs. NLRC)
The entrusters security interest is valid against all creditors for the duration of the trust receipt agreement (Sec. 12)
Security Feature
The title of the bank to the security is the one sought to be protected (by the law) and not the loan which is a separate and distinct agreement. (Prudential Bank vs. NLRC)
The entruster takes the full title to the goods at the very beginningas soon as goods are bought and paid by him. (Ibid.)
- The goods remain the importers property. Entrustee is factual owner. - The bank does not become real owner of the goods. It remains a lender and creditor. Entrusters ownership is merely legal fiction. (Abad vs. CA)
In a certain manner, a trust receipt partakes of the nature of a conditional sale as provided in the Chattel Mortgage Law, i.e., the importer becomes absolute owner of the imported merchandise as soon as he has paid its price. (Ibid.)
It is not a chattel mortgage because: - it does not require the formalities set forth in the Chattel Mortgage Law, such as the affidavit and oath (Secs. 3(j) and 5, cf. Sec. 5, Act 1508) - it does not have to be registered with the Register of Deeds (Sec. 3(j), cf. Sec. 198, Admin. Code)
It is not a conditional sale per se because: - the entruster is not a seller as contemplated by law. He does not take on the obligations and warranties of a seller (Sec. 8, cf. Arts. 1495-1581, Civil Code) - the transaction between the entruster and the entrustee is more akin to a credit transaction than a sale.
TR vs. Pledge
It is not a pledge because: - the entrustee/debtor is not the absolute owner of the goods (cf. Art. 2085) - the entrustee/debtor does not deliver the possession of the goods to the entruster/creditor (cf. Art. 2093)
TR vs. Consignment
It is different from consignment because the entrustee is the real owner of the goods and not a mere dealer/agent
Note: But if the consignment is evidenced by a delivery trust receipt, it will fall under the Trust Receipts Law (Robles vs. CA)
The entruster shall be entitled: - (a) to the proceeds of the sale of the goods, documents or instruments covered by a trust receipt to the extent of the amount owed to him; OR (b) to the return of such goods, docs, or instruments in case of non-sale - to enforce all other rights conferred to him in the trust receipt - to cancel the trust and take possession of the goods, etc. in case of default or breach of the terms of the trust receipt and to have these sold in a private or public auction (Sec. 7)
(1) To hold the goods, documents or instruments in trust for the entruster and shall dispose of them strictly in accordance with the terms and conditions of the trust receipt; (2) To receive the proceeds in trust for the entruster and turn over the same to the entruster to the extent of the amount owing to the entruster or as appears on the trust receipt; (3) To insure the goods for their total value against loss from fire, theft, pilferage or other casualties; (4) To keep said goods or proceeds thereof whether in money or whatever form, separate and capable of identification as property of the entruster;
(5) To return the goods, documents or instruments in the event of non-sale or upon demand of the entruster; and (6) To observe all other terms and conditions of the trust receipt not contrary to the provisions of the law. (Sec. 9)
Criminal Liability
Art. 315 Revised Penal Code 1. With unfaithfulness or abuse of confidence, namely: (b) By misappropriating or converting, to the prejudice of another, money, goods, or any other personal property received by the offender in trust or on commission, or for administration, or under any other obligation involving the duty to make delivery of or to return the same, even though such obligation be totally or partially guaranteed by a bond; or by denying having received such money, goods, or other property.