Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Paper A Sovereignty
Paper A Sovereignty
Theory
TWO ASPECTS OF SOVEREIGNTY
INTERNAL SOVEREIGNTY
EXTERNAL SOVEREIGNTY
CHARACTERISTICS OF
SOVEREIGNTY
Originality
Permanence
Absoluteness
Exclusiveness
Universality
Inalienability
Indivisibility
Unity
Imperscriptibility
DIFFERENT KINDS OR FORMS OF
SOVEREIGNTY
1. NOMINAL OF TITULAR
SOVEREIGNTY AND REAL
SOVEREIGNTY
2. DE-JURE AND DE-FACTO
SOVEREIGN
3. LEGAL SOVEREIGNTY
4. POLITICAL SOVEREIGNTY
5. POPULAR SOVEREIGNTY
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN
POLITICAL AND POPULAR
SOVEREIGNTY
It is vague concept
Popular sovereignty is not organised
Lack of legal sanction behind it
Absence of legitimate coercive power
with people
THEORY OF LIMITED
SOVEREIGNTY
Natural Rights
Natural Laws
Religion
Constitution
Customs and Convention
International law and Treaties
Public Opinion
Limitations put by different Associations
CHARACTERISTICS OF
AUSTIN’S THEORY OF
SOVEREIGNTY
Sovereignty is an essential element of the State
Sovereignty in the state must be Determinate
Receives habitual obedience from the bulk of
Society
Sovereignty is Unlimited
Sovereign is the only source of Law
Sovereignty id Indivisible
CRITICISM OF AUSTIN’S
THEORY
o Sovereignty is not always Determinate
o Sovereignty is Divisible
o Power of the sovereign are not Unlimited
o Laws are not always the command of the
Sovereign
o Laws are obeyed because of their Utility
o Hindrance in the way of international co-
operation
o It is against democratic Principles
o Austin ignores Political Sovereignty
o It is dangerous Theory
o This theory is against the principle of
Equality
o Criticism of this theory by pluralists
IMPORTANCE OF AUSTIN’S
THEORY OF SOVEREIGNTY