For Employees

REORIENTA
SP
1
ON
TION
2
5
STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
6
1 COURSE OUTLINE
2 This Reorientation on SPMS intends to
discuss the following:
3
• Government Issuances Related to SPMS
4 • General Concepts and Objectives
• The Performance Management Team (PMT) and PMS Cycle
• Personnel Performance Measures
5 • Performance Standards Guide
• Rating Forms, Mechanisms and Computations
6
Source: Guidebook on the Strategic Performance Management System
1
QUICK OF
MAND
2
TH
3
4
GLIMPSE
E
5
GOVERNMENT ISSUANCES RELATED TO SPMS
6
House of Representatives and The Senate
1
Congress Joint Resolution No. 4
Governing Principles of the Modified Compensation and Position
2 Classification System and Base Pay Schedule of the Government
3 Item 1 (d) A performance-based incentive

scheme which integrates personnel and
4 organizational performance shall be established
to reward exemplary civil servants and well
5
performing institutions.
6
1
3 Item 4 Step Increments – an employee may progress

from Step 1 to Step 8 of the salary grade allocation of
4 his/her position in recognition of meritorious
performance based on performance management
5 system approved by the CSC and/or through length
of service, in accordance with the rules and
6 regulations to be promulgated jointly by the DBM
and the CSC.
1
3 Item 17(c) The CSC, in developing the Performance

Management System, shall ensure that personnel
4 performance shall be linked with organizational
performance in order to enhance the performance
5 orientation of the compensation system.
6
Office of the President
1
Administrative Order No. 241
Mandating the Speedy Implementation of R.A. 9485 otherwise
2 known as the “Anti-Red Tape Act of 2007” and its Implementing
Rules and Regulations and Strengthening the Application Thereof
3
Section 5 Agencies shall institute a Performance
4 Evaluation System based on objectively measured
output and performance of personnel and units,
5 such as the Performance Management System-
Office Performance Evaluation System developed
6 by the CSC.
Office of the President
1
Administrative Order No. 25
Creating an Inter-Agency Task Force on the Harmonization of
2 National Government Performance Monitoring, Information and
Reporting Systems
3
A collaborative mechanism must be developed among these
4 oversight agencies that will establish a unified and integrated
Results-Based Performance Management System (RBPMS)
across all departments and agencies within the Executive
5
Branch of Government incorporating a common set
performance scorecard, and at the same time, creating an
6 accurate, accessible, and up-to-date government-wide,
sectoral, and organizational performance information system.
Civil Service Commission (CSC)
1
Memorandum Circular No. 6, s. 2012
Guidelines in the Establishment and Implementation of Agency
2 Strategic Performance Management System (SPMS)
3 Through Resolution No. 1200481 promulgated on

March 16, 2012 The CSC directs all government
4 agencies, including Local Government Units
(LGUs), to establish and implement the Strategic
5 Performance Management System (SPMS) based
on the guidelines provided thereof.
6
Department of Budget and Management (DBM)
1 Civil Service Commission (CSC)
Joint Circular No. 1, s. 2012
2 Rules and Regulation on the Grant of Step Increment/s Due to
Meritorious Performance and Step Increment/s Due to Length of Service
3
Item 5.1.1 Two (2) Step Increments due to
4 Meritorious Performance may be granted to a
qualified official or employee who has attained two
5 (2) ratings of “Outstanding” during the two (2)
rating periods within a calendar year.
6
Department of Budget and Management (DBM)
Joint Circular No. 1, s. 2012
2 Rules and Regulation on the Grant of Step Increment/s Due to
Meritorious Performance and Step Increment/s Due to Length of Service
3
Item 5.1.2 One (1) Step Increment due to
4 Meritorious Performance may be granted to a
qualified official or employee who has attained one
5 (1) rating of “Outstanding” and one (1) rating of
“Very Satisfactory”, or two (2) ratings of “Very
6 Satisfactory”, during the two (2) rating periods
within a calendar year.
Local Government Unit (LGU) of Santa Cruz
1
Executive Order No. 19, s. 2012
Establishment and Implementation of Agency SPMS of the
2 Municipality of Santa Cruz, Davao Del Sur and Designating the
Composition of The Performance Management Team
3
In order to adhere with and institutionalize this national
4 mandate, there is a need to establish and implement
the Strategic Performance Management System which
5 will be anchored to the mission and vision of this
agency by organizing the Key Players of said system to
6 follow through the SPMS process.
Memorandum Circular No. 13, s. 2011
2 Pursuant to Resolution No. 1100472 dated April 8, 2011
3 A Supervisor shall be the one who plans, programs,

delegates tasks and evaluate performance of
4 employee; monitors work outputs; maintains morale
and discipline among employees; develops
5 cooperation and ensure a well coordinated
workforce; and coordinates and cooperates with
other organizational units within the agency.4
6
4
Presidential Decree 988 Defining the Role, Duties and Responsibilities of Chiefs of Divisions in
the Departments and Agencies of the Government and Regularizing their Appointments (1976)
1
NON-COMPLIANCE
Non-compliance or violatioOR to these
VIOLATION
mandates and provisions may be ground for
2 disciplinary action(s) provided under:
3
• Book V of Executive Order 292
Administrative Code of 1987
4
• CSC Resolution No. 1101502
5 Revised Rules on Administrative Cases in the Civil Service (RRACCS)
6 Sanctions/Penalties also includes Disqualification for Performance-

Based Personnel Actions which would require the rating.
SP
1
2 TH
3
E
4
5
GENERAL CONCEPTS AND OBJECTIVES
6
1
? Why switch to Strategic Performance
Management System (SPMS)
2 The past performance evaluation and appraisal systems that
CSC implemented over the years have largely focused only
3 on individual appraisals, which were used for personnel
actions such as incentives, promotion, and separation.
However, they have not shown how employee performance
4
has contributed to or hindered organizational effectiveness.
5 To address the gaps and weaknesses found in previous evaluation

systems, the CSC recently introduced the Strategic Performance
Management System (SPMS) after its pilot test in 2011. The SPMS
6 incorporates the positive features of past initiatives.
1
2
Using the Performance Evaluation System (PES), the LGU
and its employees have encountered many issues as far as
3 performance appraisal is concerned.
• Generally ineffective in setting individual targets
4 • Performance Target and Performance Rating were done at same
time at the end of the rating period
5 • Employees basically did it for mere compliance
• No performance standards were set
• The ratings were subjective
6 • No commitment between the rater and the ratee
Source: Strategic Performance Management System (SPMS) Manual
1
2
To address all of these issues and weaknesses
3 found in the existing performance evaluation
system, the LGU Santa Cruz adopted a new
4 system, the so called Strategic Performance
Management System (SPMS).
5
6
1
2
SPMS The Concepts
A systematic process by which an agency

3 involves its employees, as individuals and as
members of a work unit, in improving
4 organizational effectiveness in the realization of
the agency’s vision, mission and strategic goals.
5
6
1
2
SPMS The Concepts
The accomplishment of work performed

3 by employees is tightly linked with the
4
over-arching vision of the agency so that
the employees’ work targets and subsequently
their work accomplishments serve to advance the
5
attainment of organizational goals.
6
1
2
SPMS The Concepts
An instrument that measures work

3
performance by individual employees and
4 the work units to which they belong, including
the work performance of the entire agency.
5
6
1
2
SPMS The Objectives
To concretize the linkage of overall

3
performance of the Municipal Government
4 of Santa Cruz with its Municipal Comprehensive
Development Plan (MCDP) and the Philippine
5 Development Plan (PDP).
6
1
2
SPMS The Objectives
To ensure organizational effectiveness

3 by cascading institutional accountabilities to the
various levels of the organization anchored on
4 the establishment of a scientific basis for
performance targets and measures.
5
6
1
2
SPMS The Objectives
To link performance management

3
with other HR Systems using one
4 platform, such that only one basis is used in
performance evaluation, HR planning and
5 interventions, rewards and incentives, discipline
and personnel actions.
6
1
2
SPMS The Objectives
To improve organizational and individual

3 performance through a systematic
4 approach via an ongoing process of establishing
strategic performance objectives, measuring
5 performance, and collecting, analyzing, reviewing,
and reporting performance data;
6
1
2
SPMS The Objectives
To align individual and organizational

3
performance with the latter’s strategic goals
4 by putting premium on performance results of
the organization.
5
6
MANAGING
1
SYST
2
3 TH
4
ETHE MANAGEMENT TEAM & THE PMS CYCLE
5
6
1 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT TEAM
2 The Performance Management Team (PMT) will
spearhead the establishment and implementation of
3 the SPMS in the agency. The PMT shall be composed of
the following:
4 • Executive Official designated as Chairperson
• Highest Human Resource Management Officer
• Highest Human Resource Development Officer
5 • Highest Planning Officer
• Highest Finance Officer
• President of the accredited employee association
6
1 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT TEAM
2 Presently, the Performance Management Team (PMT) is composed
of the following designated personnel:
3 CHAIRPER ROBINSON B. PANUDA

Municipal Accountant
RESPONSIBILITIE
SON: S consultation
• Sets OF PMT meetings with all Heads
of Offices to discuss the office performance
ANITA S. LUMANOG
4 MEMBERS Human Resource Management Officer
commitment and rating system and tools.
• Ensures that office performance management
: AURORA S. HERBITO
targets, measures, and budget are aligned
with those of goals of the agency.
Municipal Planning and Development Coordinator
• Recommends approval of the office
5 ALEJANDRA A. MANTO
performance and rating system and tools.
ICO-Assistant Municipal Treasurer • Acts as appeals body and final arbiter.

• Identifies potential top performers for awards.
JONATHAN P. DELA CRUZ • Adopts its own internal rules, procedures,
6 President, SCMEU and strategies to carry out its responsibilities.

1 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
SYSTEM (PMS) CYCLE
2
Stage 1. Performance
Planning and Commitment
3 is done prior to the start of the
performance period where
heads of offices meet with the
staff and agree on the outputs
4 that should be accomplished
based on the goals and
objectives of the organization.
5
6
SYSTEM (PMS) CYCLE
2
Monitoring and Coaching
3 is done regularly during the
performance period by the
Heads of Agency, Planning
Office, Division and Office
4 Heads, and the individual. The
focus is creating an enabling
environment to improve team
5 performance and develop
individual potentials.
6
SYSTEM (PMS) CYCLE
2
Review and Evaluation
3 is done at regular intervals to
assess both the performance
of the individual and the office.
6
SYSTEM (PMS) CYCLE
2
Rewarding and
3 Development Planning
is based on the results of the
performance review and
evaluation when appropriate
4 developmental interventions
shall be made available to
specific employees.
5
6
1
MEASURHO
PERFO
2
WE W
ING
3
5
PERSONNEL PERFORMANCE MEASURES
6
GENERAL
1
CONCEPT
2
The SPMS focuses on measures of performance results that are
reviewable over the period of the implementation and provides a
3 scientific and verifiable basis in assessing organizational
performance and the collective performance of individuals in the
4 organization.
6
GENERAL
1
CONCEPT
2
It is a tool for managing performance in ways whereby work
accomplishments are monitored throughout the span of the
3 performance rating period, and not merely paid attention at the
end of such period when ratings are already determined.
4
6
GENERAL
1
CONCEPT
2 • Outputs are measured through
performance measures:
3
4
QUANT Number or Percentage of
accomplished task or workload
ITY
5 EFFECTIV Getting the right
things done
ENESS
6
TIMELI Meeting timeframe as
set in the work plan
FOLLOW
1
5
STANDA
THE
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS GUIDE
6
1 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS GUIDE
2 The Performance Standards Guide serves as the
yardstick in rating every accomplishment or output as
3 agreed upon by and between the work unit head as
rater and the individual employees as ratees.
4
The agreed office standards indicates the rating scale
for every expected output relative to the performance measures
5 which are in-line with the success indicators determined by both
the head of the work units and their respective employees
accordingly.
6
1 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS GUIDE
2 A numerical rating scale ranging from 1 to 5 - with 1 as the lowest
and 5 as the highest, shall be the basis in rating the outputs.
3 SAMPLE FILE
RATING EFFECTIVENESS STANDARD RATING TIMELINESS STANDARD
EXPECTED OUTPUT
(per output) (per output) (per output) (per output)
201 FILE 5 All Documents Completely Filed 5 Filed 5 days after receipt of validated appointment
4
4 Lacking 1 Document 4 Filed 10 days after receipt of validated appointment
3 Lacking 2 Documents 3 Filed 15 days after receipt of validated appointment
2 Lacking 3 Documents 2 Filed 20 days after receipt of validated appointment
1 Lacking more than 3 Documents 1 Filed 30 days or more after receipt of validated appointment
201 INDEX CARD 5 No Error 5 Prepared less than 30 minutes per index card
4 1-2 Errors 4 Prepared 30 minutes per index card
5
3 3 Errors 3 Prepared 1 hour per index card
2 4-5 Errors 2 Prepared 2 hours per index card
1 More than 5 Errors 1 Prepared more than 2 hours per index card
ABSTRACT OF BIDS 5 No Error 5 Prepared immediately after Opening of Canvass
4 4 Prepared 1-3 working days after Opening of Canvass
6
2 With Error 2 Prepared 6-7 working days after Opening of Canvass
1 1 Prepared more than 7 working days after Opening of Canvass
From the Office Performance Standard Guide of the MMO-Human Resource Management Section

RATING OF
1
OUTP
2
5
FORMS, MECHANISM AND COMPUTATIONS
6
1
2
SPMS Rating Forms
• Output Rating Sheet

3 • Monthly Performance Output Report
4 • Summary of Accomplishments
• Individual Performance Commitment & Review
5
• Quarterly Accomplishment Report
6 • Office Performance Commitment & Review
1
2
SPMS Rating Forms
4
To be Accomplished by Head of Office/
5
•Supervisor/Rater only Report
Quarterly Accomplishment
6 • Office Performance Commitment & Review
• Output Rating Sheet
1
MUNICIPALITY OF SANTA CRUZ DESCRIP

2 TION
MMO-Human Resource Management Section
• Most Basic Rating Form
OUTPUT RATING SHEET • Used to Monitor Output
3 Ratee’s Name: ______________________________________
• A Verifiable data and basis
Output: _____________________________________________
Date/Time Requested/Received: ___________________ The Rating Process
4 Date/Time Accomplished: __________________________
essentially begins
Date Submitted by Ratee to Rater: ________________
Rating: with the Output
5 Quantity: ______ Effectiveness: ______ Timeliness: _____
Remarks: ___________________________________________
Rating Sheet (ORS)
___________________________________________
Rater’s Signature/Date: ____________________________
6 Date Returned by Rater to Ratee: __________________
MECHANISM
1
The Rating of ORS basically follows four (4) General Steps:
2
INPUT Task at hand. Functions, responsibilities,
request, etc. that are expected to be done.
3
OUTPUT Performance. Perform and accomplish
the functions, responsibilities, request, etc.
4
5
ORS Filling-Up. Fill-up ORS accordingly.
6 RATING For Rating. Together with the ORS, submit

the accomplished document, report, etc. to
immediate supervisor for rating.
MECHANISM Sample No.1 Application for Leave
1
1 INPU Four (4) employees requested

2
3
applications for leave dated When done, she will fill
T June 15, 2014. ORS up the Output Rating

Sheet accordingly.
4
2 OUTP
UTEgal will prepare the
ALLAN EGAL
APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE
Allan 06/15/2023
5 documents as requested.
06/17/2023
06/17/2023
She accomplished it on June 17, 2023,
two (2) days after the requests.
6
MECHANISM Sample No.1 Application for Leave
1
4 RATI Rina Fe will submit the document to

2 the HRMO for review and signing
NG with the ORS attached. ALLAN EGAL

APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE
06/15/2023
06/17/2023
3 The HRMO will review the correctness and 06/17/2023
completeness of the documents submitted 4 5 3
and rate it accordingly based on the
4 Performance Standards Guide. 06/17/2023
06/17/2023
5 EXPECTED RATING
QUALITY
STANDARD
RATING TIME STANDARD
OUTPUT (per output) (per output) (per output)
(per output)
Application for 5 No Error 5 Acted immediately after request
6
Leave
4 1-2 Minor Error 4 Acted on the following working day after request
3 3 Minor Errors 3 Acted on the 2nd working day after request
2 4 Minor Errors 2 Acted on the 3rd working day after request
1 5 Minor Errors 1 Acted after 3rd working day after request
MECHANISM Sample No.2 Payroll (Job Order)
1
1 INPU Personnel hired on Job Order

2
3
(JO) Contract submitted When done, she will fill
T supporting documents for ORS up the Output Rating

payroll dated June 15, 2014. Sheet accordingly.
4
2 OUTP
UT will prepare the payroll
SALMAN SALIK
PAYROLL (JO) Dela Cruz, J., et.al.
Salman 06/15/2023
5 after submission of documents.

06/16/2023
06/16/2023
She accomplished it the following day,
June 16, 2014.
6
1
4 RATI Clovy will submit the document to

2 the HRMO/immediate supervisor for
review and assessment with the ORS
NG
SALMAN SALIK
attached. PAYROLL (JO) Dela Cruz, J., et.al.
06/15/2023
06/16/2023
3 The HRMO/immediate supervisor will review the
correctness and completeness of the document
06/16/2023
submitted and rate it accordingly based on the

Performance Standards Guide.
OUTP
4 UT immediate supervisor
The HRMO/
will return the document (output) to
Clovy for correction.
5
X There are errors in encoding. Clovy will correct the error
as directed/advised.
One (1) Name misspelled
6 One (1) Entry miscalculated
1
2 RATI She will return the corrected

document to the HRMO/ immediate
NG supervisor for review and assessment. SALMAN SALIK

PAYROLL (JO) Dela Cruz, J., et.al.
06/15/2023
06/16/2023
3 The HRMO will review the correctness and 06/16/2023
completeness of the document submitted 1 3 4
and rate it accordingly based on the
4 Performance Standards Guide. 06/16/2023
06/16/2023
5 EXPECTED RATING
QUALITY
STANDARD
(per output)
Payroll 5 No Error 5 Prepared within the day after submission of all supporting doc.
6
4 1 Error 4 Prepared 1-2 working days after submission of all supporting doc.
3 2 Errors 3 Prepared 3-5 working days after submission of all supporting doc.
1 More than 3 Errors 1 Prepared 9 working days after submission of all supporting doc.
MECHANISM Sample Output No.3 Issuance of
1 Certified Copy of Registered Document
1 INPU A client request for Issuance of

2
3
Certified Copy Of Registered When done, she will fill
T Documents at 9:00 am. ORS up the Output Rating

Sheet accordingly.
4
2
The Administrative Aide will:
OUTP Verify the requested document to Name of Ratee
UT the computer (CRIS) or the
Registry Books.
CERTIFIED COPY
9:00 am
5 Generate copy from the computer

9:30 am
9:31 am
or photocopy from the original
document.
6 Check the veracity of the data

contained in the document.
Accomplished it at 9:30 am.
MECHANISM Sample Output No.3 Issuance of
1 Certified Copy of Registered Document
4 RATI She will submit the document to the

2 MCR/ immediate supervisor for
review and assessment with the ORS
NG attached. Name of Ratee
CERTIFIED COPY
3 The MCR, before signing, will review 9:00 am

9:30 am
the correctness and completeness of 9:31 am
the document submitted and rate it
accordingly based on the 1 5 4
4 Performance Standards Guide.

06/16/2014
06/16/2014
5 EXPECTED RATING
QUALITY
STANDARD
(per output)
Certified Copies 5 No Error 5 Prepared certified document within 25 minutes after receipt
6 4
3
4
3
Prepared certified document within 30 minutes after receipt
Prepared certified document within 35 minutes after receipt
2 1 Minor Error 2 Prepared certified document within 40 minutes after receipt
1 1 Prepared certified document within 45 minutes and beyond
MECHANISM
1
After Rating, the rater will return the ORS to the ratee.
2 DESCRIP
TION
The Output Rating Sheet (ORS),
3 will be kept and consolidated weekly or at
GAAM LAO
ALLAF NEEG
R
RIINNAAIO F
E NE S
G
G AF A
O
O
M
M
RA
RA O
AO
L
LEOEAAVVEE
VE/1E 5/2001144
the end of the month for the
L IC
IN A
A T F N S
G A F M R
A O L E A
0V 6
APPPR PLRIICN AA TFIO
F
IOE
E
N G S A F
ORMO R
AO OLEAAE A0
V 6 E0551/2/2
/1
4014144 accomplishment of the Monthly
4
APPRLIIC N A T
FIOE N GS A
F FM
O M A L V0 76
E /1
/2 5 /2040
APPRLIIC N A T
I OE
F NG
TIO N GS A O R
A OL 0E 6
AV 0
V/1 6
E
7/2/1
/2 5 0/21 14 7/2014
AAPPRPL NAA
IIC
RILIC SFAFOM R OLE0EA 6/1/17
0 6E /150/2100461/1
477/2/2001144
APPPR NA T F
FEE
TIO NS SAF
G AM
ENGFORRLLE
OM R
A AO LE 0 A6/10
V
066E
6
7E
/1
/1
/2 5 0
/2 1
/21406
0
4 4614/1
1 Performance Output Report (MPOR)
AAPPRLIC
IC
LIN
IIC
NATF IO
IONNSSFO
06A6 V
06/1 /15/20
7/2 501 4/1
6/1 7/2/2001144
A TIO OR L0E06A 0 V
/1 7E
/1 0 /2 4016414
1401 /17 7/2 14
APPPPLLIC A T
ATION S F 6
060/1 /16 7/1
067/1/2501/25/2 /2
1 066/17/20010144
/1
A
P P LIC 0 7 /2 0 0 4 /2
A 066/1/17/201140646/1/177/20144
006/17/20006/1 /17/20114
5 06 7/20
Practically, it would be difficult to monitor

and verify daily/weekly outputs without
6 utilizing the ORS.
MECHANISM How to Consolidate?
1
Sample Output: Service Record Formula: Quantity x Rating
2 Formula:
Effectiveness: 2 xQuantity
5 = 10 x Rating
Timeliness: 3 x 5 = 15
1 Week
st 1x3=3
(Qty.- EFFECTIV (Qty.- TIMELINE

QUANTITY
3 Rating) ENESS Rating) SS
(2-5) 10
MONDAY 3 (1-3) 3 (3-5) 15
4 TUESDAY 5 (3-5)
(2-3)
15
6
(2-5)
(2-3)
10
6
(1-4) 4
WEDNESDAY 2 (2-5) 10 (2-4) 8
5 THURSDAY - - - - -
FRIDAY 1 (1-5) 5 (1-4) 4
6 Total Service Records

Accomplished in Week 1 11 49 47
No need to get the average yet.
1
Sample Output: Service Record It would be easier to accomplish the
2 Formula: Quantityratings
x Rating
2nd Week MPOR if you consolidate weekly
(Qty.- EFFECTIV (Qty.- TIMELINE

QUANTITY
3 Rating) ENESS Rating) SS
(2-5) 10
(3-4) 12
MONDAY 5 (1-4) 4 (2-5) 10
(2-3) 6
4 (5-5) 25
TUESDAY 12 (4-3) 12 (11-5) 55
(1-4) 4
(3-4) 12
5 WEDNESDAY 2 (1-5)
(1-4)
5
4
(2-5) 10
THURSDAY 6 (4-5) 20 (3-5) 15

6 (2-4) 8 (3-3) 9
FRIDAY 1 (1-3) 3 (1-2) 2
Total Service Records
Accomplished in Week 2 26 109 117
• Monthly Performance Output Report
1
Republic of the Philippines
Province of Davao del Sur
MUNICIPALITY OF SANTA CRUZ
DESCRIPT
2 MONTHLY PERFORMANCE OUTPUT REPORT
ION
Name : _________________________ Office/Division: ___________________________ Month: _____________________
• Consolidation
QUANTITY EFFECTIVENESS TIMELINESS of daily/weekly
EXPECTED OUTPUT WEEK WEEK WEEK
outputs
3
TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
1
2
3
CORE FUNCTIONS
The MPOR
4
1
2
3
4

may serve as
5
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
1
the Monthly

Accomplishment
5
2
3
4
5

Report

WEEK 1 WEEK 2 WEEK 3 WEEK 4 TOTAL
MAN DAY(S) LOST THRU ABSENCE
6
MAN HRS./MINUTES LOST THRU TARDINESS/UNDERTIME

OBSERVATION/REMARKS

CONFIRMED: Above entries are true & correct:

Rater Ratee
1
Sample Output: Service Record Fill up the MPOR accordingly with the
2 output ratings gathered per week
EFFECTIV TIMELINE
QUANTITY
ENESS SS
3 Week 1 11 49 47
Week 2 26 109 117
4
Week 3 40 176 174
Week 4 26 119 114
Week 5 19 84 88
QUANTITY EFFECTIVENESS TIMELINESS
5 EXPECTED OUTPUT
1
WEEK
2 3 4 5 TOTAL 1
WEEK
2 3 4 5 TOTAL 1
WEEK
2 3 4 5 TOTAL
CORE FUNCTIONS
1 Service Record 11 26 40 26 19 49 109 176 119 84 47 117 174 114 88
6 2 Leave Application
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
1 Payroll
2 Minutes of Meeting
1
Sample Output: Service Record Get the Total of all performance
2 measurement at the end of the month
3 EXPECTED OUTPUT
1
WEEK
2 3 4 5 TOTAL 1
WEEK
2 3 4 5 TOTAL 1
WEEK
2 3 4 5 TOTAL
CORE FUNCTIONS
1 Service Record 11 26 40 26 19 122 49 109 176 119 84 537 47 117 174 114 88 540
4 2 Leave Application
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
1 Payroll
5
COMPUTATION
Again, it would be easier to
Quantity 11 + 26 + 40 + 26 + 19 = 122 accomplish the MPOR if you
6 Effectiveness 49 + 109 + 176 + 119 + 84 = 537 consolidate ratings weekly
47 + 117 + 174 + 114 + 88 = 540
Timeliness
• Summary of Accomplishments
1
Republic of the Philippines
Province of Davao del Sur
2 MUNICIPALITY OF SANTA CRUZ
DESCRIPT SUMMARY OF ACCOMPLISHMENT
• ION
Consolidation
3
_________________________________
of all monthly Period
ratings Ratee's Name: ________________________________

Ratee's Position: ______________________________
Ratee's Work Station: __________________________
The ACCOMPLISHMENT
4 Summary
EXPECTED OUTPUT
QUALITY EFFECTIVENESS
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN TOTAL AVE. JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN TOTAL AVE. JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN TOTAL AVE.
TIMELINESS
consolidates 1
2
all the ratings 3
5
CORE FUNCTIONS
at the end of 1
the semester 2
3

4
5
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
6
1
2
3
4
5

1
Sample Output: Service Record Get the Total of all performance
2 measurement at the end of the semester
ACCOMPLISHMENT
EXPECTED OUTPUT QUANTITY EFFECTIVENESS TIMELINESS
3 CORE FUNCTIONS
1 Service Record 122 120 135 90 50 180 697 2 537 480 325 421 220 750 2733 3.92 540 555 290 410 185 850 2830 4.06
2 Leave Application 107 84 135 137 20 45 528 5 530 415 676 657 85 170 2527 4.78 537 410 672 678 90 186 2573 4.87
4 SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
1 Payroll 20 13 21 10 15 7 86 5 100 65 105 50 63 27 410 4.76 94 65 105 49 54 30 397 4.61
2 Minutes of Meeting 1 7 2 0 0 2 12 5 5 35 10 0 0 8 58 4.83 5 35 10 0 0 10 60 5
COMPUTATION
5
Quantity 122+ 120 + 135 + 90 + 50 + 180 = 697
Effectiveness 537+ 480 + 325 + 421 + 220 + 750 = 2733
6 Timeliness 540 + 555 + 290 + 410 + 185 + 850 = 2830
1
Sample Output: Service Record Get the Average of each performance
2 measures base on each total ratings
ACCOMPLISHMENT
3 CORE FUNCTIONS
1 Service Record 122 120 135 90 50 180 697 2 537 480 325 421 220 750 2733 3.92 540 555 290 410 185 850 2830 4.06
4 SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
1 Payroll 20 13 21 10 15 7 86 5 100 65 105 50 63 27 410 4.76 94 65 105 49 54 30 397 4.61
6
1
Sample Output: Service Record FORMULA: For Quantity
2 Accomplishment/Target x 100%
ACCOMPLISHMENT
3 CORE FUNCTIONS
1 Service Record 122 120 135 90 50 180 697 2 537 480 325 421 220 750 2733 3.92 540 555 290 410 185 850 2830 4.06
4 SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
1 Payroll 20 13 21 10 15 7 86 5 100 65 105 50 63 27 410 4.76 94 65 105 49 54 30 397 4.61
COMPUTATION Service Record Ratin Percentage of Actual

5 Target: 1068 g Accomplishment
Accomplishment: 697 5 130 percent or more than the set target
4 115 to 129 percent more than the set
6 697/1068 = 0.65 x 100% = 65% target
However, if the Target Quantity is Fixed, 3 Equal to the set target or 101 to 114
its rating shall be an automatic 5. percent more than the set target
1
Sample Output: Service Record FORMULA: For Effectiveness/Timeliness
2 Total Rating/Total Quantity
ACCOMPLISHMENT
3 CORE FUNCTIONS
1 Service Record 122 120 135 90 50 180 697 2 537 480 325 421 220 750 2733 3.92 540 555 290 410 185 850 2830 4.06
4 SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
1 Payroll 20 13 21 10 15 7 86 5 100 65 105 50 63 27 410 4.76 94 65 105 49 54 30 397 4.61
COMPUTATION Service Record Average Rating Equivalent Numerical Rating

5 Total Quantity: 697 (From Summary (To be reflected on the IPCR’s Actual
Total Effectiveness: 2733 MPOR) Accomplishment)
Total Timeliness: 2830 5.00 5
6 Effectiveness: 2733/697 = 3.92 4.00 - 4.99 4
Timeliness: 2830/697 = 4.06 3.00 - 3.99 3
2.00 - 2.99 2
1
Sample Output: Service Record FORMULA: For Effectiveness/Timeliness
2 Total Rating/Total Quantity
ACCOMPLISHMENT
3 CORE FUNCTIONS
1 Service Record 122 120 135 90 50 180 697 2 537 480 325 421 220 750 2733 3.92 540 555 290 410 185 850 2830 4.06
4 SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
1 Payroll 20 13 21 10 15 7 86 5 100 65 105 50 63 27 410 4.76 94 65 105 49 54 30 397 4.61
COMPUTATION Service Record Average Rating Equivalent Numerical Rating

5 Total Quantity: 697 (From Summary (To be reflected on the IPCR’s Actual
Total Effectiveness: 2733 MPOR) Accomplishment)
6 Effectiveness: 2733/697 = 3.92 4.00 - 4.99 4
Timeliness: 2830/697 = 4.06 3.00 - 3.99 3
2.00 - 2.99 2
• Individual Performance Commitment & Review
1
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (IPCR)
2
I, _________________________________________________ of the ______________________, Division of _____________________ commit to deliver and agree to be rated on the attainment of the
following targets in accordance with the indicated measures for the period _______________ to ________________ 20_____.

DESCRIPT Ratee
Date
• ION
Individual Reviewed by: Date: Approved by: Date:
3

Rating for the
Immediate Supervisor

Head of Office

given semester Success Indicators
Output Actual Accomplishments Rating Remarks
as targeted (Targets + Measures)
Q (1) E (2) T (3) A (4)

STRATEGIC PRIORITY NO:
4
Output No. 1:
The IPCR Output No. 2:

Total

shall be CORE FUNCTIONS:
Output No. 1:

accomplished Output No. 2:

Total

using the SUPPORT FUNCTIONS:
5 Summary as
Output No. 1:
Output No. 2:

Total

reference. Final Average Rating
Comments and Recommendations for Development Purposes
Discussed with Date Assessed by Date Final Rating by
6
I certify that I discussed my assessment
of the performance with the employee.

Employee Supervisor Head of Office
LEGEND: 1 - Quantity 2 - Effectiveness 3 - Timeliness 4 - Average

MECHANISM How to Accomplish the IPCR?
1 EXPECTED OUTPUT QUANTITY

ACCOMPLISHMENT
EFFECTIVENESS TIMELINESS
CORE FUNCTIONS
1 Service Record 122 120 135 90 50 180 697 2 537 480 325 421 220 750 2733 3.92 540 555 290 410 185 850 2830 4.06
2 2 Leave Application 107 84 135 137 20 45 528 5 530 415 676 657 85 170 2527 4.78 537 410 672 678 90 186 2573 4.87
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
1 Payroll 20 13 21 10 15 7 86 5 100 65 105 50 63 27 410 4.76 94 65 105 49 54 30 397 4.61
3
Success Indicators
Output
(Targets + Measures) Actual Accomplishments Rating Remarks
Q (1) E (2) T (3) A (4)
CORE FUNCTIONS
Service Record Prepared 1068 Service Record with no error
within 20 minutes upon request.
4 Leave Application Prepared 300 Leave Applications with 3 errors

on the 2nd working day after request.

Total
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS:
Payroll Prepared 30 Payrolls with 2 errors 3-5 working
days after submission of all supporting documents
Prepared 6 Minutes of Meeting with 2 revisions
5 days after the meeting.

Total
Final Average Rating
6 Get your Reviewed IPCR as agreed by you and your supervisor

during the target setting before the start of the semester.

ACCOMPLISHMENT
CORE FUNCTIONS
1 Service Record 122 120 135 90 50 180 697 2 537 480 325 421 220 750 2733 3.92 540 555 290 410 185 850 2830 4.06
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
1 Payroll 20 13 21 10 15 7 86 5 100 65 105 50 63 27 410 4.76 94 65 105 49 54 30 397 4.61
3
Success Indicators
Output
Q (1) E (2) T (3) A (4)
CORE FUNCTIONS
Service Record Prepared 1068 Service Record with no error
within 20 minutes upon request.


Total
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS:

Total
6 Core Function
Output: Service Record
Success Indicator: Prepared 1068 Service Record with no error within 20 minutes upon request.
1 EXPECTED EXPECTED RATING

OUTPUTOUTPUT(per output)
QUALITY STANDARD
QUANTITY
(per output)
ACCOMPLISHMENT
RATING
(per output) EFFECTIVENESS
TIME STANDARD
(per output)TIMELINESS
Service Record
CORE FUNCTIONS 5 No Error 5 Prepared /issued immediately upon request
• Prepared/Issued
1 Service Record 4 122 120 135 90 50 180 697 2 537 4480 325 421
Prepared
220 750 /issued
2733 3.92within 15 290
540 555 minutes upon
410 185 850request
2830 4.06
3 3 Prepared /issued within 20 minutes upon request
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
1 Payroll 2 20 With
13 21Error
10 15 7 86 5 100 2 65 105 50Prepared
63 27 /issued
410 4.76within
94 3065 minutes
105 49 upon
54 30request
397 4.61
2 Minutes of Meeting 1 1 7 2 0 0 2 12 5 5 1 35 10 0Prepared/issued
0 8 58 more
4.83 5 than
35 30
10 minutes
0 0 upon request
10 60 5
3
Success Indicators
Output
Q (1) E (2) T (3) A (4)
CORE FUNCTIONS
Service Record Prepared 1068 Service Record with no error Prepared 697 Service Records with error 2 3 4
within 20 minutes upon request. within 20 minutes upon request.


Total
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS:

Total
6 Actual Accomplishment
Prepared 697 Service Records with error within 20 minutes upon request
Based on the office’s Performance Standard Guide

ACCOMPLISHMENT
CORE FUNCTIONS
1 Service Record 122 120 135 90 50 180 697 2 537 480 325 421 220 750 2733 3.92 540 555 290 410 185 850 2830 4.06
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
1 Payroll 20 13 21 10 15 7 86 5 100 65 105 50 63 27 410 4.76 94 65 105 49 54 30 397 4.61
3
Success Indicators
Output
Q (1) E (2) T (3) A (4)
CORE FUNCTIONS


Total
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS:

Total
6 Core Function
Output: Leave Application
Success Indicator: Prepared 300 Leave Applications with 3 errors on the 2nd working day after request.

QUALITY STANDARD
QUANTITY
(per output)
ACCOMPLISHMENT
RATING
(per output) EFFECTIVENESS (per output)TIMELINESS
TIME STANDARD
LeaveCORE
Application
FUNCTIONS 5 No Error 5 Prepared immediately after request
1 Service Record 4 1-2 Minor
122 120 135 90Error
50 180 697 2 537 4480 325 421
Prepared
220 750on the 3.92
2733 following working
540 555 day185
290 410 after
850request
2830 4.06
2 2 Leave Application 107 84 135 137 20 45 528 5 530 415 676 657 85 170 2527 4.78 nd 537 410 672 678 90 186 2573 4.87
3 3 Minor Errors 3 Prepared on the 2 working day after request
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
1 Payroll 2 20 413Minor
21 Errors
10 15 7 86 5 100 2 65 105 Prepared
50 63 27 on
410the4.76
3rd 94
working day49after
65 105 54 request
30 397 4.61
2 Minutes of Meeting 1 1 57Minor
2 Errors
0 0 2 12 5 5 1 35 10 Prepared
0 0 8 after 3 working
58 4.83
rd 5 35 day
10 after
0 request
0 10 60 5
3
Success Indicators
Output
Q (1) E (2) T (3) A (4)
CORE FUNCTIONS

Prepared 528 Leave Applications with 1-2
errors on the following working day.
5 4 4
Total
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS:

Total
Prepared 528 Leave Applications with 1-2 errors on the following working day.

ACCOMPLISHMENT
CORE FUNCTIONS
1 Service Record 122 120 135 90 50 180 697 2 537 480 325 421 220 750 2733 3.92 540 555 290 410 185 850 2830 4.06
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
1 Payroll 20 13 21 10 15 7 86 5 100 65 105 50 63 27 410 4.76 94 65 105 49 54 30 397 4.61
3
Success Indicators
Output
Q (1) E (2) T (3) A (4)
CORE FUNCTIONS

Prepared 528 Leave Applications with 1-2
errors on the following working day.
5 4 4
Total
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS:

Total
6 Support Function
Output: Payroll
Success Indicator: Prepared 30 Payrolls with 2 errors 3-5 working days after submission of all supporting documents
1 EXPECTED OUTPUT RATING

EXPECTED OUTPUT
(per output)
QUALITY STANDARD
QUANTITY
(per output) (per output)
RATING ACCOMPLISHMENT
EFFECTIVENESS
TIME STANDARD
(per output) TIMELINESS
Payroll
CORE FUNCTIONS 5 No Error 5 Prepared within the day after submission of all supporting doc.
1 Service Record 4 1122Error
120 135 90 50 180 697 2 4537 Prepared
480 325 1-2750
421 220 working
2733days
3.92 after
540 submission of all
555 290 410 185supporting
850 2830 doc.
4.06
2 2 Leave Application 107 84 135 137 20 45 528 5 415 676 657 85 170 2527 4.78 537 410 672 678 90 186 2573 4.87
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
1 Payroll 2 320Errors
13 21 10 15 7 86 5 2100 65 Prepared
105 50 636-8 working
27 410 days
4.76 after
94 submission
65 105 49of all
54supporting
30 397 doc.
4.61
2 Minutes of Meeting 1 More
1 7 than
2 3 Errors
0 0 2 12 5 15 35 Prepared
10 0 09 working
8 58 days after
4.83 5 submission
35 10 of 0 all0supporting
10 60 doc.5
3
Success Indicators
Output
Q (1) E (2) T (3) A (4)
CORE FUNCTIONS
4 Leave Application Prepared 300 Leave Applications with 3 errors Prepared 528 Leave Applications with 1-2
on the 2nd working day after request. errors on the following working day.
5 4 4
Total
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS:
Payroll Prepared 30 Payrolls with 2 errors 3-5 working Prepared 86 Payrolls with 1 error 1-2 working 5 4 4
days after submission of all supporting documents day after submission of all supporting doc..

Total
Prepared 86 Payrolls with 1 error 1-2 working day after submission of all supporting doc.

ACCOMPLISHMENT
CORE FUNCTIONS
1 Service Record 122 120 135 90 50 180 697 2 537 480 325 421 220 750 2733 3.92 540 555 290 410 185 850 2830 4.06
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
1 Payroll 20 13 21 10 15 7 86 5 100 65 105 50 63 27 410 4.76 94 65 105 49 54 30 397 4.61
3
Success Indicators
Output
Q (1) E (2) T (3) A (4)
CORE FUNCTIONS
5 4 4
Total
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS:
days after submission of all supporting documents day after submission of all supporting doc.

Total
6 Support Function
Output: Minutes of Meeting
Success Indicator: Prepared 6 Minutes of Meeting with 2 revisions 5 days after the meeting.

QUALITY STANDARD
QUANTITY
(per output)
ACCOMPLISHMENT
RATING
(per output) EFFECTIVENESS
TIME STANDARD
(per output)TIMELINESS
Minutes of FUNCTIONS
CORE Meeting 5 No Revision 5 Prepared 1-2 working days after the meeting
1 Service Record 4 1 Revision
122 120 135 90 50 180 697 2 537 4480 325 421
Prepared
220 750 3-4
2733working
3.92 540days
555 after the185
290 410 meeting
850 2830 4.06
2 2 Leave Application 3 107 84 135 137 20 45

2 Revisions 528 5 530 3415 676 657 85 170 2527 4.78 537 410 672 678 90
Prepared 5 working days after the meeting186 2573 4.87
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
1 Payroll
2 20
3 Revisions 15 7 86
13 21 10 5
2 Prepared 6-7 working days after the meeting
100 65 105 50 63 27 410 4.76 94 65 105 49 54 30 397 4.61
2 Minutes of Meeting 1 1 More
7 2 than
0 3 Revisions
0 2 12 5 5 1 35 10 0Prepared
0 8 more than 75 working
58 4.83 35 10 days
0 after
0 10 the meeting
60 5
3
Success Indicators
Output
Q (1) E (2) T (3) A (4)
CORE FUNCTIONS
5 4 4
Total
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS:
Prepared 6 Minutes of Meeting with 2 revisions Prepared 12 Minutes of Meeting with 1
5 days after the meeting. revision 1-2 working days after the meeting.
5 4 5
Total
Prepared 12 Minutes of Meeting with 1 revision 1-2 working days after the meeting.
1
Output

Success Indicators
(Targets + Measures)

Actual Accomplishments Rating
Q (1) E (2) T (3) A (4)
Remarks
CORE FUNCTIONS
5 4 4
Total
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS:
Prepared 6 Minutes of Meeting with 2 revisions Prepared 12 Minutes of Meeting with 1 5 4 5
Total
4
OVERALL RATING PERCENTAGE
If anDISTRIBUTION
Corresponding Percentages employee has outputs in all three categories
5 were assigned to arrive at the as reflected on the IPCR:
Final Rating in a given semester.
• Strategic Priorities - 45%
• Core Functions - 45%
6 • Support Functions - 10%
Total - 100%

1
Output

Success Indicators

Q (1) E (2) T (3) A (4)
Remarks
CORE FUNCTIONS
5 4 4
Total
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS:
Total
4
If anDISTRIBUTION
Corresponding Percentages employee has outputs only in two out of
5 were assigned to arrive at the three categories, as reflected on the IPCR:
6 Total - 100%

1
Output

Success Indicators

Q (1) E (2) T (3) A (4)
Remarks
CORE FUNCTIONS
5 4 4
Total
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS:
Total
4
If anDISTRIBUTION
• Support Functions - 20%
6 Total - 100%
1
Output

Success Indicators

Q (1) E (2) T (3) A (4)
Remarks
CORE FUNCTIONS
5 4 4
Total
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS:
Total
4
If anDISTRIBUTION
• Support Functions - 20%
6 Total - 100%
1
Output

Success Indicators

Q (1) E (2) T (3) A (4)
Remarks
CORE FUNCTIONS
5 4 4
Total
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS:
Total
4
If anDISTRIBUTION
Corresponding Percentages employee has outputs only in one out of
6 • Support Functions - 100%
1
Output

Success Indicators

Q (1) E (2) T (3) A (4)
Remarks
CORE FUNCTIONS
Service Record Prepared 1068 Service Record with no error Prepared 697 Service Records with error 2 3 4 3
5 4 4 4.33
Total 2.93
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS:
Total
4
OVERALL RATING Getting the Average Rating
Core Functions – 80% Core Functions:
5 Support Functions – 20% Service Record: 2 + 3 + 4 = 9/3 =3
(See Percentage Distribution) Leave Application: 5 + 4 + 4 = 13/3 = 4.33
---------
6 7.33/2 = 3.665 x 80%
= 2.93
1
Output

Success Indicators

Q (1) E (2) T (3) A (4)
Remarks
CORE FUNCTIONS
5 4 4 4.33
Total 2.93
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS:
Payroll Prepared 30 Payrolls with 2 errors 3-5 working Prepared 86 Payrolls with 1 error 1-2 working 5 4 4 4.33
Prepared 6 Minutes of Meeting with 2 revisions Prepared 12 Minutes of Meeting with 1 5 4 5 4.67
Total .90
4
OVERALL RATING Getting the Average Rating
Core Functions – 80% Support Functions:
5 Support Functions – 20% Payroll: 5 + 4 + 4 = 13/3 = 4.33
(See Percentage Distribution) Minutes: 5 + 4 + 5 = 14/3 = 4.67
---------
6 9/2 = 4.5 x 20%
= .90
1
Output

Success Indicators

Q (1) E (2) T (3) A (4)
Remarks
CORE FUNCTIONS
5 4 4 4.33
Total 2.93
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS:
Payroll Prepared 30 Payrolls with 2 errors 3-5 working Prepared 86 Payrolls with 1 error 1-2 working 5 4 4 4.33
Prepared 6 Minutes of Meeting with 2 revisions Prepared 12 Minutes of Meeting with 1 5 4 5 4.67
Total .90
Final Average Rating 3.83
4
OVERALL RATING Final Average Rating Range Adjectival Rating
4.51-5.00 Outstanding (O)
Core Functions – 80% 2.93 + .90 3.51-4.50 Very Satisfactory (VS)
5 Support Functions – 20%
=3.83 2.51-3.50 Satisfactory (S)
(See Percentage Distribution) 1.51-2.50 Unsatisfactory (US)
1.00-1.50 Poor (P)
6
The employee attained a rating of Very Satisfactory
WORKSH
SP
1
2
O
OP
N
3
5
STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
6
W WORKSHOP INSTRUCTION
O Assuming that it is the end of the semester and
R the rating period, perform the following tasks,
accordingly:
K • Accomplish the MPOR for the month of June using the
S rated ORS provided. (Please use your mobile phone calendars)
• Accomplish the Summary of Accomplishments using the
H MPOR provided including the accomplished MPOR for June.
• Accomplish the IPCR provided.
O • Find the Final Average and Adjectival Rating of the IPCR.
P We’ll Check and Process after accomplishing all the tasks.

W
O
R
K
S
H
O
P
1
W Republic of the Philippines
O
Province of the Davao del Sur
MONTHLY PERFORMANCE OUTPUT REPORT

R Name: JUAN B. DELA CRUZ Office/Division: MMO Month: JUNE 2014
K EXPECTED OUTPUT
QUANTITY
WEEK
EFFECTIVENESS
WEEK
TIMELINESS
WEEK
S CORE FUNCTIONS
1 Plans, Programs and Project Proposal
1
1
2 3 4 5 TOTAL
1

1
4
2 3 4 5 TOTAL
4

1
4
2 3 4 5 TOTAL
H CORE FUNCTIONS
1 Abstract of Bids
1 1
1
2
1
3 4
5
7
5
3 3
5
6
5
O
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
1 Accomplished Daily Time Record (DTR) 1 1 5 5 5 5
2 Acknowledgment Letter 5 2 1 1 9 25 8 4 4 41 20 8 4 4 36
P
3 Communications (Reply) 1 1 3 3 5 5
W QUANTITY EFFECTIVENESS TIMELINESS
O
1 2 3 4 5 TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 TOTAL 1 2 3 4 5 TOTAL
CORE FUNCTIONS
1 Plans, Programs and Project Proposal 1 4 4
R CORE FUNCTIONS
1 Abstract of Bids
1 1
1
3 4
5
3 3
5
K SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
1 Accomplished Daily Time Record (DTR)
2 Acknowledgment Letter
1
5 2 1 1
5
25 8 4 4
5
20 8 4 4
S
3 Communications (Reply) 1 3 5
H
O
P
W
O
CORE FUNCTIONS
CORE FUNCTIONS
1 Abstract of Bids 1 1 3 4 3 3
R 2 Minutes of Meeting
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
1 Accomplished Daily Time Record (DTR) 1
1
5
5
5
5
K 2 Acknowledgment Letter
3 Communications (Reply)
5
1
2 1 1 25
3
8 4 4 20
5
8 4 4
S
H PRO
B . DEL
JUAN POSAL
JECT P
RO
A CRU
Z
JUAN
ABSTRA
B . DEL
CT OF B
IDS
A CRU
Z
14
06/10/20 /10/2014
JUAN
ABSTRA
B . DEL
CT OF B
IDS
A CRU
Z
14
06/26/20 /26/2014
O
4
06/4/201 /4/2014 06 06
06 3 3
4 3 4
4 1 1
1
P
W
O
CORE FUNCTIONS
CORE FUNCTIONS
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
1
5
5
5
5
5
1
2 1 1 25
3
8 4 4 20
5
8 4 4
S
H JUAN
MINUTE
B . DEL
S OF M
EE T
A CRU
ING
Z
JUAN
ACCOM
B . DEL
PLISHE
A CRU
D DTR
4
Z
06/4/201 /4/2014
JUAN
COMMU
NICATIO
N (R
A CRU
B . DEL PLY)
E
4
Z
06/26/201 /26/2014
O
14
06/30/20 /30/2014 06 06
06 5 5
5 5 3
5 1 1
1
P
W
O
CORE FUNCTIONS
CORE FUNCTIONS
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
1
5
5
5
5
5
1
2 1 1 25
3
8 4 4 20
5
8 4 4
S
H JUAN
ACKNO
WLEDG
ME NT
A CRU
B . DEL LETTER
Z
JUAN
ACKNO
WLEDG
MENT
A CRU
14
Z
B . DEL LETTER
06/17/20 /17/2014
JUAN
ACKNO
WLEDG
MENT
A CRU
Z
B . DEL LETTER
14
06/26/20 /26/2014
JUAN
ACKNO
WLEDG
MENT
A CRU
Z
B . DEL LETTER
14
06/30/20 /30/2014
O
4
06/9/201 /9/2014 06 06 06
06 4 4 4
4 4 4 4
5 2 1 1
5
P
W
O
CORE FUNCTIONS
1 Plans, Programs and Project Proposal 1 1 4 4 4 4
CORE FUNCTIONS
1 Abstract of Bids 1 1 2 3 4 7 3 3 6
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
1 1
1 5
5 5
5 5
5 5
5
1
2 1 1 9
1
25
3
8 4 4 41
3
20
5
8 4 4 36
5
S
H
RU Z
. DE LA C RU Z
JUA NB ELsACC UZ
GET THE TOTAL of all

B . Did R
JU A N
trAacNctBtoB.o. fDB L A
E s CRUZ
AbJstrU Eid
fDBid LA RUZ
s CR
AbbsJUstrU AaN t . fB
o DBELsA 6/2Z0414
aN c B
. fDid id
E s 0606
A C /2 U 0106/26/2014
A sJ
Ab JUtr AaN
ActBo f B
L
C /2
R 6U/2Z
2Z014 6/20414
b s tra c tB o
f . BD E
id L
s A 06
C /2
R 6/
U 14 06/2/2 01
AbsJtrU
aA c NtBo . D L A
E s06 014 /26/
/2 6/ 2 0 06/ 26 14
2 0
O
A JUA t of Bid06/26/214 /2014
N 06
Abstract of Bids06/26/6/20214
0 06/26 4
Abstrac
performance measurement
1
06/26/20
06/2/2014 /26/2014
6 06/2 06 14
06/26/20
P using simple addition

W Republic of the Philippines
O Province of Davao del Sur

R
SUMMARY OF ACCOMPLISHMENT
JANUARY-JUNE 2014
Period
Ratee’s Name: JUAN B. DELA CRUZ
K Ratee’s Position: Administrative Assistant

Ratee’s Work Station: MMO
S
ACCOMPLISHMENT
CORE FUNCTIONS
H 1 Plans, Prog. and Proj. Proposal

CORE FUNCTIONS
1 Abstract of Bids
1
4 1
1
3 2
1
2
3
12
5
4
4
17 5
4
14 10
4
7
12 4
53 4.42 15
3
4
4
13 9
4
6
11 3.67
47 3.92
O 2 Minutes of Meeting
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
1 Accomplished DTR
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
6
3
5
4
5
4
5
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
27
30
4.5
5
4
5
3
5
4
3
5
1
5
5
5
5
26 4.33
24 4
P
2 Acknowledgment Letter 22 18 5 22 22 9 98 5 102 83 23 93 92 41 434 4.43 103 85 25 84 88 36 421 4.3
3 Communications (Reply) 3 2 2 3 2 1 13 5 13 7 10 13 9 3 55 4.23 13 8 10 15 10 5 61 4.69
W ACCOMPLISHMENT
O
CORE FUNCTIONS
R
1 Plans, Prog. and Proj. Proposal 1 1 1 3 5 4 4 4 12 4 3 4 4 11 3.67
CORE FUNCTIONS
1 Abstract of Bids 4 1 3 2 2 12 4 17 5 14 10 7 53 4.42 15 4 13 9 6 47 3.92
K
2 Minutes of Meeting 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 27 4.5 4 3 4 5 5 5 26 4.33
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
1 Accomplished DTR 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 30 5 5 5 3 1 5 5 24 4
2 FORMULA:Letter
Acknowledgment For Quantity
22 18 5 22 22 9 98 5 102 83 23 93 92 41 434 4.43 103 85 25 84 88 36 421 4.3
S Accomplishment/Target x 100%
3 Communications (Reply) 3 2 2 3 2 1 13 5 13 7 10 13
Ratin
9 3 55 4.23 13 8 10
Percentage of Actual
15 10 5 61 4.69
H COMPUTATION Plans, Prog. & Proj. Proposals

Target: 1
g
5
Accomplishment
130 percent or more than the set
O Accomplishment: 3
4
target
115 to 129 percent more than the set
3/1 = 3 x 100% = 300%
P
target
3 Equal to the set target or 101 to 114
percent more than the set target
ACCOMPLISHMENT
W EXPECTED OUTPUT
CORE FUNCTIONS
O 1 Plans, Prog. and Proj. Proposal

CORE FUNCTIONS
1 Abstract of Bids
1
4 1
1
3 2
1
2
3
12
5
4
4
17 5
4
14 10
4
7
12 4
53 4.42 15
3
4
4
13 9
4
6
11 3.67
47 3.92
R
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
K
FORMULA: For Quantity

Ratin Percentage of Actual
H COMPUTATION Abstract of Bids
Target: 10
g
5
Accomplishment
O Accomplishment: 12
4
target
12/10 = 1.2 x 100% = 120%
P
target
ACCOMPLISHMENT
W EXPECTED OUTPUT
CORE FUNCTIONS

CORE FUNCTIONS
1 Abstract of Bids
1
4 1
1
3 2
1
2
3
12
5
4
4
17 5
4
14 10
4
7
12 4
53 4.42 15
3
4
4
13 9
4
6
11 3.67
47 3.92
R
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
K

H COMPUTATION Minutes of Meeting
Target: 6
g
5
Accomplishment
O Accomplishment: 6
4
target
6/6 = 1 x 100% = 100%
P
target
ACCOMPLISHMENT
W EXPECTED OUTPUT
CORE FUNCTIONS

CORE FUNCTIONS
1 Abstract of Bids
1
4 1
1
3 2
1
2
3
12
5
4
4
17 5
4
14 10
4
7
12 4
53 4.42 15
3
4
4
13 9
4
6
11 3.67
47 3.92
R
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
K

H COMPUTATION Accomplished DTR
Target: 6
g
5
Accomplishment
O Accomplishment: 6
4
target
6/6 = 1 x 100% = 100%
P
target
If the Target Quantity is Fixed, its rating 3 Equal to the set target or 101 to 114
shall be an automatic 5. percent more than the set target
ACCOMPLISHMENT
W EXPECTED OUTPUT
CORE FUNCTIONS

CORE FUNCTIONS
1 Abstract of Bids
1
4 1
1
3 2
1
2
3
12
5
4
4
17 5
4
14 10
4
7
12 4
53 4.42 15
3
4
4
13 9
4
6
11 3.67
47 3.92
R
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
K

Target: 50
g
5
Accomplishment
4
target
98/50 = 1.96 x 100% = 196%
P
target
ACCOMPLISHMENT
W EXPECTED OUTPUT
CORE FUNCTIONS

CORE FUNCTIONS
1 Abstract of Bids
1
4 1
1
3 2
1
2
3
12
5
4
4
17 5
4
14 10
4
7
12 4
53 4.42 15
3
4
4
13 9
4
6
11 3.67
47 3.92
R
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
K

Target: 10
g
5
Accomplishment
4
target
13/10 = 1.3 x 100% = 130%
P
target
ACCOMPLISHMENT
W EXPECTED OUTPUT
CORE FUNCTIONS

CORE FUNCTIONS
1 Abstract of Bids
1
4 1
1
3 2
1
2
3
12
5
4
4
17 5
4
14 10
4
7
12 4
53 4.42 15
3
4
4
13 9
4
6
11 3.67
47 3.92
R
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
K
FORMULA: For Effectiveness/Timeliness Average Equivalent Numerical

S Total Rating/Total Quantity Rating Rating
(From (To be reflected on the
H COMPUTATION Plans, Prog. & Proj. Poposal
Total Quantity: 3
Summary
MPOR)
IPCR’s Actual
Accomplishment)
O
Total Effectiveness: 12
4.00 - 4.99 4
P Effectiveness: 12/3 = 4
Timeliness: 11/3 = 3.67
3.00 - 3.99
2.00 - 2.99
3
2
ACCOMPLISHMENT
W EXPECTED OUTPUT
CORE FUNCTIONS

CORE FUNCTIONS
1 Abstract of Bids
1
4 1
1
3 2
1
2
3
12
5
4
4
17 5
4
14 10
4
7
12 4
53 4.42 15
3
4
4
13 9
4
6
11 3.67
47 3.92
R
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
K

H COMPUTATION Abstract of Bids
Total Quantity: 12
Summary
MPOR)
IPCR’s Actual
Accomplishment)
O
4.00 - 4.99 4
P Effectiveness: 53/12 = 4.42
3.00 - 3.99
2.00 - 2.99
3
2
ACCOMPLISHMENT
W EXPECTED OUTPUT
CORE FUNCTIONS

CORE FUNCTIONS
1 Abstract of Bids
1
4 1
1
3 2
1
2
3
12
5
4
4
17 5
4
14 10
4
7
12 4
53 4.42 15
3
4
4
13 9
4
6
11 3.67
47 3.92
R
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
K

H COMPUTATION Minutes of Meeting
Total Quantity: 6
Summary
MPOR)
IPCR’s Actual
Accomplishment)
O
4.00 - 4.99 4
3.00 - 3.99
2.00 - 2.99
3
2
ACCOMPLISHMENT
W EXPECTED OUTPUT
CORE FUNCTIONS

CORE FUNCTIONS
1 Abstract of Bids
1
4 1
1
3 2
1
2
3
12
5
4
4
17 5
4
14 10
4
7
12 4
53 4.42 15
3
4
4
13 9
4
6
11 3.67
47 3.92
R
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
K

Total Quantity: 6
Summary
MPOR)
IPCR’s Actual
Accomplishment)
O
4.00 - 4.99 4
P Effectiveness: 30/6 = 5
Timeliness: 24/6 = 4
3.00 - 3.99
2.00 - 2.99
3
2
ACCOMPLISHMENT
W EXPECTED OUTPUT
CORE FUNCTIONS

CORE FUNCTIONS
1 Abstract of Bids
1
4 1
1
3 2
1
2
3
12
5
4
4
17 5
4
14 10
4
7
12 4
53 4.42 15
3
4
4
13 9
4
6
11 3.67
47 3.92
R
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
K

H COMPUTATION Acknowledgment Letter
Total Quantity: 98
Summary
MPOR)
IPCR’s Actual
Accomplishment)
O
4.00 - 4.99 4
3.00 - 3.99
2.00 - 2.99
3
2
ACCOMPLISHMENT
W EXPECTED OUTPUT
CORE FUNCTIONS

CORE FUNCTIONS
1 Abstract of Bids
1
4 1
1
3 2
1
2
3
12
5
4
4
17 5
4
14 10
4
7
12 4
53 4.42 15
3
4
4
13 9
4
6
11 3.67
47 3.92
R
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS
K

Total Quantity: 13
Summary
MPOR)
IPCR’s Actual
Accomplishment)
O
4.00 - 4.99 4
3.00 - 3.99
2.00 - 2.99
3
2
Ratee: JUAN B. DELA CRUZ
W
Date:
Reviewed by: Date: Approved by: Date:
PEDRO I. SANTIAGO
O
Head of Office
Success Indicators
Output Actual Accomplishments Rating
Q (1) E (2) T (3) A (4)
R STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
1. Plans, Prog. and Proj. Proposal

Submitted 1 Proposal with 2 revisions 5
working days after approval of the budget.

Submitted 3 Proposals with 1 revision 3-4
working days after approval of the budget.

Total
5

4

3

4

1.80

K CORE FUNCTIONS:
1. Abstract of Bids

Prepared 10 Abstract of Bids with no error 4-5
working days after Opening of Canvass.

Prepared 12 Abstract of Bids with no error
4-5 working days after Opening of Canvass.

4

4

3

3.67

S 2. Minutes of Meeting Prepared 6 Minutes with 2 revisions 5 working Prepared 6 Minutes with 1 revision 3-4 3 4 4 3.67
days after the meeting. working days after the meeting.

Total 1.65
H
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS:
1. Accomplished DTR Submitted 6 DTR with no revision 6 working Submitted 6 DTR with no revision 4-5 working 5 5 4 4.67
days after the end of the month. days after the end of the month.

O
2. Acknowledgment Letter Prepared 50 Letters with no error within 3 Prepared 98 Letters with 1 error within 2 5 4 4 4.33
working days after instruction. working days after instruction.

3. Communications (Reply) Prepared 10 Communications with 2 revisions Prepared 13 Communications with 1 revision 5 4 4 4.33
P
1-14 working days after instruction. 6-10 working days after instruction.
Total 0.44
Success Indicators
W
Q (1) E (2) T (3) A (4)
1. Plans, Prog. and Proj. Proposal Submitted 1 Proposal with 2 revisions 5 Submitted 3 Proposals with 1 revision 3-4 5 4 3 4
O
working days after approval of the budget. working days after approval of the budget.
Total 1.80
CORE FUNCTIONS:
1. Abstract of Bids Prepared 10 Abstract of Bids with no error 4-5 Prepared 12 Abstract of Bids with no error 4 4 3 3.67
R
working days after Opening of Canvass. 4-5 working days after Opening of Canvass.

2. Minutes of Meeting Prepared 6 Minutes with 2 revisions 5 working Prepared 6 Minutes with 1 revision 3-4 3 4 4 3.67
K

Total 1.65
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS:
S

H

Total 0.44
O OVERALL RATING
Strategic Priorities – 45%
Strategic Priorities:
P Core Functions – 45% Plans, Program & Project Proposal: 4 x 45%
Support Functions – 10% 5 + 4 + 3 = 12/3 = 4 = 1.80
Success Indicators
W
Q (1) E (2) T (3) A (4)
O
Total 1.80
CORE FUNCTIONS:
1. Abstract of Bids Prepared 10 QUALITY
Abstract of Bids with no error 4-5 Prepared 12 Abstract of Bids with no error 4 4 3 3.67
R
EXPECTED OUTPUT RATING RATING TIME STANDARD
working
(per STANDARD
output) days after Opening of Canvass. (per output)
(per output)
(per output)

K
Plans, Programs and 5 after the
days Nomeeting.
Revisions 5 working
Submitted
days after1-2
the working
meeting. days after approval of the budget

Project Proposal 4 With 1 Revision 4 Submitted 3-4 working days after approval of the budget

3 With 2 Revisions 3 Submitted 5 working days after Total approval
of the
budget 1.65
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS:
S
1. Accomplished DTR 2
Submitted With
6 DTR3with
Revisions
no revision 6 working 2 Submitted
Submitted 10 working
6 DTR with days
no revision 4-5after approval
working 5
of5the budget
4 4.67
1 after the
days More
endthan 3 month.
of the Revisions 1 days after
Submitted
the end15of or
themore working days after approval
month. of the budget

H

3. Communications (Reply)
working days after instruction.


Prepared 10 Communications with 2 revisions Prepared 13 Communications with 1 revision 5

4

4

4.33
O
Total 0.44

Actual Accomplishment Final Average Rating 3.89
P
Plans, Program and Project Proposal
Submitted 3 Proposals with 1 revision 3-4 working days after approval of the budget.
Based on the Performance Standard Guide
Success Indicators
W
Q (1) E (2) T (3) A (4)
O
Total 1.80
CORE FUNCTIONS:
R

K

Total 1.65
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS:
S

H

Total 0.44
O OVERALL RATING
Core Functions: 3.67 + 3.67 = 7.34
P Core Functions – 45%
Support Functions – 10%
Abstract: 4 + 4 + 3 = 11/3 = 3.67
Minutes: 3 + 4 + 4 = 11/3 = 3.67
7.34/2 = 3.67 x 45%
= 1.65
Success Indicators
W
Q (1) E (2) T (3) A (4)
O
Total 1.80
CORE FUNCTIONS:
R

2. Minutes of Meeting


Prepared 6 Minutes with 2 revisions 5 working Prepared 6 Minutes with 1 revision 3-4 3

4

4

3.67

K

QUALITY Total 1.65
EXPECTED
SUPPORT OUTPUT
FUNCTIONS:
RATING

RATING
TIME STANDARD
STANDARD
S
(per output) (per output) (per output)
1. Accomplished DTR Submitted 6 DTR with (per no revision 6 working
output) Submitted 6 DTR with no revision 4-5 working 5 5 4 4.67
Abstract of Bids days
5 after the
Noend of the month.
Error 5 days after the end
Prepared of the month.
immediately after Opening of Canvass

4 With Error 4 Prepared 1-3 working days after Opening of Canvass
H 3
working days after instruction. 3 workingPrepared 4-5
days after working days after Opening
instruction. of Canvass


3. Communications (Reply) Prepared
1 10 Communications with 2 revisions
1 Prepared 13 Communications with 1 revision 5 4
Prepared more than 7 working days after Opening of Canvass 4 4.33
O
Total 0.44

P
Abstract of Bids
Prepared 12 Abstract of Bids with no error 4-5 working days after Opening of Canvass.
Success Indicators
W
Q (1) E (2) T (3) A (4)
O
Total 1.80
CORE FUNCTIONS:
R

2. Minutes of Meeting


Prepared 6 Minutes with 2 revisions 5 working Prepared 6 Minutes with 1 revision 3-4 3

4

4

3.67

K

QUALITY Total 1.65
EXPECTED
SUPPORT OUTPUT
FUNCTIONS:
RATING

RATING
TIME STANDARD
STANDARD
S
(per output) (per output) (per output)
1. Accomplished DTR Submitted 6 DTR with (per no revision 6 working
output) Submitted 6 DTR with no revision 4-5 working 5 5 4 4.67
Minutes of Meeting days
5 after the
Noend of the month.
Revision 5 days after the end
Prepared 1-2of working
the month.days after the meeting

4 1 Revision 4 Prepared 3-4 working days after the meeting
H 3
working 2 Revisions
days after instruction. 3 workingPrepared 5 working
days after days after the meeting
instruction.
2 3 Revisions 2 Prepared 6-7 working days after the meeting
3. Communications (Reply) Prepared
1 10 Communications
More than 3 Revisions with 2 revisions
1 Prepared 13 Communications with 1 revision 5
Prepared more than 7 working days after the meeting 4 4 4.33
O
Total 0.44

P
Minutes of Meeting
Prepared 6 Minutes with 1 revision 3-4 working days after the meeting.
Success Indicators
W
Q (1) E (2) T (3) A (4)
O
Total 1.80
CORE FUNCTIONS:
R

K

Total 1.65
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS:
S

H

Total 0.44
O OVERALL RATING
Support Functions: 4.67 + 4.33 + 4.33 = 13.89
Accomplished DTR: 5 + 5 + 4 = 14/3 = 4.67
P Core Functions – 45%
Acknowledgment Letter: 5 + 4 + 4 = 13/3 = 4.33
Communication (Reply): 5 + 4 + 4 = 13/3 = 4.33
13.33/3 = 4.44 x 10%
= 0.44
Success Indicators
W
Q (1) E (2) T (3) A (4)
QUALITY
EXPECTED OUTPUT RATING
STANDARD
1. Plans, Prog. and Proj. Proposal(perSubmitted
output) 1 Proposal with 2 revisions 5 (per output)
Submitted 3 Proposals with 1 (per
revision 3-4output) 5 4 3 4
O
(per output)
Accomplished Daily 5 No Revision 5 Submitted 2-3 working days after the end
Total of the month
1.80
CORE
TimeFUNCTIONS:
Record (DTR) 4 With Revision 4 Submitted 4-5 working days after the end of the month

R
3 3 Submitted 6 working days after the end of the month

2 2 Submitted 7 working days after end of the month
2. Minutes of Meeting 1
Prepared 6 Minutes with 2 revisions 5 working 1 PreparedSubmitted more
6 Minutes withthan 7 working
1 revision 3-4 days after 3 the4 end 4 of the3.67
month
K

Total 1.65
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS:
S

H




4

4

4.33

O
Total 0.44

P
Accomplished Daily Time Record (DTR)
Submitted 6 DTR with no revision 4-5 working days after the end of the month.
Success Indicators
W
Q (1) E (2) T (3) A (4)
QUALITY
(per output) STANDARD (per output) (per output)
O
(per output)
Endorsement Letter 5 No Error 5 Within 1 working day after instruction
Total 1.80
CORE FUNCTIONS:
Transmittal Letter 4 1 Error 4 Within 2 working days after instruction
1.Acknowledgment
Abstract of Bids Prepared 10 Abstract of Bids with no error 4-5 Prepared 12 Abstract of Bids with no error 4 4 3 3.67
R
Letter 3 2 Errors 3 Within 3 working days after instruction
Request Letter 2 3-5 Errors 2 Within 4 working days after instruction

Prepared 6 6Minutes
or more Errors
with 2 revisions 5 working1 PreparedWithin 5 or more
6 Minutes with 1working
revision days
3-4 after instruction
3 4 4 3.67
K

Total 1.65
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS:
S

H




4

4

4.33

O
Total 0.44

P
Acknowledgment Letter
Prepared 98 Letters with 1 error within 2 working days after instruction.
Success Indicators
W
Q (1) E (2) T (3) A (4)
QUALITY
(per output) STANDARD (per output) (per output)
O
(per output)
Communications 5 No Revision 5 Prepared 1-5 working days afterTotal instruction
1.80
CORE FUNCTIONS:
(Reply) 4 1 Revision 4 Prepared 6-10 working days after instruction
R
3 2 Revisions 3 Prepared 1-14 working days after instruction

2 3 Revisions 2 Prepared 15 or more working days after instruction
Prepared 6 More than
Minutes with3 2Revisions 1 Prepared 6 Minutes with 1 revision 3-4
revisions 5 working 3 4 4 3.67
K

Total 1.65
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS:
S

H




4

4

4.33

O
Total 0.44

P
Communication (Reply)
Prepared 13 Communications with 1 revision 6-10 working days after instruction.
Success Indicators
W
Q (1) E (2) T (3) A (4)
O
Total 1.80
CORE FUNCTIONS:
R

K

Total 1.65
SUPPORT FUNCTIONS:
S

H

Total 0.44
O OVERALL RATING Final Average Rating Range

4.51-5.00
Adjectival Rating
Outstanding (O)
Strategic Priorities – 45% 1.80 + 1.65 + 0.44
P
3.51-4.50 Very Satisfactory (VS)
Core Functions – 45%
=3.89 2.51-3.50
1.51-2.50
Satisfactory (S)
Unsatisfactory (US)
1.00-1.50 Poor (P)
EN
THANK
YOU!

For Employees

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

For Employees

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

REORIENTA

3 Item 1 (d) A performance-based incentive

3 Item 4 Step Increments – an employee may progress

3 Item 17(c) The CSC, in developing the Performance

3 Through Resolution No. 1200481 promulgated on

3 A Supervisor shall be the one who plans, programs,

6 Sanctions/Penalties also includes Disqualification for Performance-

5 To address the gaps and weaknesses found in previous evaluation

A systematic process by which an agency

The accomplishment of work performed

An instrument that measures work

To concretize the linkage of overall

To ensure organizational effectiveness

To link performance management

To improve organizational and individual

To align individual and organizational

3 CHAIRPER ROBINSON B. PANUDA

ICO-Assistant Municipal Treasurer • Acts as appeals body and final arbiter.

Source: Strategic Performance Management System (SPMS) Manual

Source: Guidebook on the Strategic Performance Management System

• Output Rating Sheet

MUNICIPALITY OF SANTA CRUZ DESCRIP

6 RATING For Rating. Together with the ORS, submit

1 INPU Four (4) employees requested

T June 15, 2014. ORS up the Output Rating

4 RATI Rina Fe will submit the document to

NG with the ORS attached. ALLAN EGAL

1 INPU Personnel hired on Job Order

T supporting documents for ORS up the Output Rating

5 after submission of documents.

4 RATI Clovy will submit the document to

submitted and rate it accordingly based on the

2 RATI She will return the corrected

NG supervisor for review and assessment. SALMAN SALIK

1 INPU A client request for Issuance of

T Documents at 9:00 am. ORS up the Output Rating

5 Generate copy from the computer

6 Check the veracity of the data

4 RATI She will submit the document to the

3 The MCR, before signing, will review 9:00 am

4 Performance Standards Guide.

Practically, it would be difficult to monitor

(Qty.- EFFECTIV (Qty.- TIMELINE

6 Total Service Records

(Qty.- EFFECTIV (Qty.- TIMELINE

THURSDAY 6 (4-5) 20 (3-5) 15

QUANTITY EFFECTIVENESS TIMELINESS

2 MUNICIPALITY OF SANTA CRUZ

DESCRIPT SUMMARY OF ACCOMPLISHMENT

of all monthly Period

ratings Ratee's Name: ________________________________

COMPUTATION Service Record Ratin Percentage of Actual

COMPUTATION Service Record Average Rating Equivalent Numerical Rating

COMPUTATION Service Record Average Rating Equivalent Numerical Rating

Discussed with Date Assessed by Date Final Rating by

LEGEND: 1 - Quantity 2 - Effectiveness 3 - Timeliness 4 - Average

1 EXPECTED OUTPUT QUANTITY

4 Leave Application Prepared 300 Leave Applications with 3 errors

6 Get your Reviewed IPCR as agreed by you and your supervisor

1 EXPECTED OUTPUT QUANTITY

4 Leave Application Prepared 300 Leave Applications with 3 errors

1 EXPECTED EXPECTED RATING

4 Leave Application Prepared 300 Leave Applications with 3 errors

1 EXPECTED OUTPUT QUANTITY