Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Disease
Learning Objectives
• Ultrasound
• Overall sensitivity is 50-86%
• Factors that influence diagnosis
• Gestational age
• Operator expertise
• Type of H-Mole
DIAGNOSIS
Ultrasound for Complete hydatidiform mole
Diagnosed in approximately 80% of cases particularly during the second
trimester when the grape-like or hydropic villous change occurs
DIAGNOSIS
Ultrasound for partial hydatidiform mole
Less accurate
As much as 70% of cases may be missed
Two sonographic findings
focal cystic changes in the placenta
a ratio of the transverse to antero-posterior dimension of the
gestational sac >1.5
DIAGNOSIS
Serum Beta hCG
• Correlation of the ultrasonographic findings with beta HCG levels can
further improve the recognition of a molar pregnancy prior to surgical
evacuation
Diagnosis
• Measurement of a high hCG >100,000 U/L is association with vaginal
bleeding and uterine enlargement highly suggests complete
hydatidiform mole
• In contrast partial hydatidiform mole is less commonly associated
with markedly elevated values
DIAGNOSIS
• Gold Standard for diagnosis is still based on histopathologic
evaluation
• Confirmatory Tests
• Cytogenetic Examinations are recommended when the
diagnosis of hydatidiform is in doubt
• Immunostaining may be performed in cases where the
histologic diagnosis is in doubt
• P57kip2
Management
• Complete and partial moles differ histopathologically, cytogenetically
and in clinical behavior. However, management is similar for both
types of hydatidiform mole
MANAGEMENT
Baseline laboratory Examinations
• CBC
• Blood typing, Rh
• BUN, Crea
• SGOT, SGPT
• Quantitative Beta hCG
• Urinalysis
• Chest X-ray
MANAGEMENT
Other examinations
• Serum electrolytes
• 12- lead ECG
• Arterial Blood Gas
• PT, PTT
• FT4, TSH
EVALUATE and TREAT Medical
Complications
• Anemia
• Hyperemesis Gravidarum
• Pre-eclampsia
• Hyperthyroidism
• Respiratory Insufficiency
• DIC
MANAGEMENT
• Evacuation of molar producers
• Definitive therapy
• Confirms pathologic diagnosis
• Relieves symptoms
• Prevents complications
Question #3
• A 27 year old, primigravid, 8 weeks AOG, consulted due to vaginal
spotting. Examination revealed a boggy corpus enlarged to 16
weeks with no fetal heart tones Cervix is closed. Ultrasound
showed a snow storm pattern and beta hCG was 164,000 mIU/ml.
What is the best mode of molar evacuation for her?
A. Medical induction
B. Hysterotomy
C. Suction Curettage
D. Hysterectomy
Management
Suction Curettage Hysterectomy
Preferred method regardless of Option for patients with
the patient’s age and uterine size completed family size
For patients with life threatening
hemorrhage
Decreases the risk for local
invasion
Does not eliminate the need fpr
post-evacuation momnitoring
MAnagement
Hysterotomy Medical Induction
More bleeding More Bleeding
Subsequent operative deliveries Incomplete evacuation
Higher risk of postmolar GTN Higher risk of postmolar GTN
Question #3
• A 27 year old, g1Po, 8 weeks AOG, consulted due to vaginal
spotting. Examination revealed a boggy corpus enlarged to 16
weeks with no fetal heart tones Cervix is closed. Ultrasound
showed a snow storm pattern and beta hCG was 164,000 nIU ml.
What is the best mode of molar evacuation for her?
A. Medical induction
B. Hysterotomy
C. Suction Curettage
D. Hysterectomy
Management
General Guidelines
Cervical ripening done only through mechanical means
Theca lutein cysts are best left alone during laparotomy
Patients who are Rh negative should receive Rh immune globulin at
the time of evacuation because the Rh D factor is expressed on
trophoblast
All tissues obtained during molar evacuation should be submitted
for histologic evaluation
Routine repeat curettage after the diagnosis of a molar pregnancy
is not warranted
prognosis
• Risk of malignant degeneration
• Complete Mole 15-25%
• Partial Mole 0.5-4%