Professional Documents
Culture Documents
• When international trade was limited in volume, payment for goods purchased
from another country was typically made in gold or silver. However, as the
volume of international trade expanded in the wake of the Industrial Revolution, a
more convenient means of financing international trade was needed.
• Shipping large quantities of gold and silver around the world to finance
international trade seemed impractical. The solution adopted was to arrange for
payment in paper currency and for governments to agree to convert the paper
currency into gold on demand at a fixed rate.
MECHANICS OF THE GOLD STANDARD
• Pegging currencies to gold and guaranteeing convertibility is known as the gold standard.
• By 1880, most of the world’s major trading nations, including Great Britain, Germany, Japan, and
the United States, had adopted the gold standard. Given a common gold standard, the value of any
currency in units of any other currency (the exchange rate) was easy to determine.
• For example, under the gold standard, 1 U.S. dollar was defined as equivalent to 23.22 grains of
“fine” (pure) gold.
• Thus, one could, in theory, demand that the U.S. government convert that one dollar into 23.22
grains of gold. Because there are 480 grains in an ounce, one ounce of gold cost $20.67
(480/23.22).
• The amount of a currency needed to purchase one ounce of gold was referred to as the gold par
value.
• The British pound was valued at 113 grains of fine gold In other words, one ounce of gold cost
£4.25 (480/113). From the gold par values of pounds and dollars,
• we can calculate what the exchange rate was for converting pounds into dollars; it was £1 = $4.87
(i.e., $20.67/£4.25).
THE PERIOD BETWEEN THE WARS: 1918–1939
• The gold standard worked reasonably well from the 1870s until the the start of World War I in
1914, when it was abandoned.
• During the war, several governments financed part of their massive military expenditures by
printing money. This resulted in inflation, and by the war’s end in 1918, price levels were higher
everywhere. The United States returned to the gold standard in 1919
• The United States followed suit and left the gold standard in 1933 but returned to it in 1934,
raising the dollar price of gold from $20.67 per ounce to $35.00 per ounce. Because more dollars
were needed to buy an ounce of gold than before, the implication was that the dollar was worth
less This effectively amounted to a devaluation of the dollar relative to other currencies.
• Thus, before the devaluation, the pound/dollar exchange rate was £1 = $4.87, but after the
devaluation it was £1 = $8.24
The Bretton Woods System
• The Bretton Woods agreement also called for a system of fixed exchange rates
that would be policed by the IMF. Under the agreement, all countries were to fix
the value of their currency in terms of gold but were not required to exchange
their currencies for gold. Only the dollar remained convertible into gold—at a
price of $35 per ounce.
The Bretton Woods System
Foreign Exchange Market
The foreign exchange market is a market for converting the currency of one country
into that of another country.
An exchange rate is simply the rate at which one currency is converted into another.
Due to its central role in so many foreign exchange deals, the dollar is a vehicle
currency. In 2018, 90 percent of all foreign exchange transactions involved dollars on
one side of the transaction. After the dollar, the most important vehicle currencies were
the euro (31 percent), the Japanese yen (21 percent), and the British pound (12 percent)
—reflecting the historical importance of these trading entities in the world economy.
For example, Toyota uses the foreign exchange market to convert the dollars it earns
from selling cars in the United States into Japanese yen.
The foreign exchange market is the lubricant that enables companies based in countries
that use different currencies to trade with each other.
This chapter has three main objectives.
• At the beginning of the year, a basket of goods costs $200 in the United States and
¥20,000 in Japan, so the dollar/yen exchange rate, according to PPP theory, should be $1
= ¥100.
• At the end of the year, the basket of goods still costs $200 in the United States, but it
costs ¥22,000 in Japan. PPP theory predicts that the exchange rate should change as a
result.
• More precisely, by the end of the year E$/¥ = $200/¥22,000
• Thus, ¥1 = $0.0091 (or $1 = ¥110).
• Because of 10 percent price inflation,
• the Japanese yen has depreciated by 10 percent against the dollar.
• One dollar will buy 10 percent more yen at the end of the year than at the beginning.
Money Supply and Price Inflation
• PPP theory predicts that changes in relative prices will result in a change in
exchange rates.
• If we can predict what a country’s future inflation rate is likely to be, we can also
predict how the value of its currency relative to other currencies—its exchange
rate—is likely to change. The growth rate of a country’s money supply determines
its likely future inflation rate.
• connection between the growth in a country’s money supply, price inflation, and
exchange rate movements. Put simply, when the growth in a country’s money
supply is faster than the growth in its output, price inflation is fueled.
• The PPP theory tells us that a country with a high inflation rate will see
depreciation in its currency exchange rate.
INTEREST RATES AND EXCHANGE
RATES
• In countries where inflation is expected to be high, interest rates also will be high, because investors want
compensation for the decline in the value of their money.
• The Fisher effect states that a country’s “nominal” interest rate (i) is the sum of the required “real” rate of
interest (r) and the expected rate of inflation over the period for which the funds are to be lent (π). More
formally, i ≈ r + π
• For example, if the real rate of interest in a country is 5 percent and annual inflation is expected to be 10
percent, the nominal interest rate will be 15 percent.
• As predicted by the Fisher effect, a strong relationship seems to exist between inflation rates and interest
rates.
Fisher Effect on International Market
• if the real interest rate in Japan was 10 percent and only 6 percent in the United States, it would pay investors
to borrow money in the United States and invest it in Japan.
• The resulting increase in the demand for money in the United States would raise the real interest rate there,
while the increase in the supply of foreign money in Japan would lower the real interest rate there.
• This would continue until the two sets of real interest rates were equalized.
• It follows from the Fisher effect that if the real interest rate is the same worldwide, any difference in interest
rates between countries reflects differing expectations about inflation rates. Thus, if the expected rate of
inflation in the United States is greater than that in Japan, U.S. nominal interest rates will be greater than
Japanese nominal interest rates.
International Fisher effect (IFE)
• The International Fisher effect (IFE) states that for any two countries, the spot exchange rate should change
in an equal amount but in the opposite direction to the difference in nominal interest rates between the two
countries
where i$ and i¥ are the respective nominal interest rates in the United States and Japan,
S1 is the spot exchange rate at the beginning of the period, and S2 is the spot exchange rate at the end of the
period.
If the U.S. nominal interest rate is higher than Japan’s, reflecting greater expected inflation rates, the value of
the dollar against the yen should fall by that interest rate differential in the future.
So if the interest rate in the United States is 10 percent and in Japan it is 6 percent,
we would expect the value of the dollar to depreciate by 4 percent against the Japanese yen
INVESTOR PSYCHOLOGY AND BANDWAGON EFFECTS
• Investor psychology can be influenced by political factors and by microeconomic events, such as the
investment decisions of individual firms many of which are only loosely linked to macroeconomic
fundamentals, such as relative inflation rates.
• The bandwagon effect is a psychological phenomenon in which people do something primarily
because other people are doing it, regardless of their own beliefs, which they may ignore or
override. This tendency of people to align their beliefs and behaviors with those of a group is also
called a herd mentality.
Exchange Rate Forecasting
• THE EFFICIENT MARKET SCHOOL: An efficient market is one in which prices
reflect all available public information. (If forward rates reflect all
available information about likely future changes in exchange rates, a
company cannot beat the market by investing in forecasting services.)
• THE INEFFICIENT MARKET SCHOOL: An inefficient market is one in
which prices do not reflect all available information. In an inefficient
market, forward exchange rates will not be the best possible
predictors of future spot exchange rates.
APPROACHES TO FORECASTING
• The variables used in fundamental analysis are relative money supply growth
rates, inflation rates, and interest rates they may include variables related to
balance-of-payments positions
• Technical analysis uses price and volume data to determine past trends, Technical
analysis is based on the premise that there are analyzable market trends and waves
and that previous trends and waves can be used to predict future trends and waves.
Since there is no theoretical rationale for this assumption of predictability, many
economists compare technical analysis to fortune-telling
Currency Convertibility