Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Case Study: Modular Versus Traditional UPS Systems
Case Study: Modular Versus Traditional UPS Systems
Case Study
Modular versus Traditional UPS Systems
Modular Design
Advantage at a glance
Convenient Operations
Easy upgrade/extension (scalability)
High system flexibility
Higher System Availability
Lower Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)
Lower energy consumption
Optimized investment over time (scalability)
Space saving
Lower spare part inventory
Environment friendly UPS
Low CO2 Emissions
© ABB
4/25/23 | Slide 2
Scalability (1/2)
Vertically… Horizontally…
Up to 5 modules
fit into the
system Modules
operate mutual
load sharing
Up to 200kW per
cabinet
Every module is Additional racks (6) can be
stand-bye at all added to provide the right
time power protection over time
Up to 1200kW
© ABB
4/25/23 | Slide 3
Scalability (2/2)
Benefits
Possible to start with a just a few
modules and add them as required
No need to operate a UPS system
designed for the full capacity
No waste of electrical energy due to
right-sizing
Lower initial capital investment
Redundancy at all time
Optimized spare part management
© ABB
4/25/23 | Slide 4
System Extension – Traditional UPS System
© ABB
4/25/23 | Slide 5
System Extension – Advanced Modular System
7 x 40 kVA 10 x 40 kVA
Modules Modules
© ABB
4/25/23 | Slide 6
System Flexibility
Aisle 1
Over-Capacity SPARE
SPARE
40kVA
40kVA
module can be
Aisle 2
„swapped-over“
SPARE
within a few minutes!
SPARE
40kVA
Overload
40kVA
40kVA
SERVER
RACK
© ABB
4/25/23 | Slide 7
Redundancy Right-Sizing
40 kW Module
40 kW Module
40 kW Module
40 kW Module
40 kW Module
200kVA 200kVA
The traditional configuration covers the A modular system covers the load by 5
load by two identical UPS, each able identical UPS modules, each able to
to deliver the requested full load. deliver up to 4/5 of the requested full
Power. This set-up is “over-sized”. load power. This set-up is “optimized”.
120kVA
120kVA 120kVA
LOAD 240kVA/192kW
© ABB
4/25/23 | Slide 10
TCO: Savings in Power Consumption (1/2)
Situation
Clients Load: 144 kW
Energy CostskWh = 0.1 EUR
Location Air Conditioned Rooms
Operation time 5 years
Solution
Traditional Non-Modular (2x200kVA) Advanced Modular (5 x 50 kVA / 40 kW)
(1+1)-Redundant Configuration (4+1)-Redundant Configuration
40 kW Module 1
40 kW Module
+
40 kW Module 200 kVA
160 kW 4
40 kW Module
200kVA 200kVA 40 kW Module
160kW 160kW
© ABB
4/25/23 | Slide 11
TCO: Savings in Power Consumption (2/2)
Calculation
Cooling Costs per year (Factor 1.4) 5’606 EUR 2’803 EUR
© ABB
4/25/23 | Slide 12
Capital Costs (1/2)
Building/Footprint Costs
A traditional UPS based on two UPS
units typically needs two to three times
the amount of floor space in m2 required
for a modular UPS
© ABB
4/25/23 | Slide 13
Capital Costs (2/2)
Maintenance costs
Maintenance of traditional UPS system is
more time consuming
Maintenance costs of modular systems
are up to 30% lower compared with
traditional UPS
© ABB
4/25/23 | Slide 14
Appendix 2: Efficiency curves
© ABB
4/25/23 | Slide 15