Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Module 2
Module 2
CAPP
A process layout is one where the processes, workstations or
departments are organized according to function. This type of layout is
typically used in low volume, high-variety manufacturing where demand
is too low or unpredictable for resources to be dedicated to a particular
product or product groups, that is, a job shop.
For example, in the metal-working job shop in Fig. 1.12, similar
processes are grouped together such as drills and lathes.A part being
manufactured then travels from area to area according to the route
sheets and is processed in accordance with the operations lists, that is,
the process plans.
Advantages of a process layout when compared to a product layout
include:
resources are general purpose and thus less expensive;
it is more flexible as it is less vulnerable to changes in products;
equipment utilization is higher as processes are used across a high
variety of products;
employee supervision can be more specialized which is important
due to the high skill factor of personnel.
However, the process layout also has some distinct disadvantages
including:
processing rates tend to be slower;
production time is lost due to set-up due to frequent product changeover;
high inventory required to keep workstations busy;
lead times tend to be long and variable;
too much material handling;
the numerous routings and flows across the shop floor necessitate the
use of simple carrying devices such as carts;
production planning and control is more difficult;
It can also be the case that further details of the tooling specified in the
operations list is detailed in a tooling list, an example of which is illustrated in
Fig.
Figure 2.8 Example of tooling list
Process planning and industrial engineering
The main outputs of process planning were identified as the routing sheet and the
operations sheet. The use of reference materials such as machining and tooling data was
also described. As machine and tool manufacturers provide this, it is external
information. However, there are various sources of internal information that are used by
the process planner, the majority of which is generated by industrial engineering
through work study. For example, the documentation of manufacturing methods from a
methods study usually takes the form of a process chart.
Of these charts, the flow process chart is probably the most useful because it
clearly details not only the value-added activities,but those non-value-added
activities such as transportation and handling as illustrated in the basic
example in Fig.
Figure 2.9 Example of a basic flow process chart
Process plans must be prepared not only for the manufacture of every
component for a product, but also for the assembly of the components.
Therefore, assembly process charts are used in the preparation of assembly
process plans.
Considering the disadvantages listed above for manual process planning, a huge
amount of research has been carried out in the area of CAPP. In fact, more research
effort has been expended in this area than any other area of manufacturing (Hannam,
1997). Not surprisingly, a huge number of CAPP systems have been developed. This is
highlighted in a survey by Zhang andAlting (1994) that identified 187 software
packages. The advantages of such CAPP systems are considered to be (Rembold et al.,
1993):
less time spent on process planning;
less reliance on the knowledge and experience of the process planner;
more efficient use of manufacturing resources leading to improvements
in costs;
improved productivity;
improved accuracy and consistency of process plans.
Variant approach
This approach to CAPP is similar to the manual approach as it retrieves a standard plan
and modifies it to suit for a given part. The standard plan is usually for a composite
part that incorporates all the features for a particular group or family of parts. The parts
are usually grouped according to how they are made using a GT classification and
coding system. The process plan for the part under consideration is compiled by
retrieving those parts of the standard plan that are relevant. Thus, the variant approach
is also known as the retrieval method. Although popular in industry due to their relative
ease of implementation and use, the major disadvantage of variant systems is that plans
can be developed only for parts that have previously been classified as one of the part
families.
Generative approach
As its name suggests, this approach to CAPP is based on developing a completely new
plan for every part. These plans are produced by the computer by means of decision logic,
formulae, algorithms and geometric analysis. Intheory, there need be no human
intervention. However, in reality this is rarely the case as for most systems some
intervention is required. The main components of a generative system are (Wang and Li,
1991):
a part description that defines the geometry including geometric and
dimensional tolerances and surface finish specifications;
a subsystem that defines the process parameters based on reference data
and process analysis;
a subsystem that identifies and sequences the individual operations using
the means described above;
a database of information on the production equipment available;
a report generator to produce the process plan.