Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(Chapter 6)
1
No matter how many winners you’ve got, if you
either leverage too much or do anything that
gives you the chance of having a zero in
there, it’ll all turn into pumpkins and mice.
Warren Buffett
2
Outline
Introduction
Alpha and Portfolio Management
Role of the Capital Markets
Efficient Market Hypothesis
Anomalies
3
What is “alpha”?
Alpha = the amount by which the market is beaten, after
adjusting for risk
What is alpha for the market as a whole?
Alpha for market as a whole is zero
– So, on average, portfolios are ON the SML
Provides conceptual value of CAPM
– Regardless of whether market is efficient, it is still a zero-sum
game
Burden of active manager
– In order to win (i.e., beat the market), someone else has to lose
Key question = what is special about you (and about
your knowledge) that will allow you to be the one that
wins?
4
Generating alpha
Are there ways to consistently generate
alpha?
See portfolio manager performance
example:
5
Portfolio Manager’s Performance:
Past Three Years
Fund
Previous Three Years: S&P 500 Manager
6
Portfolio Manager’s Performance:
Past Four Years
Fund
Previous Four Years: S&P 500 Manager
7
Portfolio Manager’s Performance:
Past Five Years
Fund
Previous Five Years: S&P 500 Manager
8
Portfolio Manager’s Performance:
Past Six Years
Fund
Previous Six Years: S&P 500 Manager
9
Generating alpha
Would you have invested with this manager?
Who is this manager with this horrible record?
Warren Buffett, of course!!!
Portfolio = investment in Berkshire-Hathaway, over
the period of 1970 – 1975
Note: while stock price lagged market
substantially, book value per share grew faster
than market each year except 1975; this is a
metric with which Buffett is more concerned
10
Generating alpha
As we have seen previously in discussing the EMH, value
stocks tend to outperform growth stocks
Concomitantly, Warren Buffett has the best investment
record in history, becoming the 2nd richest man in the world
in the process
However, as we have just now seen, although value wins
on average, over the long run, it does not win perfectly
consistently!
Instead, the markets tend to cycle, with different styles of
investment performing well at different times
11
Book to Market as a Predictor of Return:
Value (positive ) tends to outperform Growth (negative )
25%
Annualized Rate of Return
20%
15%
10%
Value
5% Growth
0%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
High Book/Market Low Book/Market
12
Rolling Annualized Average 5-year Difference
Between the Returns to Value and Growth Composites:
The Market cycles between Value and Growth,
50%
But Value Wins on Average
40%
30%
Relative Difference
20%
10%
0%
1990
1986
1988
1977
1978
1983
1984
1989
1973
1974
1975
1976
1979
1980
1981
1982
1985
1987
1991
1997
1996
1993
1994
1992
1995
-10%
-20%
Year
13
Empirical Regularities:
Sources of alpha
Three categories that tend to outperform over the long run:
– Value stocks vs. Growth stocks
– Size: Small caps tend to outperform large caps
– Momentum: stocks with momentum (earnings or price) tend to beat stocks
without momentum
However, the payoffs to all of these tend to cycle!
– A typical portfolio manager, being judged on a quarter-by-quarter basis, would
have been fired long before if he had the same record as Buffett for 1970 –
1975!
– (In fact, he fired himself during this period!)
None of these beats the market perfectly consistently
– A typical portfolio manager would need to try to cycle along with the market, in
order to keep from ever lagging too far behind it
14
Empirical Regularities:
Sources of alpha
Beating the market consistently would require some sort of
rotation strategy in order to profit from the type of securities
that are performing well in the given type of market
But - combination of “fat tails” and “volatility clustering”
(discussed previously) can cause problems!
– Best performance for a given style is likely to follow closely on the
heels of its worst performance, and much of the movement for the
style is likely to come in a relatively short burst (thus, if you miss it,
it’s gone)
– E.g.: 40% of the stock market gains for the entire decade of the
1980’s occurred during a mere 10 trading days !
– So efforts to cycle with the market and keep from falling too far
behind it also make it much more difficult to beat the market!
15
Capital Market Theory
Capital market theory springs from the
notion that:
– People like return
– People do not like risk
– Dispersion around expected return is a
reasonable measure of risk
16
Role of the Capital Markets
Definition
Economic Function
Continuous Pricing Function
Fair Price Function
17
Definition
Capital markets trade securities with lives of
more than one year
Examples of capital markets
– New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)
– American Stock Exchange (AMEX)
– Chicago Board of Trade
– Chicago Board Options Exchange (CBOE)
18
Economic Function
The economic function of capital markets
facilitates the transfer of money from savers
to borrowers
– e.g., mortgages, Treasury bonds, corporate
stocks and bonds
19
Continuous Pricing Function
The continuous pricing function of capital
markets means prices are available moment
by moment
– Continuous prices are an advantage to
investors
21
Efficient Market Hypothesis
Definition
Forms of Efficiency
– Weak Form
– Semi-Strong Form
– Strong Form
Security Prices and Random Walks
22
Definition
The efficient market hypothesis (EMH) is the
theory supporting the notion that market prices are
in fact fair
– Under the EMH, security prices fully and fairly (i.e.,
without bias) reflect all available information about the
security
– Since the 1960’s, the EMH has been perhaps the most
important paradigm in finance
– Whether markets are efficient has been extensively
researched and remains controversial
23
Informational Efficiency
Informational efficiency is a measure of
how quickly and accurately the market
reacts to new information
– This is the type of efficiency with which the EMH
is concerned
– The market is informationally very efficient
Security prices adjust rapidly and fairly accurately to
new information
However, as we’ve already seen, the market is still
not completely efficient
24
Forms of Market Efficiency
Eugene Fama’s original formulation of the Efficient
Market Hypothesis established three forms of market
efficiency, based on the level of information reflected in
security prices:
1. Weak form = prices reflect all past market level (price
and volume) information
2. Semi-strong form = prices also reflect all publicly
available fundamental company and economic
information
3. Strong form = prices also reflect all privately held
information that would affect the value of the company
and its securities
25
Weak Form
Definition
Charting
Runs Test
26
Definition
The weak form of the EMH states that it is
impossible to predict future stock prices by
analyzing prices from the past
– The current price is a fair one that considers
any information contained in the past price data
– Charting techniques are of no use in predicting
stock prices
27
Definition (cont’d)
Example
Stock A
Stock B
28
Definition (cont’d)
Example (cont’d)
29
Charting
People who study charts are technical
analysts or chartists
– Chartists look for patterns in a sequence of
stock prices
– Many chartists have a behavioral element
30
Runs Test
A runs test is a nonparametric statistical
technique to test the likelihood that a series of
price movements occurred by chance
– A run is an uninterrupted sequence of the same
observation
– A runs test calculates the number of ways an observed
number of runs could occur given the relative number of
different observations and the probability of this number
– These tests have provided evidence in favor of weak
form efficiency
31
Conducting A Runs Test
Rx
Z
where R number of runs
2n1n2
x 1
n1 n2
2n1n2 (2n1n2 n1 n2 )
n1 n2
2
(n1 n2 1)
n1 , n2 number of observations in each category
Z standard normal variable
32
Semi-Strong Form
The semi-strong form of the EMH states that
security prices fully reflect all publicly
available information
– e.g., past stock prices, economic reports,
brokerage firm recommendations, investment
advisory letters, etc.
33
Semi-Strong Form (cont’d)
Academic research supports the semi-
strong form of the EMH by investigating
various corporate announcements, such as:
– Stock splits
– Cash dividends
– Stock dividends
– Examined through “event studies”
This means investors are seldom going to
beat the market by analyzing public news
34
Semi-Strong Form (cont’d)
Market seems to do a relatively good job at adjusting a
stock’s valuation for certain types of new information
• Determining how much the new info. will change the stock’s value
and then adjusting the price by an equivalent amount
This is what event studies examine
• But it does seem to have problems developing an overall
valuation for a stock in the first place
• E.g., What is the correct value for IBM as a whole is a very difficult
question to answer, but how much IBM’s value should change if it
is awarded a specific new contract is much easier to determine
35
Semi-Strong Form (cont’d)
Burton Malkiel points out that two-thirds of
professionally managed portfolios are consistently
beaten by a low-cost index fund
– Suggests that securities are accurately priced and that
in the long run returns will be consistent with the level of
systematic risk taken
Supports semi-strong form of the EMH
– Also would suggest that portfolio managers do not
possess any private information that is not already
reflected in security prices
Supports the strong form of the EMH
36
Strong Form
The strong form of the EMH states that
security prices fully reflect all relevant public
and private information
This would mean even corporate insiders
cannot make abnormal profits by using
inside information about their company
– Inside information is information not available
to the general public
37
Security Prices and
Random Walks
The unexpected portion of news follows a
random walk
– News arrives randomly and security prices
adjust to the arrival of the news
We cannot forecast specifics of the news very
accurately
38
Anomalies
Definition
Low PE Effect
Low-Priced Stocks
Small Firm and Neglected Firm Effect
Market Overreaction
Value Line Enigma
January Effect
39
Anomalies (cont’d)
Day-of-the-Week Effect
Turn-of-the Calendar Effect
Persistence of Technical Analysis
Behavioral Finance
Joint Hypothesis Problem
Chaos Theory
40
Definition
A financial anomaly refers to unexplained
results that deviate from those expected
under finance theory
– Especially those related to the efficient market
hypothesis
41
Low PE Effect
Stocks with low PE ratios provide higher returns
than stocks with higher PEs
– And similarly for high P/B (hence lower Book/Market)
stocks
Supported by several academic studies
Conflicts directly with the CAPM, since study
returns were risk-adjusted (Basu)
Related to both semi-strong form and weak form
efficiency
42
Low-Priced Stocks
Stocks with a “low” stock price earn higher
returns than stocks with a “high” stock price
There is an optimum trading range
43
Small Firm and Neglected Firm
Effects
Small Firm Effect
Neglected Firm Effect
44
Small Firm Effect
Investing in firms with low market
capitalization will provide superior risk-
adjusted returns
Supported by academic studies
Implies that portfolio managers should give
small firms particular attention
45
Neglected Firm Effect
Security analysts do not pay as much
attention to firms that are unlikely portfolio
candidates
Implies that neglected firms may offer
superior risk-adjusted returns
46
Market Overreaction
The tendency for the market to overreact to
extreme news
– Investors may be able to predict systematic
price reversals
Results because people often rely too
heavily on recent data at the expense of the
more extensive set of prior data
47
The Value Line Enigma
Value Line (VL) publishes financial information on
about 1,700 stocks
The report includes a timing rank from 1 down to 5
Firms ranked 1 substantially outperform the market
Firms ranked 5 substantially underperform the
market
Victor Niederhoffer refers to Value Line’s ratings as
“the periodic table of investing”
48
The Value Line Enigma
Changes in rankings result in a fast price
adjustment
Some contend that the Value Line effect is merely
the unexpected earnings anomaly due to changes
in rankings from unexpected earnings
Nonetheless, Value Line’s successful record is
evidence in support of the existence of superior
analysts who apparently possess private
information
49
January Effect
Stock returns are inexplicably high in
January
Small firms do better than large firms early
in the year
Especially pronounced for the first five
trading days in January
50
January Effect (cont’d)
Possible explanations:
– Tax-loss trading late in December (Branch)
– The risk of small stocks is higher early in the
year (Rogalski and Tinic)
51
January Returns by Type of Firm
52
Day-of-the-Week Effect
Mondays are historically bad days for the
stock market
Wednesday and Fridays are consistently
good
Tuesdays and Thursdays are a mixed bag
53
Day-of-the-Week
Effect (cont’d)
Should not occur in an efficient market
– Once a profitable trading opportunity is
identified, it should disappear
The day-of-the-week effect continues to
persist
However – there are confounding effects
between the levels and the volatilities of
returns across different days
54
Turn-of-the-Calendar Effect
The bulk of the return comes from the last
trading day of the month and the first few
days of the following month
For the rest of the month, the ups and
downs approximately cancel out
55
Persistence of
Technical Analysis
Technical analysis refers to any technique in
which past security prices or other publicly
available information are employed to
predict future prices
Studies show the markets are efficient in the
weak form
Literature based on technical techniques
continues to appear but should be useless
56
Behavioral Finance
Concerned with the analysis of various
psychological traits of individuals and how these
traits affect the manner in which they act as
investors, analysts, and portfolio managers
Growth companies will usually not be growth
stocks due to the overconfidence of analysts
regarding future growth rates and valuations
Notion of “herd mentality” of analysts in stock
recommendations or quarterly earnings estimates
is confirmed
57
Chaos Theory
Chaos theory refers to instances in which
apparently random behavior is systematic or even
deterministic
– under Mauboussin’s theory of the market as a complex
adaptive system, then we would expect to see chaotic
dynamics
Econophysics refers to the application of physics
principles in the analysis of stock market behavior
– e.g., an investment strategy based on studies of
turbulence in wind tunnels
– Includes use of multifractal models
58
Are Markets Rational?
This question always faces a joint hypothesis
problem:
– Tests of EMH are always dual tests of both market
efficiency and the specific asset-pricing model assumed
– Market efficiency
Is the stock’s price equal to its true value?
– Asset pricing model used (CAPM, APT, etc.)
What is the stock’s true value?
Never known for sure
“The question of value presupposes an answer to the question,
of value to whom, and for what?” – Ayn Rand
E.g., the value of Apple stock would be different to Steve Jobs
than to any other investor 59
Are Markets Rational?
Related issue – what is information?
– “Information is that which causes changes” – Claude
Shannon (father of information theory)
– So, if something causes the markets to move, then by
definition, it must be information, and vice versa
– From this perspective, the market is neither efficient nor
inefficient, it just is
So, are the markets efficient or rational?
– Ultimately, difficult to answer categorically
– Key question is not whether or not the markets are efficient
– this is a side issue – but how investors should act, given
how the markets work
60