PRIVATE COMPANY (PTY) LTD • A private company is a profit company whose MOI prohibits the offering of shares to the public and restricts the transferability of its shares. • There are no restrictions on the number of shareholders under the 2008 Act however the 1973 Act restricted shareholders to maximum of 50. • Smuts v Booyens, Markplaas (Edms) Bpk v Booyens the court stressed that the restricted transferability of a company’s shares is an essential attribute of a private company and a shareholder’s right to transfer shares at all must be restricted by the company’s MOI. • The manner in which restriction apply must be set out in the MOI, the transferability od securities may be restricted by for example that the remaining existing shareholders have the first right to acquire the shares which another shareholder wishes to dispose( called Pre-emptive right). PRIVATE COMPANY (PTY) LTD WHAT IS A PRE-EMPTIVE RIGHT • A pre-emption right, right of pre-emption, or first option to buy is a contractual right to acquire certain property newly coming into existence before it can be offered to any other person or entity. • It is the right of existing shareholders in a corporation to purchase newly issued stock before it is offered to others. • The right is meant to protect current shareholders from dilution in value or control. • Silndler NO v Gees and six Other Cases 2006 (5) SA 501- NB page 45 textBoo PRIVATE COMPANY (PTY) LTD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REFUSAL TO TRANSFER SHARES In terms of section 15(7) of Companies Act any shareholders agreement must be consistent with the Act and with the MOI and any inconsistency is void to the extent of the inconsistency. • A shareholders agreement cannot impose further restrictions or alter exisiting restrictions in an MOI. • Visser Sitrus (Pty) Ltd v Goede Hoop Sitrus (Pty) Ltd case no. 15854/2013 (19 June 2014). • In the Visser Sitrus case, the MOI of the target company (Goede Hoop Sitrus or GHS) contained a clause that provided that:“no shareholder may transfer the registered or beneficial ownership of any Ordinary Shares in the Company to any other party without first complying with the requirements for transfer as set out in the Act and in this MOI and obtaining the approval of the board for such transfer. • One of the shareholders of GHS, Visser Sitrus (VS), wished to sell its shares to an entity that was in the process of consolidating control over GHS, and the board was not pleased with this situation. The board accordingly refused the transfer without giving reasons for its decision. • The court held that there is no general duty on a person holding a fiduciary position to give reasons for his actions to those to whom their duties are owed. The duty of a fiduciary to render an account is a duty to disclose what he has done in the course of his administration, not why he has done it.