Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CH 9 The Analysis of Competitive Markets Summer 2022
CH 9 The Analysis of Competitive Markets Summer 2022
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall • Microeconomics • Pindyck/Rubinfeld, 8e. 1 of 28
MARKET EFFICIENCY
Efficiency is the property of a resource allocation of maximizing the total surplus [= consumer surplus (CS) and producer surplus (PS)] received by all members of society.
In addition to market efficiency, a social planner might also care about equity – the fairness of the distribution of well-being among the various buyers and sellers.
Chapter 9: The Analysis of Competitive Markets
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall • Microeconomics • Pindyck/Rubinfeld, 8e. 2 of 28
CS and PS
Chapter 9: The Analysis of Competitive Markets
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall • Microeconomics • Pindyck/Rubinfeld, 8e. 3 of 28
Consumer and Producer Surplus in the Market
Equilibrium
•Price •A
•D
•Supply
Chapter 9: The Analysis of Competitive Markets
•Consumer
•surplus
•Equilibrium •E
•Price
•Producer
•surplus
•Demand
•B
•C
•0 •Equilibrium •Quantity
•quantity
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall • Microeconomics • Pindyck/Rubinfeld, 8e. 4 of 28
•Copyright©2003 Southwestern/Thomson Learning
9.1 EVALUATING THE GAINS AND LOSSES
FROM GOVERNMENT POLICIES—
CONSUMER AND PRODUCER SURPLUS
Review of Consumer and Producer Surplus
Figure 9.1
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall • Microeconomics • Pindyck/Rubinfeld, 8e. 5 of 28
9.1 EVALUATING THE GAINS AND LOSSES
FROM GOVERNMENT POLICIES—
CONSUMER AND PRODUCER SURPLUS
Review of Consumer and Producer Surplus
Figure 9.1
Consumer and Producer Surplus
Chapter 9: The Analysis of Competitive Markets
(continued)
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall • Microeconomics • Pindyck/Rubinfeld, 8e. 6 of 28
Efficiency in the market equilibrium
surplus.
•Market failure Situation in which an
unregulated competitive market is
inefficient because prices fail to provide
proper signals to consumers and
producers.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall • Microeconomics • Pindyck/Rubinfeld, 8e. 7 of 28
Evaluating the impacts of government
intervention
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall • Microeconomics • Pindyck/Rubinfeld, 8e. 8 of 28
9.1 EVALUATING THE GAINS AND LOSSES
FROM GOVERNMENT POLICIES—
CONSUMER AND PRODUCER SURPLUS
Application of Consumer and Producer Surplus
● welfare effects Gains and losses to consumers and
producers.
Chapter 9: The Analysis of Competitive Markets
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall • Microeconomics • Pindyck/Rubinfeld, 8e. 9 of 28
DEFINE; GRAPH; EXPLANATION, DECISION
Change of Consumer Surplus = A – B Change of Producer surplus = -A - C
=-B-C
= DEAD WEIGHT LOSS= DWL
= NET SUFFERINGs/LOSS OF THE SOCIETY
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall • Microeconomics • Pindyck/Rubinfeld, 8e. 10 of 28
9.2 THE EFFICIENCY OF A COMPETITIVE MARKET
Figure 9.5
Welfare Loss When Price is Held Above
Market-Clearing Level [ Floor Price]
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall • Microeconomics • Pindyck/Rubinfeld, 8e. 11 of 28
Floor Price: Minimum price buyers need to
pay
Change of CS = -A – B Change of Producer surplus = A -C
Change of welfare = Change of CS +
Change of PS
= -A – B +A- C
Chapter 9: The Analysis of Competitive Markets
= - B –C
= DEAD WEIGHT LOSS [ Net loss of
the society due to government’s
regulation of the price]
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall • Microeconomics • Pindyck/Rubinfeld, 8e. 12 of 28
PRICE CEILING: MATHEMATICAL
IMPLICATION . SEE. PAGE 326, FIGURE
Supply and demand equations for government housing are
given below.
Supply: QS = 16,000 + 0.4P
Demand: QD = 32,000 - 0.4P
Now assume that, government has set a price ceiling of
15000 Taka by considering the social need of the
product/service. What will be the impacts of this
intervention. Do you support this type of intervention by
government? Why or why not?
SUPPLY: QS = 16,000 + 0.4P
DEMAND: QD = 32,000 - 0.4P
D=S
32000 -0.4p = 16000+ 0.4p
P = Taka 20,000
D = 32000 -0.4P = 32000- 0.4*20,000 = 24000
S = 16000+0.4P = 16000+0.4*20000 = 24000.
Draw figure
Now intervention with ceiling price (maximum price) = Taka 15,000
QD = 32000- 0.4P = 32000 -0.4*15000 = 26,000
Qs = 16000+ 0.4P = 16000+ 0.4*15000 = 22000
Shortage = 4000
Find Dead weight loss: see text book, P. 326 for drawing
SUPPLY: QS = 16,000 + 0.4P
DEMAND: QD = 32,000 - 0.4P
How to draw figure?
For demand curve: P = 0; Qd = 32000; Qd = 0
0 = 32000 - 0.4P
P = 80000
How to draw supply curve?
P = 0; Qs = 16000; Qs = 0
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall • Microeconomics • Pindyck/Rubinfeld, 8e. 18 of 28
9.4 PRICE SUPPORTS AND PRODUCTION QUOTAS
Price Supports
● Price support Price set by government above free market level and
maintained by governmental purchases of excess supply.
Prince Supports
Chapter 9: The Analysis of Competitive Markets
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall • Microeconomics • Pindyck/Rubinfeld, 8e. 19 of 28
How to calculate DWL
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall • Microeconomics • Pindyck/Rubinfeld, 8e. 20 of 28
PRICE SUPPORT: MATHEMATICAL
EXAMPLE
1981 Supply of rice: QS = 1800 + 240P
1981 Demand for rice: QD = 3550 - 266P
= D – (Q2 –Q1)Ps
9.4 PRICE SUPPORTS AND PRODUCTION QUOTAS
Price Quotas
Figure 9.11
Supply Restrictions
To maintain a price Ps above the
market-clearing price P0, the
Chapter 9: The Analysis of Competitive Markets
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall • Microeconomics • Pindyck/Rubinfeld, 8e. 24 of 28
Assume that supply restriction is 16000 units
Change of CS = A –B
Change of PS = -A –C
See. Page 326 D = 16000 = 32000- 0.4P ; P = Taka 40.000
Chapter 9: The Analysis of Competitive Markets
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall • Microeconomics • Pindyck/Rubinfeld, 8e. 25 of 28
9.5 IMPORT QUOTAS AND TARIFFS
● import quota Limit on the quantity of a good that can be
imported.
● tariff Tax on an imported good.
Figure 9.14
Chapter 9: The Analysis of Competitive Markets
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall • Microeconomics • Pindyck/Rubinfeld, 8e. 26 of 28
9.5 IMPORT QUOTAS AND TARIFFS
Figure 9.15
to P*.
This can be achieved by a quota, or
by a tariff T = P* − Pw.
Trapezoid A is again the gain to
domestic producers.
The loss to consumers is A + B + C
+ D.
If a tariff is used, the government
gains D, the revenue from the tariff.
The net domestic loss is B + C.
[ = -A-B-C-D+A +D = -B- C]
If a quota is used instead,
rectangle D becomes part of the
profits of foreign producers, and
the net domestic loss is B + C + D.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall • Microeconomics • Pindyck/Rubinfeld, 8e. 27 of 28
Tariff:
Import Quota:
-A-B-C-D +A +D
= -B-C = -B –C -D
Chapter 9: The Analysis of Competitive Markets
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall • Microeconomics • Pindyck/Rubinfeld, 8e. 28 of 28
Find the DWL under Tariff and Import Quota. P.
353, Ex6. [ A = ½(8+6)*(12 -9) = 21
World Market Price = $9, Tariff = $3 Per unit of import
Chapter 9: The Analysis of Competitive Markets
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall • Microeconomics • Pindyck/Rubinfeld, 8e. 29 of 28
TARIFF VS IMPORT QUOTA: WHICH ONE IS GOOD FOR A HOME
COUNTRY? Ex. 5, Page 353. D = 40- 2P; S =2P/3
TARIFF:
IMPORT QUOTA
Change of CS = -A-B-C-D
Change of PS = A
Govt. revenue (tariff) = C
Welfare Loss
= -A-B-C-D+A +C
= -B –D
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall • Microeconomics • Pindyck/Rubinfeld, 8e. 30 of 28
7. Suppose the government wants to limit imports of a certain good. Is it preferable to use
Changes in domestic consumer and producer surpluses are the same under import quotas and
Chapter 9: The Analysis of Competitive Markets
tariffs. There will be a loss in (domestic) total surplus in either case. However, with a tariff, the
government can collect revenue equal to the tariff times the quantity of imports and these revenues
can be redistributed in the domestic economy to offset the domestic deadweight loss by, for
example, reducing taxes. Thus, there is less of a loss to the domestic society as a whole. With the
import quota, foreign producers can capture the difference between the domestic and world price
times the quantity of imports. Therefore, with an import quota, there is a loss to the domestic
society as a whole. If the national government is trying to increase welfare, it should use a tariff.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall • Microeconomics • Pindyck/Rubinfeld, 8e. 31 of 28
IMPACT OF TAX
Who really pays these
taxes?
Income tax (Direct tax) -
deducted from your pay,
GST (Indirect tax) - added
to the price of most things
you buy
Direct tax reduces the buying
power of the individuals and
thus shifts the demand curve
to the left.
INCIDENCE OF INDIRECT
TAX
Figure shows the effects of this tax.
With no tax: Equil. price = $3.00 a packet
With tax on sellers of $1.50 a packet
Indirect tax amount equals the vertical
distance between two supply curves
The market price paid by buyers rises to $4.00
a packet and the quantity bought decreases.
The price received by the sellers falls to $2.50
a packet.
Let’s see the change in consumer and
producer surplus ,Govt. Revenue, and DWL;
Change of CS = -100 (=1*100) -12.5 [ = -
1*100 – ½*25*1 = -112.5]
Change of PS
= -100*0.5 – 1/2*0.50*25 [ = -0.5*100-
1/2*25*0.5]
GOVT. REVENUE = Taka1.5*100 = Taka
150
INCIDENCE OF INDIRECT TAX [ P.347=
FOR SUBSIDY
Ps – Pb = Subsidy = s
[ here Pb is price buyers pay, Ps = Price supplier receive]
Incidence of a Tax
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall • Microeconomics • Pindyck/Rubinfeld, 8e. 36 of 28
INEFFICIENCY CREATED BY INDIRECT
TAX
Tax revenue takes part of the total surplus.
The decreased quantity creates a deadweight loss
MATHEMATICAL EXAMPLE ON INDIRECT
TAX
Demand equation is Q = 9 –P
Supply equation is Q = -1 + P
Government has imposed an indirect tax of 2 Taka on the product. Find the new equilibrium, change in
consumer and producer surplus and amount of government revenue and DWL.
First convert the Supply equation to: Ps =1 + Q
And Demand equation to: Pb = 9 -Q .
Without Tax d = s
9 –P = -1 + P
-2P = -10 ; P = Taka 5, Qd = 9 –P = 4; Qs = -1+P = 4
With Tax:
Pb – Ps = TAX = 2
9 – Q – 1 –Q= 2; -2Q = - 6 ; Q = 3 ; Pb = 9 -Q = 9- 3 = Taka 6;
Ps =1 + Q = 1+3 = 4
Govt. revenue = 3*Taka 2 = Taka 6
EXERCISE 2.
IF TAKA 1 SUBSIDY IS GIVEN
Ps – Pb = Subsidy = 1
Q- 4 – 10+Q = 1
2q -14 = 1
2Q = 15; Q = 7.5
Pb = 10 –Q = 10 -7.5 = Taka 2.5
Ps = Q- 4 = 7.5 – 4 = Taka 3.5