Financial Management:: Financial Analysis - Sizing Up Firm Performance

Financial Management:
Principles & Applications

Thirteenth Edition
Chapter 4
Financial Analysis—
Sizing up Firm
Performance
Copyright © 2018, 2014, 2011 Pearson

CopyrightEducation, Inc. All
© 2018, 2014, 2011 Pearson Rights
Education, Inc. All Reserved
Rights Reserved
Learning Objectives (1 of 2)
1. Explain what we can learn by analyzing a firm’s
financial statements.
2. Use common size financial statements as a tool
of financial analysis.
3. Calculate and use a comprehensive set of
financial ratios to evaluate a company’s
performance.
Copyright © 2018, 2014, 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Learning Objectives (2 of 2)
4. Select an appropriate benchmark for use in
performing a financial ratio analysis.
5. Describe the limitations of financial ratio
analysis.
Principles Used in this Chapter
• Principle 3: Cash Flows Are the Source of Value.
• Principle 4: Market Prices Reflect Information.
• Principle 5: Individuals Respond to Incentives.
4.1 WHY DO WE ANALYZE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS?
Why Do We Analyze Financial
Statements? Internal Financial Analysis
• An internal financial analysis might be done:
– To evaluate the performance of employees
– To compare the performance of firm’s different divisions
– To prepare financial projections
– To evaluate the firm’s financial performance in light of
its competitors’ performance
Why Do We Analyze Financial
Statements? External Financial Analysis
• External financial analysis to determine the credit
worthiness or investment attractiveness is done
by:
– Banks and other lenders
– Suppliers
– Credit-rating agencies
– Professional analysts
– Individual investors
4.2 COMMON SIZE STATEMENTS:
STANDARDIZING FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
Common Size Statements: Standardizing
Financial Information
• A common size financial statement is a
standardized version of a financial statement in
which all entries are presented in percentages.
• It helps to compare a firm’s financial statements
with those of other firms, even if the other firms
are not of equal size.
Preparing Common Size Statements
• How to prepare a common size financial
statement?
– For a common size income statement, divide each
entry in the income statement by sales.
– For a common size balance sheet, divide each entry
in the balance sheet by total assets.
Table 4.1 H. J. Boswell, Inc.
Common-Size Income Statement for the Year Ended
December 31, 2016
Sales Blank 100.0%
Cost of goods sold Blank −75.0%
Gross profits Blank 25.0%
Operating expenses: Blank Blank
Selling expenses −3.3% Blank
General and administrative expense −2.5% Blank
Depreciation and amortization expense −5.0% Blank
Total operating expense Blank −10.8%
Net operating income (EBIT, or earnings before interest and taxes) Blank 14.2%
Interest expense Blank −2.5%
Earnings before taxes Blank 11.7%
Income taxes Blank −4.1%
Net income Blank 7.6%
Table 4.1 Observations
• Table 4.1 created by dividing each entry in the
income statement of Table 3.1 by firm sales for
2016.
– Cost of goods sold make up 75% of the firm’s sales
resulting in a gross profit of 25%.
– Selling expenses account for about 3% of sales.
– Income taxes account for 4.1% of the firm’s sales.
– After all expenses, the firm generates net income of
7.6% of firm’s sales.
Table 4.2 H. J. Boswell, Inc. (1 of 2)
Common-Size Balance Sheets, December 31, 2015 and
2016
Blank 2015 2016 Change
Cash 5.4% 4.6% −0.8%
Accounts receivable 7.9% 8.2% 0.3%
Inventory 13.0% 19.2% 6.2%
Other current assets 0.8% 0.7% −0.1%
Total current assets 27.0% 32.6% 5.6%
Gross plant and equipment 94.6% 93.6% −1.0%
Less accumulated depreciation −21.7% −26.3% −4.6%
Net plant and equipment 73.0% 67.4% −5.6%
Total assets 100.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Table 4.2 H. J. Boswell, Inc. (2 of 2)
Blank 2015 2016 Change
Accounts payable 10.5% 9.6% −0.9%
Accrued expenses 2.6% 2.3% −0.3%
Short-term notes 3.6% 2.7% −0.8%
Total current liabilities 16.6% 14.6% −2.0%
Long-term debt 40.8% 39.2% −1.7%
Total liabilities 57.4% 53.8% −3.6%
Common stockholders’ equity Blank Blank Blank
Common stock—par value 2.6% 2.3% −0.3%
Paid-in capital 18.4% 16.4% −1.9%
Retained earnings 21.7% 27.5% 5.8%
Total common stockholders’ equity 42.6% 46.2% 3.6%
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity 100.0% 100.0% 0.0%
Table 4.2 Observations
• Table 4.2 created by dividing each entry in the
balance sheet of Table 3.2 (in chapter 3) by total
assets.
– Total current assets increased by 5.6% in 2016 while
total current liabilities declined by 2%.
– Long-term debt account for 39.2% of firm’s assets,
showing a decline of 1.7%.
– Retained earnings increased by 5.8%.
4.3 USING FINANCIAL RATIOS
Using Financial Ratios (1 of 2)
• Financial ratios provide a second method for
standardizing the financial information on the
income statement and balance sheet.
• A ratio by itself may have no meaning. Hence, a
given ratio is generally compared to: (a) ratios
from previous years; or (b) ratios of other firms in
the same industry.
Using Financial Ratios (2 of 2)
Question Category of Ratios Used to
Address the
Question
1. How liquid is the firm? Will it be able to pay its bills as they Liquidity ratios
come due?
2. How has the firm financed the purchase of its assets? Capital structure ratios
3. How efficient has the firm’s management Asset management efficiency ratios
been in utilizing its assets to generate sales?
4. Has the firm earned adequate returns on Profitability ratios

its investments?
5. Are the firm’s managers creating value for Market value ratios
shareholders?
LIQUIDITY RATIOS
Liquidity Ratios
• Liquidity ratios address a basic question: How
liquid is the firm?
• A firm is financially liquid if it is able to pay its bills
on time. We can analyze a firm’s liquidity from two
complementary perspectives:
– measuring overall liquidity of a firm, and
– measuring the liquidity of individual asset categories.
Measuring the Overall Liquidity of a Firm
The Overall liquidity is analyzed by comparing the
firm’s current assets to the firm’s current liabilities.
Two ratios used to analyze overall liquidity are:
1. Current Ratio
2. Acid-Test (or Quick) Ratio
Current Ratio (1 of 2)
• Current Ratio: Current Ratio compares a firm’s
current (liquid) assets to its current (short-term)
liabilities.
Current Ratio (2 of 2)
• What is the current ratio for 2016 for Boswell?
Current Ratio = $643.5m ÷ $288.0m = 2.23 times
• The firm had $2.23 in current assets for every $1 it
owed in current liability. It is better than peer group
average of $1.80.
Acid—Test (Quick) Ratio (1 of 2)
• Acid-Test (Quick) Ratio excludes the inventory
from current assets as inventory may not be very
liquid.
Acid—Test (Quick) Ratio (2 of 2)
• What is the quick ratio for Boswell?
• Acid Test (or Quick) Ratio
= ($643.5m−$378m) ÷ ($288.0m) = 0.92 times
• The firm has only $0.92 in current assets (less
inventory) to cover $1 in current liabilities. This
ratio is worse than peer average of $0.94
Measuring the Liquidity of Individual
Asset Categories
• We can also measure the liquidity of the firm by
examining the liquidity of accounts receivable
and inventories to see how long it takes the firm
to convert its accounts receivables and inventories
into cash.
Average Collection Period (1 of 2)
Average Collection Period measures the number
of days it takes the firm to collects its receivables.
Average Collection Period (2 of 2)
• What is the average collection period for Boswell,
Inc. for 2016?
• Daily Credit Sales
= $2,700m ÷ 365 days = $7.40 million
• Average Collection Period
= $162m ÷ $7.40 = 21.9 days
Accounts Receivable Turnover Ratio (1 of 2)
Accounts Receivable Turnover Ratio measures
how many times receivables are “rolled over” during
a year.
Accounts Receivable Turnover Ratio (2 of 2)
• What is the accounts receivable turnover ratio for
Boswell, Inc. for 2016?
• Accounts Receivable Turnover
= $2,700 million ÷ $162million = 16.67 times
– The firm’s accounts receivable were turning over at
16.67 times per year. This is higher than peer group
average of 14.60 times.
Inventory Turnover Ratio (1 of 2)
Inventory turnover ratio measures how many
times the company turns over its inventory during
the year. Shorter inventory cycles lead to greater
liquidity because the items in inventory are
converted to cash more quickly.
Inventory Turnover Ratio (2 of 2)
• What is the inventory turnover ratio for H. J.
Boswell, Inc.?
• Inventory Turnover Ratio
= $2,025m ÷ $378m = 5.36 times
– The firm turned over its inventory 5.36 times per year.
This ratio is slower than peer group average of 7.0
times.
Days’ Sales in Inventory
• Days’ Sales in Inventory
= 365÷ inventory turnover ratio
= 365 ÷ 5.36 = 68 days
• The firm, on average, holds it inventory for about
68 days.
Can a Firm Have Too Much Liquidity?
• A high investment in liquid assets will enable the
firm to repay its current liabilities in a timely
manner.
• However, an excessive investments in liquid
assets can prove to be costly as liquid assets
(such as cash) generate minimal return.
CHECKPOINT 4.1: CHECK YOURSELF
Evaluating Hewlett Packard’s Liquidity
If HP’s management were able to increase its inventory turnover ratio to 30 times a
year while holding firm sales constant, how much this reduce the firm’s investment in
inventory?
Step 1: Picture the Problem
• The inventory turnover ratio will measure how
many days items remain in inventory before being
sold. Inventory turnover ratio is important as it has
implications for cash flows and profitability of a
firm.
• Changes in inventory turnover ratio will impact the
firm’s investment in inventory.
Step 2: Decide on a Solution Strategy
• We will use the Inventory Turnover (IT) ratio to
compute the investment in inventory.
IT ratio = Cost of Goods Sold ÷ Inventories
We are given the inventories and IT ratio.
Step 3: Solve
• Inventory Turnover Ratio for HP
= $78,596m ÷ Inventory = 30
• Solving for the revised inventory level we get
$78,596 million /30 = $2,619.87 million.
Step 4: Analyze
• Reducing the firm’s inventory turnover ratio has a
major impact on the level of investment in
inventory. With inventory turnover ratio of 30,
investment in inventory drops significantly from
$4,288 million to $2,619.87 million.
CAPITAL STRUCTURE RATIOS
Capital Structure Ratios
Capital structure refers to the way a firm finances
its assets using a combination of debt and equity.
Capital structure ratios address the important
question: How has the firm financed the purchase of
its assets? To address this issue, we use two types
of capital structure ratios: the debt ratio, and the
times interest earned ratio.
Debt Ratio (1 of 2)
Debt ratio measures the proportion of the firm’s
assets that were financed using current plus long-
term liabilities.
Debt Ratio (2 of 2)
• What is the debt ratio for H.J. Boswell, Inc.?
• Debt Ratio
= $1,059.75 million ÷ $1,971 million = 53.80%
– The firm financed 53.80% of its assets with debt. This
ratio is significantly higher than the peer group average
of 35%.
Times Interest Earned Ratio (1 of 2)
Times Interest Earned Ratio measures the ability
of the firm to service its debt or repay the interest on
debt.
Times Interest Earned Ratio (2 of 2)
• What is the times interest earned ratio for H.J.
Boswell, Inc. for 2016?
• Times Interest Earned
= $382.5m ÷ $67.5m = 5.67 times
– The firm can pay its interest expense 5.67 times or
interest used 1/5.67th or 17.7% of its operating income,
which means its operating earnings could shrink by
82.3% and it could still pay its interest expense.
Comparing the Financing Decisions of HD and LOWES
What would be Home Depot’s times interest earned ratio if interest payments
remained the same, but net operating income dropped by 80% to only $2.354 billion?
Similarly if Lowes’ net operating income dropped by 80%, what would its times interest
earned ratio be?
Step 1: Picture the Problem (1 of 2)
• Times interest earned ratio is an important ratio for
firms that use debt financing. It measures the
firm’s ability to service its debt.
• The ratio requires comparing net operating
income or EBIT with Interest expense. Both items
are found on the income statement.
Step 1: Picture the Problem (2 of 2)
Picture an Income Statement
– Sales EBIT
 Less: Cost of Good Sold

 Equals: Gross Profit
 Less: Operating Expenses
 Equals: Net Operating Income (EBIT)
 Less: Interest Expense Interest
 Equals: Earnings before Taxes Expense
 Less: Taxes
 Equals Net Income
• Here we are considering the impact of a drop in
operating income on the times interest earned
ratio of Home Depot and Lowes. We will use the
following ratio to measure the times interest
earned (TIE) ratio. Interest expense is assumed to
remain the same.
• TIE = EBIT ÷ Interest Expense
Step 3: Solve
• TIE (Home Depot)
= $2.354 billion ÷ $0.919 billion = 2.56 times
• TIE (Lowes)
= $0.509 billion ÷$1.873 billion = .271 times
Step 4: Analyze
• We observe that a drop in net operating income
leads to a significant drop in times interest earned
ratio for both the firms. Should creditors be
worried by this drop? The drop in earnings would
be bad for Home Depot but devastating for
Lowe’s.
ASSET MANAGEMENT EFFICIENCY RATIOS
Asset Management Efficiency Ratios
Asset management efficiency ratios measure a
firm’s effectiveness in utilizing its assets to generate
sales. These ratios are commonly referred to as
turnover ratios as they reflect the number of times
a particular asset account balance turns over during
the year.
Total Asset Turnover Ratio
• Total Asset Turnover Ratio represents the
amount of sales generated per dollar invested in
the firm’s assets.
Fixed Asset Turnover Ratio
• Fixed asset turnover ratio measures firm’s
efficiency in utilizing its fixed assets (such as
property, plant and equipment).
Asset Management Efficiency Ratios:
Summary
The following grid summarizes the efficiency of
Boswell’s management in utilizing its assets to
generate sales. Overall, the managers utilized the
firm’s total investment in assets efficiently.
Asset Utilization Efficiency Boswell Peer Group Assessment
Total asset turnover 1.37 1.15 Good
Fixed asset turnover 2.03 1.75 Good
Receivables turnover 16.67 14.60 Good
Inventory turnover 5.36 7.0 Poor
PROFITABILITY RATIOS
Profitability Ratios (1 of 2)
Profitability ratios address a very fundamental
question: Has the firm earned adequate returns on
its investments?
Profitability Ratios (2 of 2)
Two fundamental determinants of firm’s profitability
and returns on investments are the following:
• Cost Control – How well has the firm controlled
its costs relative to each dollar of firm sales?
• Efficiency of asset utilization – How effective is
the firm in using the assets to generate sales?
Cost Control: Is the Firm Earning
Reasonable Profit Margins?
Gross profit margin shows how well the firm’s
management controls its expenses to generate
profits.
Cost Control: Gross Profit Margin
What is the gross profit margin ratio for 2016 for H.
J. Boswell, Inc.?
• Gross Profit Margin
= $675 million ÷ $2,700 million = 25%
– The firm spent $0.75 for cost of goods sold and thus
$0.25 out of each dollar of sales went towards gross
profits.
Cost Control: Operating Profit Margin
Operating Profit Margin measures how much
profit is generated from each dollar of sales after
accounting for both costs of goods sold and
operating expenses. It also indicates how well the
firm is managing its income statement.
Cost Control: Net Profit Margin (1 of 2)
Net Profit Margin measures how much income is
generated from each dollar of sales after adjusting
for all expenses (including income taxes).
Cost Control: Net Profit Margin (2 of 2)
What is the net profit margin ratio for H. J. Boswell,
Inc.?
• Net Profit Margin
= $204.75 million ÷ $2,700 million = 7.6%
– The firm generated $0.076 for each dollar of sales after
paying all of the firm’s expenses, whereas the peer-
group firms earn $0.102.
Return on Invested Capital
Operating Return on Assets ratio is the summary
measure of operating profitability. It takes into
account both management’s success in controlling
expenses and its efficient use of assets.
Operating Return on Assets
What will be the operating return on assets ratio for
H. J. Boswell, Inc. ?
• Operating Return on Assets
= $382.5 million ÷$1,971 million = 19.4%
– The firm generated $0.194 of operating profits for every
$1 of its invested assets, which is higher than peer
group average of $0.178.
Decomposing the Operating Return on
Assets Ratio
Figure 4.1 Analyzing H. J. Boswell, Inc.’s Operating Return
on Assets (OROA) (1 of 2)
Panel A. Decomposing the Operating Return on

Assets Ratio
Blank Operating Return on Assets = Operating Profit Margin × Total Asset

Turnover
Equation = ×
H. J. Boswell 19.4% = 14.2% × 1.37
Peer Group 17.8% = 15.5% × 1.15
Figure 4.1 Analyzing H. J. Boswell, Inc.’s Operating Return
on Assets (OROA) (2 of 2)
Panel B. Analyzing the Determinants of the Total

Asset Turnover Ratio
Blank Accounts Receivable = Inventory Turnover × Fixed Asset Turnover

Turnover
Equation = ×
H. J. 16.67 = 5.8 × 2.03

Boswell
Peer 14.60 = 7.0 × 1.75
Group
Figure 4-1 Observations
• Firm’s OROA (operating return on assets) is
higher than that of its peers.
• Firm’s OPM (operating profit margin) is lower than
that of its peers.
• Firm’s TATO (total asset turnover ratio) is higher
than that of its peers.
Figure 4-1 Recommendations
1. Reduce costs - The firm must investigate the
cost of goods sold and operating expenses to
see if there are opportunities to reduce costs.
2. Reduce inventories -The firm must investigate if
it can reduce the size of its inventories.
Evaluating the Operating Return on Assets (OROA) for HD and LOW
If Home Depot were able to raise its total asset turnover ratio to 2.5 while maintaining
its current operating profit margin, what would happen to its operating return on
assets?
• The operating return on assets ratio for a firm is
determined by two factors: cost control and asset
utilization. Here the focus is on asset utilization.
We will analyze the impact on operating return on
assets of improvement on the total asset turnover
ratio by using the following equation:
• Operating Return on Assets (OROA)
= Total Asset Turnover × Operating Profit Margin
Step 3: Solve
• Operating Return on Assets (OROA)
= Total Asset Turnover × Operating Profit Margin
• Before = 2.08 × 13.3% = 27.67%
• Now = 2.5 × 13.3% = 33.25%
Step 4: Analyze
• An improvement in total asset turnover ratio has a
favorable impact on Home Depot’s operating
return on assets (OROA).
• If Home Depot wants to increase its OROA more,
it should focus on cost control that will help
improve the net operating profit.
Is the Firm Providing a Reasonable Return
on the Owner’s Investment? (1 of 2)
Return on Equity (ROE) ratio measures the
accounting return on the common stockholders’
investment.
Is the Firm Providing a Reasonable Return
on the Owner’s Investment? (2 of 2)
What is the ROE ratio for H. J. Boswell, Inc.?
• ROE = $204.75 million ÷ $911.25 million = 22.5%
– Thus the shareholders earned 22.5% on their
investments. This is higher than peer average of 18%
Using the DuPont Method for
Decomposing the ROE ratio (1 of 4)
• DuPont method analyzes the firm’s ROE by
decomposing it into three parts.
– ROE = Profitability × Efficiency × Equity Multiplier
• Equity multiplier captures the effect of the firm’s
use of debt financing on its return on equity. The
equity multiplier increases in value as the firm
uses more debt.
The following table shows why Boswell’s return on equity
was higher than its peers.
Blank Return on = Net Profit × Total Asset × Financial

Equity Margin Turnover Leverage
or Equity
Multiplier
Equation = × ×
H. J. 22.5% Blank 7.6% 1.37 Blank 2.16

Boswell,
Inc.
Peer- 18.0% Blank 10.2% 1.15 Blank 1.54
Group
Averages
Figure 4.2 Expanded DuPont Analysis for H. J. Boswell, Inc.
MARKET VALUE RATIOS
Market Value Ratios
Market value ratios address the question, how are
the firm’s shares valued in the stock market?
Price—Earnings Ratio
Price-Earnings (PE) Ratio indicates how much
investors have been willing to pay for $1 of reported
earnings.
Market—to—Book Ratio
Market-to-Book Ratio measures the relationship
between the market value and the accumulated
investment in the firm’s equity.
Comparing the Valuation of APPL to MSFT Using Market Value Ratios
What would be the price per share have to be for Apple to increase its PE ratio to that
of Microsoft’s if we assume Apple’s earnings remain the same as reported above?
Price-to-earnings (PE) ratio depends on earnings
per share and price per share, pictured as follows:
Price per share standardized by
EPS =
Net income ÷ number
Of shares outstanding
PE Ratio =
Price per share ÷
Earnings per share
We need to determine the price per share that will
make PE ratio of Apple (10.39) equal to the PE ratio
of Microsoft (35.09).
PE ratio = Price per share ÷ Earnings per share
==> 35.09 = ? ÷ 9.22
Price per share = 35.09 x 9.22 = $323.53
Step 3: Solve
From Step 2, note that the PE ratio of Microsoft is
35.09.
PE ratio = Price per share ÷ Earnings per share
==> 35.09 = ? ÷ 9.22
Price per share = 35.09 x 9.22 = $323.53
Step 4: Analyze
• PE ratio allows us to compare two stocks with
different prices by standardizing the stock prices
by earnings.
• Microsoft has a much higher PE ratio. To reach
the same PE valuation, the stock price of Apple
will have to increase from $95.76 to $323.53.
4.4 SELECTING A PERFORMANCE BENCHMARK
Selecting a Performance Benchmark
There are two types of benchmarks that are
commonly used to analyze a firm’s financial
performance by means of its financial statements:
• Trend Analysis – compares a firm’s financial
statements over time (time-series comparisons).
• Peer Group Comparisons – compares the subject
firm’s financial statements with “peer” firms.
Trend Analysis
Comparing a firm’s recent financial ratios with the
past financial ratios provides insight into whether
the firm is improving or deteriorating over time. This
type of financial analysis is referred to as trend
analysis.
Figure 4-3 A Time—Series (Trend) Analysis of the Inventory
Turnover Ratio: Home Depot Versus Lowe’s, 2001–2015
Peer—Firm Comparisons
A peer firm is simply one that the analyst believes
will provide a relevant benchmark for the analysis at
hand. Peer groups often consist of firms from the
same industry. Industry average financial ratios can
be obtained from a number of financial databases
(such as Compustat) and internet sources (such as
yahoo finance and google finance).
Figure 4-4 Financial Analysis of the Gap, Inc., 2016
Financial Ratios Gap, Inc. Industry Average
Price-earnings ratio 10.52 21.69
Market-to-book ratio 3.21 13.40
Gross margin 39.63% 36.98%
Net profit margin 5.82% 6.61%
Operating profit margin 9.65% 11.88%
Return on equity 36.15% 46.22%
Debt ratio 65.94% 39.39%
Current ratio 1.57 1.62
Total assets turnover ratio 2.11 1.87
Inventory turnover ratio 5.38 4.69
4.5 LIMITATIONS OF RATIO ANALYSIS
Limitations of Ratio Analysis (1 of 2)
1. Picking an industry benchmark can sometimes
be difficult.
2. Published peer-group or industry averages are
not always representative of the firm being
analyzed.
3. An industry average is not necessarily a
desirable target or norm.
Limitations of Ratio Analysis (2 of 2)
4. Accounting practices differ widely among firms.
5. Many firms experience seasonal changes in
their operations.
6. Financial ratios offer simply clues that can
suggest the need for further investigation.
7. The results of financial analysis are no better
than the quality of the financial statements.
Key Terms (1 of 4)
• Accounts receivable turnover ratio
• Acid-test (quick) ratio
• Average collection period
• Book value per share
• Capital structure
• Current ratio
• Days’ sales in inventory
Key Terms (2 of 4)
• Debt ratio
• DuPont method
• Equity Multiplier
• Earnings per share (EPS)
• Financial leverage
• Financial ratios
• Fixed asset turnover ratio
• Inventory turnover ratio
Key Terms (3 of 4)
• Liquidity ratios
• Market-to-book ratio
• Market value ratios
• Notes payable
• Operating return on assets (OROA)
• Price-earnings (PE) ratio
Key Terms (4 of 4)
• Return on equity
• Times interest earned
• Total asset turnover ratio (TATO)
• Trend analysis
Copyright

Financial Management:: Financial Analysis - Sizing Up Firm Performance

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Financial Management:: Financial Analysis - Sizing Up Firm Performance

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Financial Management:

Principles & Applications

Copyright © 2018, 2014, 2011 Pearson

Cash 5.4% 4.6% −0.8%

Accounts receivable 7.9% 8.2% 0.3%

Inventory 13.0% 19.2% 6.2%

Other current assets 0.8% 0.7% −0.1%

Total current assets 27.0% 32.6% 5.6%

Gross plant and equipment 94.6% 93.6% −1.0%

Less accumulated depreciation −21.7% −26.3% −4.6%

Net plant and equipment 73.0% 67.4% −5.6%

Total assets 100.0% 100.0% 0.0%

4. Has the firm earned adequate returns on Profitability ratios

 Less: Cost of Good Sold

Total asset turnover 1.37 1.15 Good

Fixed asset turnover 2.03 1.75 Good

Receivables turnover 16.67 14.60 Good

Inventory turnover 5.36 7.0 Poor

Panel A. Decomposing the Operating Return on

Blank Operating Return on Assets = Operating Profit Margin × Total Asset

H. J. Boswell 19.4% = 14.2% × 1.37

Peer Group 17.8% = 15.5% × 1.15

Panel B. Analyzing the Determinants of the Total

Blank Accounts Receivable = Inventory Turnover × Fixed Asset Turnover

H. J. 16.67 = 5.8 × 2.03

Blank Return on = Net Profit × Total Asset × Financial

H. J. 22.5% Blank 7.6% 1.37 Blank 2.16

Price per share standardized by

Financial Ratios Gap, Inc. Industry Average

Price-earnings ratio 10.52 21.69

Market-to-book ratio 3.21 13.40

Gross margin 39.63% 36.98%

Net profit margin 5.82% 6.61%

Operating profit margin 9.65% 11.88%

Return on equity 36.15% 46.22%

Debt ratio 65.94% 39.39%

Current ratio 1.57 1.62

Total assets turnover ratio 2.11 1.87

Inventory turnover ratio 5.38 4.69

You might also like