Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Education Projects
Concepts and Applications in
Bank Work
Foundational Training
December, 1998
Training Program Elements
Hands-on Modules
February 24 “Incorporating Indigenous Peoples and Other
Cultural Minorities in Human Development Project
Design: A Joint Technical Workshop”
February 25 “Girls Education: Foundations for Sound
Analysis”
April 6 “Student Loans”
May 12 “Impact Evaluation of Education Projects”
Lectures/Seminars
December 18 “Market Forces and Education,” Nicholas Barr,
London School of Economics
Nicholas Burnett
AFTH2
Objectives of Foundational
Training
Policy Context
Good 12
Acceptable 21
Marginal 13
Poor 31
Comparison between ECON II, ECON III and
ECON IV A of Projects in the Social Sectors
Overall Ranking
60%
ECON II
50% ECON III
ECON IVA
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Good (1) Acceptable (2) Marginal (3) Poor (4)
Overall Ranking of Projects in the Education
Sector has Improved
60% ECON II
ECON III
50%
ECON IV
40% FY98 Projects
30%
20%
10%
0%
Good (1) Acceptable (2) Marginal (3) Poor (4)
Probability of obtaining an unsatisfactory or
highly unsatisfactory rating as a function of
the quality of the economic analysis
(development objective rating)
Good 5 2 0
Acceptable 9 5 5
Marginal 18 14 16
Poor 33 33 30
6. Institutional analysis
7. Poverty impact analysis
8. Environmental assessment
9. Performance Criteria
- For M & E
10. Overall project justification
Economic Analysis in Education
Changing Norms
Economic analysis in the Bank in general
Economic analysis in education sector
Education lending
Changing Bank Norms
(Education)
“Not applicable”
- poor outcome specification
- rare to find unit costs or alternatives
- SAR Reviews: 1993, 1995, 1996,1997, 1998
Change is happening
- “Priorities and Strategies for Education”
- “Getting Results in the Social Sectors”
- Recent SARs/PADs
- Education Sector Strategy Paper
Education Projects - Rating by Criteria
SAR Review 1993
Criteria 1 2 3 4 Total
Overall Rating 8 12 6 1 27
Linkage to ESW 10 0 0 17 27
Alternatives considered 1 0 0 26 27
Fiscal analysis & cost recovery 8 11 2 6 27
Clarity of price and
9 10 8 0 27
quantity assumptions
Institutional analysis 7 14 6 0 27
Poverty analysis 13 7 3 4 27
Testing for learning performance 7 0 0 20 27
Midterm review 24 0 0 3 27
Education Projects - Rating by Criteria
PAD Review 1998
Criteria 1 2 3 4 Total
Overall Rating 14 20 2 1 37
Linkage to ESW 33 2 1 1 37
Quantitative analysis 14 18 5 0 37
of alternatives considered
Fiscal analysis & cost recovery 25 7 3 2 37
Clarity of price and 7 16 14 0 37
quantity assumptions
Institutional analysis 12 21 3 1 37
Beneficiary assessment 23 11 3 0 37
and poverty analysis
Testing for learning performance 17 5 10 0 32
DEVELOPMENT IN PRACTICE
Priorities and Strategies
for Education
A World Bank Review
Economic Analysis of Education Projects
30
20
10
0
FY97 FY98
Economic Analysis in Education
Changing Norms
Economic analysis in the Bank in general
Economic analysis in education sector
Education lending
Overall Lending for Education
40
30
20
10
0
1963-69 1975-79 1985-89 1995-98
1970-74 1980-84 1990-94
Key Topics
Cost and benefit identification
Coherently set in ESW
Public and private
Fiscal impact analysis
Outcome indicators
Project design alternatives
Cost and Benefit Identification
Do at both sector and project level
Costs relatively easy Benefits harder
Public costs Direct quantifiable
- capital - productivity
- recurrent - learning
Private costs External, hard to
- direct quantify
- indirect - spillover effects
- fertility
- health
Comparison of Costs and Benefits
Private Social
Economic Analysis in Education
Key Topics
Cost and benefit identification
Coherently set in ESW
Public and private
Fiscal impact analysis
Outcome indicators
Project design alternatives
Coherently set in ESW
Importance of ESW
Education and other sectors
Resource misallocation within education
- Across subsectors
- Within subsectors
- For quality
Inequitable public spending
- Poverty incidence
- Gender incidence
Importance of ESW
% Unsatisfactory
Average (Social Sector
Policy Distortions ERR Projects)
Trade Restrictions
Highly restrictive 13 28
Nonrestrictive 19 0
Exchange Rate
8 37
Highly overvalued 18 17
Slightly overvalued
Real Interest Rate
15 29
Negative 17 18
Positive
Fiscal Deficit 13 29
High 18 11
Low
Price Distortions of Tradables
High distortions 16 26
Low distortions 17 15
100%
100
89
80%
77 79
60% 66
40%
20%
0%
0 1 2 3 4 or
more
Number of ESW Reports in Country/Sector in 3 years Preceding Project
Source: Schneider, “Economic Sector Work and Results on the Ground.”
ESW in Education over Time
Staff Time Charged to Education Sector
and Project Work
1989
1998
ESW Lending ESW
10% Lending
17% Preparation
Preparation
53%
41%
Supervision
30% Supervision
49%
ESW in Education over Time
Ratio of No. of ESW Reports Produced / No. of
Projects Approved
GER 80
Jordan
70 Ecuador Syrian Arab Egypt
Philippines Republic Tunisia
60 El Salvador Bolivia
Jamaica
Paraguay Cameroon Honduras
50 Colombia
Thailand
40 Guatemala
Morocco
30 Senegal
20 Mauritania
10
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Nigeria
400 Indonesia
Venezuela
350
5 10 15 20 25
Unit Cost (% per capita GNP)
Inequitable Public Spending
Subsidies for Education in Indonesia, 1989
100 Primary
subsidy
80 Junior
secondary
subsidy
60 Senior
secondary
ge of expenditure or subsidy subsidy
Tertiary
40 subsidy
All education
20 subsidy
Income/expen
0 diture
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Percentage of population
Public Spending on Education
Gender Incidence of Public Spending on Education in Cote d’Ivoire
100
primf
80 primm
secf
60 secm
expenditure on education terf
40 term
allf
20 allm
45 degree
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
Percent of population by income group
Economic Analysis in Education
Key Topics
Cost and benefit identification
Coherently set in ESW
Public and private
Fiscal impact analysis
Outcome indicators
Project design alternatives
Public and Private
Key Topics
Cost and benefit identification
Coherently set in ESW
Public and private
Fiscal impact analysis
Outcome indicators
Project design alternatives
Fiscal impact analysis
Key Topics
Cost and benefit identification
Coherently set in ESW
Public and private
Fiscal impact analysis
Outcome indicators
Project design alternatives
Project Design Alternatives