This document provides an introduction to finite automata and regular languages. It discusses deterministic finite acceptors (DFAs) which have a finite number of states and deterministically transition between those states based on input symbols. Nondeterministic finite automata (NFAs) are also introduced, which may have multiple possible state transitions for a given input. The document states that NFAs and DFAs are equivalent in terms of the languages they can recognize, and that it is important to find a minimal DFA with the fewest number of states to represent a given regular language.
This document provides an introduction to finite automata and regular languages. It discusses deterministic finite acceptors (DFAs) which have a finite number of states and deterministically transition between those states based on input symbols. Nondeterministic finite automata (NFAs) are also introduced, which may have multiple possible state transitions for a given input. The document states that NFAs and DFAs are equivalent in terms of the languages they can recognize, and that it is important to find a minimal DFA with the fewest number of states to represent a given regular language.
This document provides an introduction to finite automata and regular languages. It discusses deterministic finite acceptors (DFAs) which have a finite number of states and deterministically transition between those states based on input symbols. Nondeterministic finite automata (NFAs) are also introduced, which may have multiple possible state transitions for a given input. The document states that NFAs and DFAs are equivalent in terms of the languages they can recognize, and that it is important to find a minimal DFA with the fewest number of states to represent a given regular language.
• Simple automaton, a finite state accepter. • It is finite because it has only a finite set of internal states and no other memory. • It is called an accepter because it processes strings and either accepts or rejects them, so we can think of it as a simple pattern recognition mechanism. • We start with a deterministic finite accepter, or dfa. • The adjective “deterministic” signifies that the automaton has one and only one option at any time. • We use dfa’s to define a certain type of language, called a regular language. • Nondeterministic automata (nfas). • In certain situations, an nfa can have several options and therefore can appear to have a choice. • A better way to visualize nondeterminism is to think that an nfa explores all choices (say, by a search and backtrack method) and makes no decision until all options have been analyzed. • The main reason for introducing nondeterminism is that it simplifies the solution of many problems. • We say that two accepters are equivalent if they accept the same language. • We can then also say that the class of nfa’s is equivalent to the class of dfa’s because for every every nfa, we can find an equivalent dfa. • For any given regular language there are many equivalent dfa’s, so it is of practical importance to find a minimal dfa, that is, a dfa with the smallest number of internal states. REFERENCES 1. Peter Linz, An Introduction to Formal Languages and Automat, (6e), Jones & Bartlett Learning, 2016