Professional Documents
Culture Documents
of Seller
-Hemanandhini
21BLB1095
Contents
1 Introduction
2 Rights of a Seller
3 Duties of a Seller
4 Conclusions
Introduction
“Seller”-The definition of "seller" in Section 2(13) includes not only the person who sells but also the
person who agreed to sell. Hence, even if the agreement for sale had not ripened into a completed sale,
the previous owner would still be the seller within the meaning of the Act.
“Rights”- Rights are legal, social, or ethical principles of freedom or entitlement; that is, rights are the
fundamental normative rules about what is allowed of people or owed to people according to some
legal system, social convention, or ethical theory.
“Duty”-A legal duty is an obligation, created by law or contract. A legal duty requires a person to
conform their actions to a particular standard. And it also carries with it a recognition that the law will
enforce this duty to the benefit of other individuals to whom this duty is owed.
Rights of a seller SA
L E
Rights to have
acceptance of
Right to take legal
goods
action
Right to Interest
Right to receive the
price of goods
Rights to have acceptance of goods
It is the right of the seller that goods delivered by a seller under a contract of sale
must be accepted by the buyer.
In Demby Hamilton & Co. v. Barden, the buyer who wrongfully refused to take delivery of apple juice,
was held liable for the deterioration of the same due to his not taking the delivery
If the buyer wrongfully refuses or neglects to accept and pay the unpaid seller, the seller can
sue the buyer for damages caused due to his non-acceptance of goods. Since the buyer
refused to buy the goods without any just cause, the seller may face certain damages.
In the case of Suresh Kumar Rajendra Kumar v K Assan Koya & sons the plaintiff sold the
goods to the buyer who afterwards rejected to accept and pay for the goods. Plaintiff in
orderly course of business sold the goods urgently at a lower price. The court held that the
buyer had to pay damages to the amount of difference between the price the rice was
supposed to be sold and the price it was finally sold. This case is the perfect example of the
seller utilizing the remedies available to him under section 54 and 56
Right to receive the price of goods
According to Section 32 ,
Unless and otherwise agreed, delivery of goods and payment of the price are concurrent condition
payment of the price are concurrent conditions, that is to say, the seller shall be ready and willing to
give possession of the goods to the buyer in exchange for the price and the buyer shall be ready and
willing to pay the price in exchange for possession of the goods
The parties may agree as to when the price is payable. The buyer is bound to accept the goods and pay
for them in accordance with the contract. If there is no contract to the contrary, the delivery of the
goods and the payment of the price are concurrent conditions,
Right to take legal action
Where under a contract of sale the property in the goods has passed
to the buyer and the buyer wrongfully neglects or refuses to pay for
the goods according to the terms of the contract, the seller may sue
him for the price of the goods.
Right to Interest R EST
IN TE
Seller is entitled to interest at a reasonable rate on the total unpaid price of goods
sold, from the time it was due and until it is actually paid to him.
Interest is to be paid on the amount of the price, from the date when the price was payable, at
such rate as the court thinks just. Thus, the Court may order interest on the price from the date
of tender of the goods if no date of payment of price has been decided, or from the date when
the price was payable.
Duties of a seller
Where it is necessary for the seller to do something with the goods in order to put
them into a deliverable state, he must do such thing to put the goods into a deliverable
state within a stipulated or reasonable time
Where the seller fails to deliver the goods to the buyer, he must pay back
the price of the goods to the buyer which he had received in advance.
When the consideration for the payment made has failed, the buyer can recover
back the price. Thus, if the seller delivers a stolen car to the buyer and takes its
price, and then the buyer is compelled to return the car to the true owner, the
buyer is entitled to recover from the seller the price paid by him.'
Duty to pay interest
When the buyer has already paid the price of the goods to the seller but the seller fails to perform
his part of the contract, the buyer is entitled to the refund of the price. Similarly, when the
consideration for the payment made has failed, the buyer can recover back the price. In his suit
for refund of the price, the buyer is also entitled to interest on the amount of the price from the
date of the payment of the price to the date of the refund of the same.
In State Trading Corporation v. Tara Jewellers,' due to Governments' ban on export a contract
for the purchase of silver for export was frustrated. In a claim for the refund of the price as well
as interest thereon, Calcutta High Court allowed the refund as well as interest @ 6% p.a. from
the date of suit till refund date.
Duty to pay damages for breach of warranty
Where there is a breach of warranty on the part of a seller, the seller is bound
to pay the damages to the buyer for the breach of warranty.
In Mason v. Burningham, the buyer purchased a second hand typewriter for £ 20 and subsequently
spent £ 11 on getting it overhauled. The typewriter turned out to be stolen property and the buyer had
to return the same to its owner. It was held that the buyer was entitled to recover from the seller not
only the sum of £ 20 paid by him to the seller by way of price but also the sum of £ 11 spent by him
on its overhauling.
In Randall v. Newson, the plaintiff purchased a pole for his carriage for £ 3 from the defendant, a
coach-builder. The pole broke causing injuries to the horses resulting in a loss of £ 130 to the plaintiff.
If was held that the plaintiff could recover not only the sum of £ 3, the price paid for the pole but also
of £ 130 if that loss was considered by the jury to have arisen as a natural consequence of the defective
pole.
Thankyou !