Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ENTREPRENEURSHIP FUNDAMENTALS
(ENF123)
COURSE LECTURER: MS FAITH KACHOKA
TITLE: SENIOR LECTURER
COMPILED BY: MS FAITH KACHOKA
SEMESTER: APRIL TO SEPTEMBER 2022
Unit Four: Growth of
Entrepreneurship
EMERGENCE OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP
◦ Looking at the emergence of entrepreneurship; we will focus on two theorists: Schumpeter and McClelland
Schumpeter developed the Innovation Theory of Entrepreneurship; and we know that for innovation to happen
there must be creativity and this may be an economic development or an economic activity (combination of factors
of production).
◦ For economic development to happen, there should be an economic activity taking place and the entrepreneur should
be at the center of the economic development.
◦ Schumpeter has tried to establish a correlation between the economic activity and economic development of a
country.
◦ According to him the innovation function of entrepreneurs is responsible for the rapid economic development of any
country.
◦ For someone to become an entrepreneur, he or she needs to be innovative and innovation is responsible for economic
development.
• According to Schumpeter’s Innovation Theory of Entrepreneurship, for someone to qualify as an entrepreneur then he
must:
Introduce a new product or service which consumers are not familiar with.
Introduce new materials.
Introduce new technology for production.
Carry out a new form of organization
The theory is only emphasizing on innovation and there are other factors that can make someone a successful
entrepreneur apart from being innovative.
It does not consider others who are using established enterprises as entrepreneurs.
If you are not innovative, you cease to be an entrepreneur.
Schumpeter has given undue emphasis on the innovative function of entrepreneurs and has ignored the other
equally important functions.
The theory neglects the role of small entrepreneurs in economic development. It stresses on establishment of large
enterprises based on new combinations of production.
The theory fails to give satisfactory answers to questions like why some countries have more entrepreneurship
talent than others.
• In spite of the above criticisms, Schumpeter’s theory is regarded as a milestone in the development of entrepreneurship
theories.
On the other hand let us look at what David McClelland says about entrepreneurs.
• His theory is known as the Achievement Motivation Theory of Entrepreneurship.
• McClelland looks at the motive; he says high achievement motives make or induce one to become an entrepreneur.
McClelland’s theory states that:
If a person has a high achievement motive then he is likely going to become an entrepreneur.
Individuals with a high level of achievement will be motivated to become entrepreneurs because they have a
tendency of striving for excellence; achieving high levels of success for the sake of personal accomplishments and
not the rewards.
The motive of high achievement, guides the actions of people and induces them towards entrepreneurship and
they are very likely going to succeed in their venture.
There is need to develop the need for high achievement in people by making deliberate efforts of making the
person, from childhood have the desire to achieve high.
It is not possible to teach or train all children to have high achievement desires.
After training, someone he may still decide to change as he grows older.
The focus of this theory is only on psychological factors and ignores the other factors of development.
ECONOMIC AND NON-ECONOMIC FACTORS NECESSARY FOR ENTREPRENEURSHIP DEVELOPMENT
ECONOMIC FACTORS
Storage of capital
Lack of infrastructure facilities e.g. good road networks, ports, communications infrastructure, etc.
Skilled labor shortage
Defective tax structures e.g. high tax rates
Non-availability of raw materials
Lack of technology
NON-ECONOMIC FACTORS
Social factors: the customs and traditions that a country has.
Personal factors: this may be a lack of creativity and low achievement motives.
Other factors: these include increasing competition, lack of political will, complex laws.